Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection and feasibility of surgery between sennoside versus polyethylene glycol as a mechanical bowel preparation of elective colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To validate the usefulness of sennoside as a substitute for polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) for elective colon cancer surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial comparing the use of sennoside and PEG in MBP for elective colon cancer surgery, in terms of the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and the feasibility of surgery. RESULTS: The overall incidence of SSIs was 2.9 % in the sennoside group (n = 68) and 6.3 % in the PEG group (n = 63) with a difference of 3.4 % (95 % confidence interval 6.9-10.6 %). The intraoperative spillage of the stool materials in the sennoside and PEG groups was 4.4 and 3.1 %, respectively, and was not significantly different (p = 0.71), even the upstream stool consistency, was more frequently observed to be non-stool in the PEG group (65.1 vs. 30.9 %, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MBP with sennoside could be a substitution for PEG in elective colon cancer surgery.

[The clinical outcome of mFOLFOX6 treatment for colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection of liver metastasis -comparison between synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis].

Only a few reports have suggested the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy including oxaliplatin based regimens following surgical resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Since an administration of mFOLFOX6 was approved to medical insurance for advanced colorectal cancer as adjuvant chemotherapy, we applied mFOLFOX6 treatment (6 to 12 courses) to the patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal liver metastasis. The subjects were 14 patients who underwent curative resection for synchronous or metachronous colorectal liver metastasis and received mFOLFOX6 treatment postoperatively from January 2006 to January 2011. We retrospectively analyzed the patient's characteristics, relapse free survival, overall survival, and adverse events in these patients. Synchronous liver metastasis was found in 5 patients, while metachronous liver metastasis was observed in 9 patients. There were no significant differences between these patients in terms of clinical characteristics, the relapse free survival and overall survival. All patients had some adverse events including bone-marrow suppression and diarrhea. Especially, grade 3 or higher bone-marrow suppression were recognized in 6 patients (42.8%). Neurologic toxicity (≤ grade 2) was observed in 10 patients (71.4%). Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 treatment following surgical resection of synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis was safely administered. We will further examine the benefit of mFOLFOX6 treatment for the patients who undergo a surgical resection of liver metastasis in the future.

Association of gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression of gastric carcinomas with tumor thymidylate synthase expression and response to postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: It is well known that both gastric and intestinal phenotypic markers are expressed in gastric carcinomas, irrespective of their histological type. In the present study, the associations among phenotypic marker expression of gastric carcinomas, tumor thymidylate synthase (TS) expression, and the chemotherapeutic response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were examined. METHODS: The gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression of the tumor was determined by the combination of the expression of human gastric mucin (HGM), MUC6, MUC2, and CD10, and was evaluated in comparison with tumor TS expression in 137 advanced gastric carcinomas in 137 patients (75 with postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and 62 without postoperative chemotherapy). Tumors were classified into the gastric- (G-), gastric and intestinal mixed- (GI-), intestinal- (I-), or unclassified- (UC-) phenotype according to the immunopositivity of HGM, MUC6, MUC2, and CD10 stainings. The associations among the gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression of the tumor, tumor TS expression, effect of postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU, and the patient's prognosis were examined. RESULTS: Of the 137 gastric carcinomas, 48 (35.0%), 58 (42.3%), 23 (16.8%), and 8 (5.8%)were classified as the G-, GI-, I- and UC-phenotype, respectively. The high TS expression of more than 25% tumor cell positivity was found in 25 (52.1%) of the 48 G-phenotype tumors, 39 (67.2%) of the 58 GI-phenotype tumors, 18 (78.3%) of the 23 I-phenotype tumors, and 4 (50.0%) of the 8 UC-phenotype tumors. The I-phenotype tumors were significantly correlated with the higher rate of the high TS expression as compared with the G-phenotype tumors (P<0.05). Among 48 patients with the G-phenotype tumor, the 5-year survival rate in patients with and without postoperative chemotherapy was 39.7 and 27.8%, respectively. The patients with postoperative chemotherapy had a significantly better prognosis than those without postoperative chemotherapy (P<0.05). Conversely, there were no significant correlations between the presence of postoperative chemotherapy and the patient's prognosis among patients with GI-, I-, and UC-phenotype tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU could be effective for patients with the G-phenotype tumor, since the incidence of intratumoral expression of TS, the target enzyme of 5-FU, is significantly low in G-phenotype tumors.