People with spina bifida use their MACE on long-term follow-up: A single institutional retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: While the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) facilitates bowel movements in patients with spina bifida (SB) and neuropathic bowel, little is known about its long-term use. We aimed to assess long-term MACE use and potential risk factors for disuse. METHODS: All patients with SB who underwent MACE procedures at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Main outcome was MACE disuse (no longer catheterizing the MACE for antegrade enemas) based on self-report on a clinic questionnaire, or medical record for patients last seen before introducing the questionnaire 5 years ago. Survival analysis used two timeframes: time after surgery (Analysis 1) and chronological age: accounting for older children reaching adulthood earlier (Analysis 2). RESULTS: Overall, 411 patients (54% female, 78% shunted, 65% augmented) underwent a MACE procedure at median 7.9 years old (median follow-up: 8.4 years). Thirty-three (8%) patients no longer used their MACE. Most common reasons for doing so were channel/stomal stenosis (61%) and excision at colostomy or other abdominal surgery (12%). Bowel management afterwards included oral agents ± enemas (55%), Chait tube (30%), colostomy (12%). After correcting for differential follow-up, 90% of participants used their MACE at 10 years and 87% at 15 years after surgery. Based on chronological age, 97% used their MACE at 15 years old, 92% at 20 and 81% at 30 (Summary Figure). On multivariate analysis, umbilical MACEs were 2.4 times more likely to be disused than right lower quadrant MACEs (p = 0.04). Without correcting for chronological age (Analysis 1), patients undergoing MACE surgery at older ages were more likely to stop MACE use (p = 0.03). However, after accounting for chronological age (Analysis 2), patients undergoing a MACE procedure at older ages were no more likely to stop its use (p = 0.47, Figure). Gender, SB type, shunt status, mobility status, bladder augmentation or a urinary catheterizable channel were not associated with stopping MACE use (p ≥ 0.10). COMMENT: Participants were regularly followed in multi-disciplinary SB clinics. We did not assess continence, satisfaction or long-term urinary channel use, making it premature to recommend optimal stomal locations. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SB followed by a multi-disciplinary team continue using their MACE; 1% stopped MACE use annually, particularly after adolescence. This strongly suggests it is an effective bowel management method and transitioning to self-care plays a role in maintaining long-term MACE use. Umbilical MACEs may be at high risk of disuse, but all people with a MACE can benefit from support as they transition to adult care.

A patient- and parent-centered approach to urinary and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents with spina bifida: understanding experiences in the context of other competing care issues.

INTRODUCTION: Despite significant and known challenges to urinary and fecal incontinence (UI and FI, respectively) among children with spina bifida (SB) and their families, few studies have identified patient-centered measures and approaches to assessing them. This study represents the first stage of a larger study to develop a patient-centered goal-setting tool to guide incontinence management (Figure). Our aim was to understand patient experiences of UI and FI, and what goals should be included in the tool. METHODS: We used a qualitative research approach integrated with human-centered design methods. We recruited, in clinic and online, children with SB (8-17 years old) and parents (>=18 years old) of children with SB (8-17 years old). Online activities were analyzed by four experienced design researchers using affinity diagramming, group analysis and modeling activities (mind maps, challenge maps, experience maps). Recruitment and thematic qualitative analysis continued until saturation was reached. RESULTS: Seventeen children with SB participated (9 female, 12 shunted, 13 using bladder catheterizations, 6 using Malone antegrade continence enema, median age: 15 years old). Fifteen parents participated (13 mothers/2 fathers, median age: 42 years old), including six mother-child dyads. Five major themes each were identified for UI and FI experiences: (1) negative emotional impact of incontinence, (2) unpredictability of incontinence, (3) challenging/unpleasant incontinence management, (4) inconvenient/unreliable incontinence management, (5) UI management having unpleasant complications and FI putting much responsibility on parents. We identified six UI goal domains and five FI goal domains. Four overlapping domains included: accidents, independence, interruptions at school and social/friends. Unique domains were: urinary tract infections (UI), catheterizations (UI) and enemas (FI). COMMENT: Findings of our study improve our understanding of children's and parents' experiences associated with incontinence in SB and potential continence goals. CONCLUSIONS: Children with SB experience incontinence as distressing and unpredictable. Incontinence management can be challenging and unreliable. Patient-centered continence goals cluster in domains, indicating how incontinence intermeshes with other life areas and offering potential approaches to structure continence goals in a goals-selection tool.

