Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 67(4): 228-32, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20164502

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cooking with gas or electric stoves produces fumes, especially during frying, that contain a range of harmful and potentially mutagenic compounds as well as high levels of fine and ultrafine particles. The aim of this study was to see if polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and higher mutagenic aldehydes which were collected in the breathing zone of the cook, could be detected in fumes from the frying of beefsteak. METHODS: The frying was performed in a model kitchen in conditions similar to those in a Western European restaurant kitchen. The levels of PAHs (16 EPA standard) and higher aldehydes (trans,trans-2,4-decadienal, 2,4-decadienal, trans-trans-2,4-nonadienal, trans-2-decenal, cis-2-decenal, trans-2-undecenal, 2-undecenal) were measured during frying on an electric or gas stove with margarine or soya bean oil as the frying fat. The number concentration of particles <100 nm in size (ultrafine) was also measured, as well as the mass concentration of total particulate matter. RESULTS: Levels of naphthalene were in the range of 0.15-0.27 microg/m(3) air. Measured levels of mutagenic aldehydes were between non-detectable and 61.80 microg/m(3) air. The exposure level of total aerosol was between 1.6 and 7.2 mg/m(3) air. Peak number concentrations of ultrafine particles were in the range of 6.0x10(4)-89.6x10(4) particles/cm(3) air. CONCLUSION: Naphthalene and mutagenic aldehydes were detected in most of the samples. The levels were variable, and seemed to be dependent on many factors involved in the frying process. However, according to the present results, frying on a gas stove instead of an electric stove causes increased occupational exposure to some of the components in cooking fumes which may cause adverse health effects.


Asunto(s)
Aldehídos/toxicidad , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Carne , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidad , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Aldehídos/análisis , Culinaria , Grasas Insaturadas en la Dieta , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Calor , Humanos , Mutágenos/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Material Particulado/toxicidad , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análisis , Aceite de Soja/química
2.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 52(8): 739-45, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18977847

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to see if a cook could be exposed to mutagenic aldehydes in fumes from frying of beefsteak using margarine, rapeseed oil, soybean oil or virgin olive oil as frying fat. In addition, levels of particle exposure were measured to make the results comparable to other studies. METHODS: The levels of higher aldehydes and total particles were measured in the breathing zone of the cook during the panfrying of beefsteak with the four different frying fats. In addition, the number of particles in the size intervals 0.3-0.5, 0.5-0.7 and 0.7-1.0 microm in the kitchen was registered. RESULTS: Measured levels of mutagenic aldehydes were between non-detectable and 25.33 microg m(-3) air. The exposure level of total aerosol was between 1.0 and 11.6 mg m(-3). CONCLUSIONS: Higher aldehydes were detected in all samples from this study, and mutagenic aldehydes were detected in most of the samples. Frying with margarine gave statistically significantly higher levels of mutagenic aldehydes and particles in all three size fractions than frying with the three different kinds of oil.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Aldehídos/análisis , Culinaria , Grasas Insaturadas en la Dieta , Carne , Mutágenos/análisis , Aerosoles , Animales , Bovinos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Ácidos Grasos Monoinsaturados , Calor , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación , Modelos Lineales , Margarina , Aceite de Oliva , Tamaño de la Partícula , Material Particulado , Aceites de Plantas , Aceite de Brassica napus , Aceite de Soja , Volatilización
3.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ; 18(2): 175-82, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17457323

RESUMEN

This study presents and evaluates an expert group's assessment of exposure to carcinogens for defined job categories in Norway's offshore petroleum industry, 1970-2005, to provide exposure information for a planned cohort study on cancer. Three university and five industry experts in occupational hygiene individually assessed the likelihood of exposure to 1836 combinations of carcinogens (n=17), job categories (n=27) and time periods (n=4). In subsequent plenary discussions, the experts agreed on exposed combinations. Agreement between the individual and the panel assessments was calculated by Cohen's kappa index. Using the panel assessment as reference, sensitivity and specificity were estimated. The eight experts assessed 63% of the 1836 combinations in plenary, resulting in 265 (14%) convened exposed combinations. Chlorinated hydrocarbons, benzene and inhalation of mineral oils had the highest number of exposed job categories (n=14, 9 and 10, respectively). The job categories classified as exposed to the highest numbers of carcinogens were the mechanics (n=10), derrick workers (n=6) and process technicians (n=5). The agreement between the experts' individual assessments and the panel assessment was kappa=0.53-0.74. The sensitivity was 0.55-0.86 and specificity 0.91-0.97. For these parameters, there were no apparent differences between the university experts and the industry experts. The resulting 265 of 1836 possible exposure combinations convened as "exposed" by expert assessment is presented in this study. The experts' individual ratings highly agreed with the succeeding panel assessment. Correlation was found between years of experience of the raters and agreement with the panel. The university experts and the industry experts' assessments had no apparent differences. Further validation of the exposure assessment is suggested, such as by new sampling data or observational studies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos Ambientales/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/clasificación , Ocupaciones/clasificación , Petróleo , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Carcinógenos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Consenso , Docentes , Humanos , Industrias , Noruega , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral , Petróleo/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/normas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Universidades
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA