RESUMEN
Background Atmospheric changes in pollen concentration may affect human health by triggering various allergic processes. We sought to assess if changes in pollen concentrations were associated with different acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtype presentations and short-term clinical outcomes. Methods and Results We analyzed data in consecutive patients presenting with ACS (unstable angina, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2014 and December 2017 and enrolled in the VCOR (Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry). Baseline characteristics were compared among patients exposed to different grass and total pollen concentrations. The primary outcome was occurrence of ACS subtypes and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, or stroke). Of 15 379 patients, 7122 (46.3%) presented with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, 6781 (44.1%) with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, and 1476 (9.6%) with unstable angina. The mean age was 62.5 years, with men comprising 76% of patients. No association was observed between daily or seasonal grass and total pollen concentrations with the frequency of ACS subtype presentation. However, grass and total pollen concentrations in the preceding days (2-day average for grass pollen and 7-day average for total pollen) correlated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.17 [95% CI, 1.12-4.21]; P=0.021 and OR, 2.78 [95% CI, 1.00-7.74]; P=0.05), respectively, with a trend of 2-day grass pollen for 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.97-2.32]; P=0.066). Conclusions Increased pollen concentrations were not associated with differential ACS subtype presentation but were significantly related to in-hospital mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention, underscoring a potential biologic link between pollen exposure and clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Angina Inestable/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Polen , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
There have been numerous and intriguing advancements in antithrombotic therapy for myocardial infarction since it was described in the earliest issues of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. In this article, we revisit historical breakthroughs and describe the four most challenging contemporary themes relating to antithrombotic therapy in myocardial infarction. In all four, the challenge is to find the best balance of reducing specific levels of ischaemic risks without increasing bleeding risk. The first is the question of the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This includes discussion of monotherapy after a period of DAPT. The second relates to the role of genotype and phenotype-guided individualisation of antiplatelet therapy. There is emerging evidence for a role of pheno/genotyping in identifying individuals at high risk for recurrent ischaemic events or in guiding the timing of cardiac surgery for patients on DAPT. The third addresses the increasing evidence for dual pathway inhibition, for example, with rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin in patients where high ischaemic and low bleeding risk is demonstrated. Finally the fourth highlights the challenge of the most appropriate combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for patients with known atrial fibrillation after PCI. In most individuals, oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy combined with a direct acting oral anticoagulant appears to be the best strategy based on the available evidence. Overall, the progress in antithrombotic therapy achieved over the last seven decades is remarkable, however, there are important issues to address and progress still to be made.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Animales , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/etiologíaRESUMEN
We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a standardized clinical pathway to facilitate safe discharge home at the earliest time after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Between May 2012 and October 2014, the Heart Team developed a clinical pathway suited to the unique requirements of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in contemporary practice. The components included risk-stratified minimalist periprocedure approach, standardized postprocedure care with early mobilization and reconditioning, and criteria-driven discharge home. Our aim was to reduce variation in care, identify a subgroup of patients suitable for early discharge (≤48 hours), and decrease length of stay for all patients. We addressed barriers related to historical practices, complex multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement, and adoption of length of stay as a quality indicator. We retrospectively reviewed the experiences of 393 consecutive patients; 150 (38.2%) were discharged early. At baseline, early discharge patients had experienced less previous balloon aortic valvuloplasty, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction, better cognitive function, and were less frail than the standard discharge group (>48 hours). Early discharge was associated with the use of local anesthesia, implantation of balloon expandable device, avoidance of urinary catheter, and early removal of temporary pacemaker. Median length of stay was 1 day for early discharge and 3 days for other patients; 97.7% were discharged home. There were no differences in 30-day mortality (1.3%), disabling stroke (0.8%), or readmission (10.7%). The implementation of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement clinical pathway shifted the program's approach to combine standardized processes and individual risk stratification. The Vancouver transcatheter aortic valve replacement clinical pathway requires a rigorous assessment to determine its efficacy, safety, and reproducibility.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Colombia Británica , Difusión de Innovaciones , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the development of a multicenter, transcatheter aortic valve replacement program and regional systems of care intended to optimize coordinated, efficient, and appropriate delivery of this new therapy. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an accepted treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high surgical risk. Regional systems of care have led to improvements in outcomes for patients undergoing intervention for myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and stroke. We implemented a regional system of care for patients undergoing TAVR in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We describe a prospective observational cohort of 583 patients who underwent TAVR in British Columbia between 2012 and 2014. Regionalization of TAVR care in British Columbia refers to a centrally coordinated, funded, and evaluated program led by a medical director and a multidisciplinary advisory group that oversees planning, access to care, and quality of outcomes at the 4 provincial sites. Risk-stratified case selection for transfemoral TAVR is performed by heart teams at each site on the basis of consensus provincial indications. Referrals for lower volume and more complicated TAVR, including nontransfemoral access and valve-in-valve procedures, are concentrated at a single site. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes are reported. RESULTS: The median age was 83 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 78 to 87 years) and median STS score was 6% (IQR: 4% to 8%). Transfemoral access was performed in 499 (85.6%) cases and nontransfemoral in 84 (14.4%). Transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures in for failed bioprosthetic valves were performed in 43 patients (7.4%). A balloon-expandable valve was inserted in 386 (66.2%) and a self-expanding valve in 189 (32.4%). All-cause 30-day mortality was 3.5%. All-cause in-hospital mortality and disabling stroke occurred in 3.1% and 1.9%, respectively. Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR: 3 to 6 days), with 92.8% of patients discharged directly home. CONCLUSIONS: This experience demonstrates the potential benefits of a regional system of care for TAVR. Excellent outcomes were demonstrated: most patients had short in-hospital stays and were discharged directly home.