Sacral nerve stimulator success after filum section for refractory dysfunctional voiding.

INTRODUCTION: Filum section (FS) has been used to treat tethered cord syndrome (on MRI or occult) in pediatric patients with refractory dysfunctional voiding (DV). While controversial, some groups have previously reported significant improvement in patients' symptoms after FS, even in the presence of a normal preoperative spinal MRI. Until recently, it was our practice to refer patients with DV to pediatric neurosurgery for evaluation, MRI, and possible FS. OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with sacral nerve stimulator (SNS) placement for pediatric patients with refractory DV after failed FS with the primary outcome being complications and explantations. The secondary outcome being change in quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients <18 years old who underwent second stage SNS placement after FS at our institution between November 2012 and December 2019. We abstracted rate of 2nd stage implantation, complication, and explantation. We also collected age-appropriate preoperative and postoperative 15-question quality of life questionnaires (PedsQL™). The PedsQL scores ranged 0-100, higher numbers correlating with higher quality of life. A paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 23 children proceeded to the second stage SNS due to persistent symptoms following FS. Median age at SNS implantation was 10.3 years (IQR 7.5-11.8 years), and 13 were female (56.5%). There were no intraoperative complications. Median follow-up was 2.8 years (IQR 1.1-3.7 years). One patient had the SNS removed due to a need for MRI, one for resolution of symptoms, and 4 patients underwent lead revision for lead fracture and return of symptoms (17.4%). All 15 patients who completed both preoperative and postoperative PedsQL reported significantly improved overall scores after SNS (Figure). Median scores improved from 61.7 to 86.7 (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Symptom relief in the child with refractory DV using SNS is not new. However, we sought to review our results in those with previous FS for tethered cord syndrome. While our study is limited by its small size, we assessed both surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Our patients' marked improvement in quality of life is similar to that of other reported pediatric SNS cohorts. CONCLUSION: SNS placement after FS is feasible, safe, and can result in significant improvement in overall quality of life. Given these findings, we have changed our practice to offer SNS in patients with refractory DV with a normal lumbosacral spinal MRI. For those with MRI abnormalities, we seek neurosurgical evaluation for FS (if deemed necessary) prior to considering SNS.

Integrative review and evaluation of quality of life related instruments in pediatric urology.

INTRODUCTION: While most paediatric urologists consider patients' quality of life (QOL) important, few actually measure this outcome. Our goal was to assess instruments used in the pediatric urology QOL literature, specifically looking at whether they captured QOL. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles with a self-described primary outcome of measuring QOL. All validated QOL instruments in the papers were analyzed by QOL instrument content experts. Instruments were classified as focusing on: Functioning or QOL (Table). The term Functioning focuses on performing activities. QOL captures person's perceptions about their position in life, informed by circumstances, functioning and conditions. QOL instruments were further subdivided into generic QOL, health-related QOL (HRQOL) and disease-specific HRQOL. Only direct patient self-reported QOL instruments were then assessed, since they are the most clinically useful, reliably assessing patients' own perception of their QOL. RESULTS: Forty-three publications met inclusion criteria (published 1999-2019). Most common conditions included urinary incontinence (16, 37.2%) and kidney transplantation (12, 27.9%). Overall, 22 unique instruments purporting to measure QOL were identified. Looking at the concepts measured by each instrument, nine instruments (40.9%) assessed Functioning. Nine instruments (40.9%) measured a combination of Functioning and QOL. Only the remaining 4 instruments (18.2%) assessed strictly QOL. The 13 instruments assessing any QOL focused on generic QOL (n = 4), HRQOL (n = 3) and disease-specific HRQOL (n = 6). Of the subset of four instruments assessing strictly QOL, and not Functioning, all had patient self-reported versions available: two generic QOL instruments (KINDL, KIDSCREEN), one generic HRQOL (DISABKIDS), and one disease-specific HRQOL (QUALAS). Thirteen of 43 studies (30.2%) employed more than one instrument. Thirty-eight studies (88.4%) used an instrument measuring Functioning, with 19 (44.1%) measuring only Functioning, not QOL at all. Twenty-four studies (55.8%) used an instrument measuring actual QOL, although 17 (39.5%) used a combined Functioning/QOL instrument. Only nine (20.9%) used a strictly QOL instrument (strictly HRQOL instruments: 4.7%). DISCUSSION: We present encouraging evidence of sustained interest in QOL research in pediatric urology and identify areas needing improvement. Selecting appropriate QOL tools requires a working knowledge of their various underlying meanings and purposes. Whether it adequately assess QOL must be considered. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of instruments and a practical approach to QOL instrument selection. CONCLUSION: Much of pediatric urology is grounded in improving QOL. Unfortunately, most studies published to date focus on Functioning, rather than young people's perception-based QOL. Future QOL studies should ideally employ validated instruments capturing patient-reported QOL.

Troubleshooting problems with antegrade continent enema flushes: The Indiana university algorithm.

INTRODUCTION: Antegrade continence enemas have transformed treatment and improved the quality of life in children with neuropathic bowel, refractory constipation and fecal incontinence. However, it can often be difficult to manage problems that arise with ACE flushes. OBJECTIVE: We report the use of an online tool designed for nurses to help troubleshoot calls for problems associated with antegrade continence enema (ACE) flushes as well as update our algorithm for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence in a large single institution experience. STUDY DESIGN: We developed an online tool based on our management protocol for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence (Summary Figure). Patient frequency and bother was assessed prior to the intervention and at one month after the intervention using 5- and 4-point Likert scales respectively. Patient demographics, MACE/Chait information, type of difficulty, volume of flush, and use of additives were recorded. Nurses were also interviewed prior to using the tool and 14 months after its development with regards to taking these phone calls and the helpfulness of the tool. RESULTS: Over 14 months, the nurses received 22 patients calls via the nursing triage line regarding ACE flush problems and prospectively collected data. Half reported multiple episodes of fecal incontinence. Other complaints included no response to flush (8, 36.4%), occasional episodes of liquid fecal incontinence (2, 9.1%) and time of flush exceeding 60 min (1, 4.5%). While patients did not report decreased frequency of problems as a result of nurse troubleshooting using the ACE algorithm (2.5 vs. 2, p = 0.55), patients did report a significant improvement in their bother scores (4 vs. 2, p = 0.02). All but one patient reported that the recommendation was "some" or "a lot" helpful on follow up interview. The nurses all indicated that the tool helped "some" or "a lot." DISCUSSION: The antegrade continence enema is valuable in managing neurogenic bowel, refractory constipation, and fecal incontinence, however, some patients experience problems with flushes that can often be difficult to manage. CONCLUSION: Patients reported less bother with their bowel issues after using our algorithm for managing refractory constipation/fecal incontinence and nurses reported that the tool was helpful.

Adherence with bladder irrigation following augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bladder augmentation (BA) are routinely counseled to irrigate their bladders daily. However, reports of adherence with this regimen are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to a bladder irrigation protocol and identify risk factors associated with adherence among adults with spina bifida (SB) and BA. STUDY DESIGN: Adults with SB after BA followed in a multidisciplinary clinic were identified (2017-2019). All patients or caregivers were taught the importance of and the technique for the bladder irrigation protocol prior to and after BA. Patient demographics (age, gender, ambulatory status, and presence of a caregiver in clinics) and surgical details (type of BA, age at surgery, length of follow-up, presence of a catheterizable channel, position of stoma, bladder neck surgery, presence of Malone antegrade colonic enema or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt, and number of stone surgeries) were obtained from the medical record. Patients reported other variables in a standardized clinic questionnaire. Answers were confirmed by health care providers. The variables included who performs clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), size of catheter, frequency of CIC, use of overnight catheterization, difficulties with CIC, number of UTIs, and continence per urethra and per catheterizable channel. Adherence to bladder irrigation was also assessed in the questionnaire. ?Strict adherence' was defined as bladder irrigation performed ≥6 times/week with ≥120 mL of saline. For statistical analysis, a more lenient definition of ?higher adherence' was used: bladder irrigation ≥2 times/week with at least 60 mL. ?Lower adherence' was defined as ≤1 time/week or with less than 60 mL. Factors associated with ?higher adherence' were assessed with non-parametric tests (Bonferroni-corrected p-value: 0.002). RESULTS: Adherence was assessed in 87 eligible patients (60.9% females; mean age of 28.8 ± 8.2 years). No patient (0.0%) reported ?strict adherence', and 62 and 25 patients (71.3% and 28.7%) reported ?higher' and ?lower' adherence' to bladder irrigation, respectively. Nine patients (10.3%) in the ?lower adherence' group did not irrigate at all. No variables were statistically significant on univariate analysis, including previous bladder stone surgery or having a channel (p ≥ 0.01). On exploratory analysis, higher adherence was only associated with self-catheterizations versus those performed by caregivers (76.7% vs 33.3%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to a bladder irrigation protocol in adults with SB and BA is poor. A history of bladder stones requiring surgery and the presence of a catheterizable channel do not appear to affect adherence. It remains unclear why some patients are more likely than others to irrigate their bladders. Future work will focus on methods to improve adherence.

