RESUMEN
Objective: Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported the effect of probiotics on reducing plasma lipids with inconsistent results. An explicit systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in this study to evaluate the effect of probiotics on the lipid profile of healthy and hyperlipidemia participants. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of RCTs was conducted using PubMed, Embase, World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus, WHO clinical trial registry, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Inclusion criteria included RCTs comparing the use of any strain of a specified probiotic with the placebo control group. The change in lipid profiles was analyzed. Results: The probiotics can decrease the total cholesterol (TC) level in hyperlipidemia participants but not healthy persons (MD = -0.43, 95% CI -0.60 - -0.25, P < .01; MD = -0.09, 95% CI -0.26 - 0.08, P > .05). Probiotics did not reduce high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with hyperlipidemia or healthy people (MD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.09 - 0.07, P > .05; MD = 0.02, 95% CI -0.04 - 0.09, P > .05). Furthermore, probiotics can reduce the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level both in hyperlipidemia and healthy persons (MD = -0.34, 95% CI -0.43 - -0.26, P < .01; MD = -0.15, 95% CI -0.28 - -0.02, P < .05). Lastly, the effect of probiotics on reducing triglyceride (TG) levels was significant in hyperlipidemia persons but not in the healthy population (MD = -0.20, 95% CI -0.37 - -0.04, P < .01; MD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 - 0.04, P > .05). Conclusions: Through our analysis, the effect of probiotics on lowering plasma lipid was more obvious in hyperlipidemia participants than healthy population. However, further studies are required to confirm the findings due to pronounced clinical heterogeneity.
Asunto(s)
Hiperlipidemias , Probióticos , Humanos , Voluntarios Sanos , LDL-Colesterol , Hiperlipidemias/prevención & control , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Estado de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate how electroacupuncture (EA) at Zusanli (ST 36) with varying intensities of stimulation affects dorsal root nerve signals in normal rats. METHODS: Adult female Wistar rats were examined after drug-induced anesthesia and isolation of the L4 dorsal root associated with the Zusanli (ST 36) acupoint, using bipolar platinum electrodes. We applied EA at Zusanli (ST 36) with a continuous wave waveform for 1 min, and recorded action potentials in the L4 spinal cord dorsal root nerve with a frequency of 5 Hz and various current intensity levels (approximately 1-4 mA). In addition, we tested EA with a frequency of 15 Hz and current intensity of 1-4 mA. The L4 spinal cord dorsal nerve bundle action potentials were measured for 1 min of EA. To analyze the discharge frequency, we used the maximum Lyapunov exponent and Lempel-Ziv (LZ) complexity. RESULTS: At a fixed frequency, with increasing intensity of EA, dorsal root nerve filament discharge frequency revealed an initial increase, followed by a decreasing trend. A stimulation intensity of 3 mA induced a significantly greater discharge frequency, compared with stimulation intensities of 2 and 4 mA. EA stimulation evoked neuroelectric signals with chaotic characteristics. Increased intensity led to an initial increase in LZ complexity which then decreased, with a stimulation strength of 3 mA inducing the highest level of LZ complexity. CONCLUSION: EA of different intensities can induce nerve action potential encoding with different features.