Education, Knowledge, and Practice Characteristics of Cannabis Physicians: A Survey of the Society of Cannabis Clinicians.

Context: Medical cannabis use has increased in recent years despite being a federally illegal drug in the United States. States with medical cannabis use laws require patients to be certified by physicians. However, little is known about the education, knowledge, and practice characteristics of physicians who recommend and supervise patients' use of medical cannabis. Objective: This study assessed how U.S. physicians who practice cannabis medicine are educated, self-assess their knowledge, and describe their practice. Methods: In fall 2017, a 57-item, electronic survey was sent to all members of the Society of Cannabis Clinicians. Because California has had legalized medical cannabis for longer than any other state, we analyzed responses for 14 items between California and non-California physicians. Results: Of 282 surveyed, 133 were eligible and 45 completed the survey. Of those, multiple medical specialties were represented. Only one physician received education during medical school about cannabis medicine, but physicians gained knowledge through conferences (71%, 32/45), the medical literature (64%, 29/45), and websites (62%, 28/45). Just over half (56%, 20/45) felt that there was sufficient information available to practice cannabis medicine. Of the 37 who answered the knowledge question, most felt knowledgable about cannabinoids (78%, 29/37) and the endocannabinoid system (76%, 28/37). There was a wide variation in the number of cannabis recommendations provided by physicians over the course of their practice career (median 1200; interquartile range, 100-5000), and most provided condition-specific treatment (69%, 31/45) and dosing recommendations (62%, 28/45). The majority (81%, 30/37) of physicians received referrals from mainstream medical providers. No differences were found between California and non-California physicians, except more women were from California (p=0.02). Conclusions: The use of medical cannabis continues to increase in the United States and globally. All states that allow medical cannabis require a physician's recommendation, yet few states require specific clinical training. Findings of this study suggest the need for more formal education and training of physicians in medical school and residency, more opportunities for cannabis-related continuing medical education for practicing physicians, and clinical and basic science research that will inform best practices in cannabis medicine.

A Survey on the Effect That Medical Cannabis Has on Prescription Opioid Medication Usage for the Treatment of Chronic Pain at Three Medical Cannabis Practice Sites.

OBJECTIVE: The opioid epidemic continues to claim thousands of lives every year without an effective strategy useful in mitigating mortality. The use of medical cannabis has been proposed as a potential strategy to decrease opioid usage. The objective of this study was to determine how the use of medical cannabis affects prescribed opioid usage in chronic pain patients. METHODS: We conducted an online convenience sample survey of patients from three medical cannabis practice sites who had reported using opioids. A total of 1181 patients responded, 656 were excluded for not using medical cannabis in combination with opioid use or not meeting the definition of chronic pain, leaving 525 patients who had used prescription opioid medications continuously for at least three months to treat chronic pain and were using medical cannabis in combination with their prescribed opioid use. RESULTS: Overall, 40.4% (n=204) reported that they stopped all opioids, 45.2% (n=228) reported some decrease in their opioid usage, 13.3% (n=67) reported no change in opioid usage, and 1.1% (n=6) reported an increase in opioid usage. The majority (65.3%, n=299) reported that they sustained the opioid change for over a year. Almost half (48.2%, n=241) reported a 40-100% decrease in pain while 8.6% (n=43) had no change in pain and 2.6% (n=13) had worsening pain. The majority reported improved ability to function (80.0%, n=420) and improved quality of life (87.0%, n=457) with medical cannabis. The majority (62.8%, n=323) did not want to take opioids in the future. While the change in pain level was not affected by age and gender, the younger age group had improved ability to function compared with the middle and older age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in this study reported that cannabis was a useful adjunct and substitute for prescription opioids in treating their chronic pain and had the added benefit of improving the ability to function and quality of life.

The current status of artisanal cannabis for the treatment of epilepsy in the United States.

The widespread patient use of artisanal cannabis preparations has preceded quality validation of cannabis use for epilepsy. Neurologists and cannabinoid specialists are increasingly in a position to monitor and guide the use of herbal cannabis in epilepsy patients. We report the retrospective data on efficacy and adverse effects of artisanal cannabis in Patients with medically refractory epilepsy with mixed etiologies in Washington State, California, and Maine. Clinical considerations, including potential risks and benefits, challenges related to artisanal preparations, and cannabinoid dosing, are discussed. RESULTS: Of 272 combined patients from Washington State and California, 37 (14%) found cannabis ineffective at reducing seizures, 29 (15%) experienced a 1-25% reduction in seizures, 60 (18%) experienced a 26-50% reduction in seizures, 45 (17%) experienced a 51-75% reduction in seizures, 75 (28%) experienced a 76-99% reduction in seizures, and 26 (10%) experienced a complete clinical response. Overall, adverse effects were mild and infrequent, and beneficial side effects such as increased alertness were reported. The majority of patients used cannabidiol (CBD)-enriched artisanal formulas, some with the addition of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA). Four case reports are included that illustrate clinical responses at doses <0.1mg/kg/day, biphasic dose-response effects, the use of THCA for seizure prevention, the use of THC for seizure rescue, and the synergy of cannabinoids and terpenoids in artisanal preparations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Cannabinoids and Epilepsy".