Clinical effect of home enteral tube feeding supplementation on nutritional status after esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction.

Body weight loss and poor nutritional status are frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to pilot an investigation on the impact of home enteral tube feeding supplementation (HES) for up to 3 months after esophageal cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 67 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We started HES from April 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Among 67 patients, 40 patients underwent HES between April 2017 and November 2020 (HES group). Other 27 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2012 and March 2017 were not administered HES (C group). Thereafter, multiple factors concerning patient nutritional status at long-term follow-up were evaluated. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in nutritional status scores before esophagectomy. The percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group both at 3 months and 1 year after surgery: 7.3% (-7.6 to 15.2), 7.7% (-4 to 13.9) in the HES group and 10.6% (-3.6 to 29.1), 10.8% (-5.8 to 20.0) in C group (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). In the patients with anastomotic stenosis, the percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group: 7.2% (2.0-14.9) and 14.6% (6.2-29.1), P < 0.05. HES may improve early weight loss in postesophagectomy patients.

5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin and mitomycin C as an optimized regimen for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimized drug regimens for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been standardized completely in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). We evaluated an optimized anti-tumor protocol comprising 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) and mitomycin C (MMC) in vitro for clinical use of HIPEC. METHODS: The sensitivities of 5-FU, CDDP, or MMC, alone or in combination, using different drug concentrations, exposure times, and hyperthermic conditions (42°C) were determined in vitro by the CD-DST method using 3 different differentiated GC cell lines. RESULTS: The tumor cell growth-inhibitory effect of 5-FU was concentration-dependent for all cell lines. In addition, 5-FU showed a hyperthermic sensitization effect at all drug concentrations for all cell lines. The appropriate concentration of each drug was 5-FU, 200 µg/mL; CDDP, 10 µg/mL; MMC, 2 µg/mL. Under hyperthermic conditions, most growth-inhibitory effects for each drug at 30 min was equivalent to 60 min of exposure; use of three drugs combined significantly inhibited growth compared with any of the drugs alone. CONCLUSION: An appropriate in vitro intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen for GC was combined use of 5-FU, CDDP, and MMC at 42°C for 30 min.

[Clinical Evaluation of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy(HIPEC)in Colorectal Cancer Patients at High Risk of Peritoneal Recurrence].

PURPOSE: We herein report the clinical outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC)in patients at high risk of colorectal peritoneal metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 21 patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were received HIPEC between 2009 and 2014. Retrospectively, we evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of these cases. RESULTS: We performed HIPEC for 12 patients with primary cancer and 9 with recurrent cancer. Perioperative complications characteristic of HIPEC did not occur. Seventeen patients(81%)had postoperative recurrence, 5 of whom had a peritoneal recurrence, and all of them already had synchronous peritoneal metastasis at the time of HIPEC. Patients with a higher peritoneal cancer index(PCI)had a tendency towards a higher rate of peritoneal recurrence than those with a lower PCI(11[median]vs 4; p=0.08).

[Stage IV Gastric Cancer with Positive Peritoneal Washing Cytology or Peritoneal Dissemination Was Successfully Treated with Gastrectomy and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy(HIPEC)Followed by Systemic Chemotherapy - A Report of Two Cases].

Survival of Stage IV gastric cancer is poor. We report 2 cases of Stage IV gastric cancer with positive peritoneal washing cytology or peritoneal dissemination that were successfully treated with gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy( HIPEC)followed by systemic chemotherapy. Case 1: A 59-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer and underwent gastrectomy with HIPEC. Her peritoneal washing cytology was positive during the gastrectomy. After the surgery, she underwent chemotherapy consisting of 8 courses of combination S-1 plus CPT-11 and 19 courses of PTX. It has been 5 years and 7 months since she had the surgery and she survives without recurrence of the cancer. Case 2: A 60-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal dissemination(peritoneal cancer index: 3 points). She underwent gastrectomy, hemi-colectomy, and HIPEC. After the surgery, she underwent chemotherapy, 35 courses of combination S-1 plus PSK/DOC, and 13 courses of S-1 plus PSK. It has been 5 years since her surgery and she survives without exacerbation of the cancer. These cases suggest a gastrectomy and HIPEC followed by systemic chemotherapy may represent an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer with a small amount of peritoneal metastasis.

[Salvage Surgery after CRT for Advanced Esophageal Cancer Resulting in a Pathological Complete Response and More Than Five Years' Survival].

A 62-year-old woman visited our hospital because of dysphagia. She was diagnosed with upper-middle esophageal type 4 cancer, which was 9 cm in length, according to the results of endoscopy. Squamous cell carcinoma was demonstrated using endoscopic biopsy. A CT scan revealed that the tumor had directly invaded into the trachea(cT4). Chemoradiotherapy(CRT) (5-FU and CDDP with 50 Gy of radiation)was administered. Although CT after CRT resulted in shrinkage of the tumor and no further tracheal invasion, esophageal stenosis remained. Therefore, salvage surgery(subtotal esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection)was performed. Pathologically, no carcinoma cells were found in the resected specimen and a com- plete response(grade 3)was diagnosed. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy(tegafur/uracil at 300mg/day per os) for 1 year. The patient is alive with no relapse of carcinoma more than 5 years after the first treatment.

Successful surgical approach for a patient with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare surgical complication that can occur after intraperitoneal treatment. It is also a serious and potentially fatal complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The present report describes a case of surgically treated EPS that probably occurred as a complication of hyperthermic intraperitonal chemotherapy (HIPEC). CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old man required sigmoidectomy for serosal invasive advanced sigmoid colon cancer. HIPEC with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C were given as adjuvant therapy. Subsequently, intestinal obstruction developed at 15 months postoperatively, and the patient was hospitalized. Abdominal computed tomography showed a dilated small intestine enveloped by a thickened membrane. We found no evidence of peritoneal recurrence, but exploratory surgery revealed EPS, probably caused by HIPEC. We peeled the capsule off of the intestine. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and sufficient nutritional intake after surgery was noted. Seven months after surgery, he is well with no recurrence. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment via peritonectomy and enterolysis for postoperative EPS appears safe and effective. A diagnosis of EPS should be considered when intestinal obstruction does not show improvement with conservative treatment in patients who have undergone HIPEC, provided the possibility of peritoneal cancer recurrence is excluded.