Comparing inpatient versus outpatient bowel preparation in children and adolescents undergoing appendicovesicostomy.

PURPOSE: The need for mechanical inpatient bowel preparation (IBP) in reconstructive pediatric urology has come under scrutiny, secondary to literature demonstrating little benefit regarding outcomes. Starting in 2013, a majority of patients undergoing reconstructive procedures at our institution no longer underwent IBP. We hypothesized that outpatient bowel preparation (OBP) would reduce length of stay (LOS) without increasing postoperative complications after appendicovesicostomy surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional database of patients undergoing lower urinary tract reconstruction between May 2010 and December 2014 was reviewed. Starting in 2013, a departmental decision was made to replace IBP with OBP. Patients undergoing an augmentation cystoplasty or continent ileovesicostomy were excluded because of insufficient numbers undergoing OBP. Patients undergoing IBP were admitted 1 day prior to surgery and received polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution. A personalized preoperative OBP was introduced in 2013. Cost data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, with 30 (44.8%) undergoing IBP. There were no differences with respect to gender, age, presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt, body mass index, glomerular filtration rate, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, and prior or simultaneous associated surgeries (p ≥ 0.07). Patients undergoing an IBP had a longer median LOS (7 vs. 5 days, p = 0.0002) and a higher median cost (US$4,288, p = 0.01). Postoperative complications in both groups were uncommon and were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2, with no statistical difference (IBP 20.0% vs. OBP 5.4%, p = 0.13). No serious postoperative complication occurred, such as a dehiscence, bowel obstruction, or shunt infection. DISCUSSION: This is the first analysis of hospitalization costs and IBP, showing a higher median cost of US$4288 compared with OBP. The LOS was shorter with an OBP (figure), similar to a previous report. Similar complication rates between the groups add to the growing body of literature that avoidance of IBP is safe in pediatric lower urinary tract reconstruction. Being a retrospective review of a practice change, differences in care that influenced cost and LOS may be missing. Also, as the surgeons do not know if a usable appendix is initially present, our data may not extrapolate to all patients. Despite these potential limitations, our data support the safety of utilizing OBP in patients with a high likelihood of a usable appendix, including those undergoing a synchronous Malone antegrade continence enema via a split-appendix technique. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing an appendicovesicostomy, preoperative IBP led to longer LOS and higher costs of hospitalization. OBP was not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications.

A novel colonoscopic approach for the management of a Malone antegrade continence enema channel, which cannot be catheterized in the immediate postoperative period: a case report.

Early Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) complications are rare, but can be devastating, particularly if they involve loss of the channel. Management of these complications is not well described. We report on a patient who had her MACE channel successfully salvaged in the immediate postoperative period using a colonoscopic retrograde wire and catheter placement after failing antegrade percutaneous endoscopic management. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a novel, colonoscopic, minimally invasive technique of managing select MACE channels, which cannot be otherwise recatheterized. We also review the management of postoperative MACE complications.

Fish consumption and prostate cancer risk: a review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer incidence varies 60-fold globally, which suggests the roles of lifestyle and dietary factors in its cause. To our knowledge, a comprehensive assessment of the association between fish consumption and prostate cancer incidence and mortality has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a meta-analysis of fish intake and prostate cancer by focusing on the incidence of prostate cancer and prostate cancer-specific mortality and included subgroup analyses based on race, fish type, method of fish preparation, and high-grade and high-stage cancer. DESIGN: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (May 2009) for case-control and cohort studies that assessed fish intake and prostate cancer risk. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. RESULTS: There was no association between fish consumption and a significant reduction in prostate cancer incidence [12 case-control studies (n = 5777 cases and 9805 control subjects), odds ratio (OR): 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.00; and 12 cohort studies (n = 445,820), relative risk (RR): 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.14]. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis for high-grade disease (one case-control study, OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.58, 3.03), locally advanced disease (one cohort study, RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.13), or metastatic disease (one cohort study, RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.86). There was an association between fish consumption and a significant 63% reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality [4 cohort studies (n = 49,661), RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.74]. CONCLUSION: Our analyses provide no strong evidence of a protective association of fish consumption with prostate cancer incidence but showed a significant 63% reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality.