Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2441-2449, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37466903

RESUMEN

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become one of the standard radical treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on patients with PCa who underwent RARP at Gifu University Hospital between September 2017 and September 2022. In this study, patients were classified into three groups based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification: low/intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very-high-risk groups. Patients with high- and very-high-risk PCa who were registered in the study received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy prior to RARP. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) after RARP in patients with PCa was the primary endpoint of this study. The secondary endpoint was the relationship between biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical covariates. We enrolled 230 patients with PCa in our study, with a median follow-up of 17.0 months. When the time of follow-up was over, 19 patients (8.3%) had BCR, and the 2 years BRFS rate for the enrolled patients was 90.9%. Although there was no significant difference in BRFS between the low- and intermediate-risk group and the high/very-high-risk group, the 2 years BRFS rate was 100% in the high-risk group and 68.3% in the very-high-risk group (P = 0.0029). Multivariate analysis showed that positive surgical margins were a significant predictor of BCR in patients with PCa treated with RARP. Multimodal therapies may be necessary to improve the BCR in patients with very-high-risk PCa.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Antígeno Prostático Específico
2.
Int J Urol ; 27(3): 244-248, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965649

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the optimal administration period of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transurethral enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: We carried out a randomized controlled trial to compare the differences in incidence of perioperative genitourinary tract infection between single and multiple (3 days) administrations of cefazolin for transurethral enucleation of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients without pyuria or bacteriuria between January 2015 and December 2018. RESULTS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial included 203 patients who underwent a transurethral enucleation of the prostate procedure. All received antimicrobial prophylaxis, and were randomized into those who received single-dose (n = 101) or multiple-dose (n = 102) therapy. The rate of genitourinary tract infection after transurethral enucleation of the prostate for all patients was 1.5%, whereas that in the single-dose group was 1.0% and in the multiple-dose group was 2.0%, which were not significantly different (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of antimicrobial prophylaxis as a prophylactic antibacterial drug is sufficient for patients undergoing transurethral enucleation of the prostate who do not have presurgical pyuria or bacteriuria.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Infecciones Urinarias , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
3.
Hinyokika Kiyo ; 61(9): 347-51, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26497860

RESUMEN

Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) used for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Treatment with sorafenib prolongs progression-free survival in patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. However, in spite of its therapeutic efficacy, sorafenib causes a wide range of adverse events. Cardiovascular adverse events have been observed when sorafenib was used with targeted agents. Although these adverse events like hypertension, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac ischemia or infarction were manageable with standard medical therapies in most cases, some had a poor clinical outcome. We report three cases of acute myocardial infarction associated with sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/inducido químicamente , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Sorafenib
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA