Role of the Alexandrite laser for removal of tattoos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The development of the Alexandrite laser for the removal of blue-black tattoos is described. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: The responses of an animal study, using professionally tattooed skin and a human study involving 22 (professional and nonprofessional) blue-black tattoos, to the Alexandrite laser are reported. RESULTS: Histopathologic evaluation of tattooed pig skin biopsies demonstrated the method of removal of dermal tattoo pigment. An average 11.6 treatments were required to remove completely the ten human blue-black professional tattoos compared to an average of 10.3 treatments to reach the same endpoint in six subjects with nonprofessional tattoos. CONCLUSION: Of significance was the fact that unlike the Q-switched Ruby and Nd:YAG lasers where punctate bleeding and tissue splattering have been reported to occur during laser tattoo removal, epidermal integrity was maintained during exposure of tattooed skin to the Q-switched Alexandrite laser at therapeutic fluences used.

Effect of cutaneous hypoxia upon erythema and pigment responses to UVA, UVB, and PUVA (8-MOP + UVA) in human skin.

The effect of oxygen deprivation upon UVA-, UVB-, and PUVA-induced pigment and erythema responses in normal human skin was examined. Before exposure, varying degrees of hypoxia in the skin of the forearm were achieved by inflating a sphygmomanometer cuff applied to the upper arm. After the transcutaneously measured pO2 had stabilized, sites on the inner forearm were exposed to UVA, UVB, or 8-MOP + UVA radiation, to determine dose thresholds for the induction of erythema and pigmentation at different cuff pressures. Inflation of the cuff to greater than systolic pressure completely inhibited immediate and delayed pigment responses (IPD, DT) to UVA doses greater than 10 times the normal pigmentation threshold dose. UVA-induced delayed erythema responses were partially inhibited by cuff inflation: 2.7 times the minimal erythema dose of UVA was necessary to cause an erythema response when exposure occurred during vascular occlusion. In contrast, erythema and pigment responses to UVB and PUVA were unaltered by cuff pressures exceeding systolic pressure during exposure. Inhibition of UVA-induced erythema and pigment responses by vascular occlusion were reversed by the transcutaneous diffusion of 100% O2. These findings indicate that the cutaneous responses to UVA and UVB occur by separate pathways differing with respect to O2 dependence. Our findings agree with those of other studies which indicate that PUVA-induced phototoxicity and melanogenesis are not O2-dependent.