[The role of the traditional surgical procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease cannot be ignored].

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disease with characteristics of a multitude of pathogenesis, a variety of clinical manifestations and a strong negative impact on physical and mental health of the patients. GERD is classified into non-erosive reflux disease and reflux esophagitis in terms of absence or presence of mucosal damage at endoscopic findings. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used in the treatment of GERD, especially for patients with non-erosive reflux disease or mild reflux esophagitis. However, PPI do not affect pathophysiologic mechanisms of GERD or reduce the number of reflux events. When PPI fails to adequately control the symptoms of GERD as a result of gastroesophagel junction structural defects, the antireflux surgical procedures are indicated to create a mechanical barrier to reflux. The laparoscopic fundoplication remains the most commonly performed and is the current "gold-standard" anti-reflux procedure. The outcomes of the antireflux surgical procedures are superior to medical therapy for GERD in light of subjective symptoms, objective examinations, quality of life and patient satisfaction. As of now, enough attention has not been paid to the traditional surgical procedures of GERD in China. It is controversial about which is optimal among the three major types of procedures, selection should be tailored to classification, mechanism, age, mental status and esophageal motility. GERD is a chronic disease and either medical or surgical therapy may put the patient at different risk, therefore the patient's preferences should be considered adequately before choosing the treatment protocols.

Therapeutic efficacy of atypical antipsychotic drugs by targeting multiple stress-related metabolic pathways.

Schizophrenia (SZ) is considered to be a multifactorial brain disorder with defects involving many biochemical pathways. Patients with SZ show variable responses to current pharmacological treatments of SZ because of the heterogeneity of this disorder. Stress has a significant role in the pathophysiological pathways and therapeutic responses of SZ. Atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs) can modulate the stress response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and exert therapeutic effects on stress by targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus. To evaluate the effects of AAPDs (such as clozapine, risperidone and aripiprazole) on stress, we compared neurochemical profile variations in the PFC and hippocampus between rat models of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for HPA axis activation and of long-term dexamethasone exposure (LTDE) for HPA axis inhibition, using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)-based metabolomic approach and a multicriteria assessment. We identified a number of stress-induced biomarkers comprising creatine, choline, inosine, hypoxanthine, uric acid, allantoic acid, lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPCs), phosphatidylethanolamines (PEs), corticosterone and progesterone. Specifically, pathway enrichment and correlation analyses suggested that stress induces oxidative damage by disturbing the creatine-phosphocreatine circuit and purine pathway, leading to excessive membrane breakdown. Moreover, our data suggested that the AAPDs tested partially restore stress-induced deficits by increasing the levels of creatine, progesterone and PEs. Thus, the present findings provide a theoretical basis for the hypothesis that a combined therapy using adenosine triphosphate fuel, antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids as supplements may have synergistic effects on the therapeutic outcome following AAPD treatment.