Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Top Med Chem ; 18(19): 1656-1676, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430939

RESUMEN

The identification of anxious symptoms is crucial to diagnose anxiety disorders, as well as to monitor their treatment in clinical practice and research. The aim of this review is to discuss the different ways of assessing anxiety in clinical research, including clinical trials, and the different kinds of animal behavioral tests used to study anxiety and test the efficacy of anxiolytics in pre-clinical studies. In clinical practice, a categorical classification (such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) distinguishes the cases of the disease versus non-disease. Some structured and semi-structured interviews can be used to arrive at these diagnoses. On the other hand, anxiety can also be assessed using a dimensional approach, through self-report or hetero-evaluation questionnaires. Regarding the assessment of anxiety in animals, several behavioral tests are described and evaluated, namely the Social Interaction Test, Elevated Plus Maze and Open Field Test. Under a critical view, these two approaches are presented and discussed, in order to improve the outcome of research in this field.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Animales , Humanos
2.
Curr Top Med Chem ; 18(19): 1677-1703, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430942

RESUMEN

Depression is deeply rooted in human behavior. The development of new antidepressants demands the creation of animal models to investigate new drugs, which potentially could work as antidepressants. The aim of this review is to discuss the different ways of assessing depression in clinical research, including clinical trials, and the different animal behavioral tests used to study depression and test the efficacy of antidepressants in pre-clinical studies. In clinical practice, a categorical classification, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) can be used for diagnosis, through the use of structured and semi-structured interviews. On the other hand, depression can also be assessed using a dimensional approach, through self- or clinicianrated questionnaires. Regarding the assessment of the efficacy of antidepressants in animal models, several tests are routinely used, namely the Forced Swim Test, the Modified Forced Swim Test, the Tail Suspension Test and the Sucrose Preference Test. These tests are informative, providing that the following rules are taken into account: 1) more than one test is used, with coherent results; 2) secondary drug effects, the most frequent being putative changes in motor activity, are taken into account and properly controlled with specific tests run concomitantly; 3) each test and specific protocol is validated with data from at least a gold standard antidepressant drug. We herein briefly discuss the potential and limitations of each of those tests.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Animales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Humanos
3.
Prog Transplant ; 24(3): 242-6, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25193724

RESUMEN

After transplant, patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy may manifest several medical and psychiatric symptoms that can be difficult to diagnose and treat. We describe 10 liver transplant candidates with familial amyloid polyneuropathy who had severe somatic signs and symptoms (nausea and vomiting) after transplant. Their physical examinations were performed by physicians from different specialties. Before transplant, the patients' evaluations did not reveal relevant medical or psychiatric symptoms. After transplant, they had severe nausea and vomiting and high scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A psychopharmacological trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor plus an antiemetic drug was unsuccessful. Remission was obtained with tricyclic antidepressants and low-dose atypical antipsychotic agents. Previous researchers had concluded that the mental quality of life in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy was worse after receiving a liver transplant, unlike other transplant recipients. The 10 cases described in this study are a good example of comorbid physical and mental symptoms occurring after transplant in patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy. The conclusions of this study have implications for clinical practice, showing how a careful holistic approach in the posttransplant period is relevant in these cases.


Asunto(s)
Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/psicología , Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/psicología , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/psicología , Adulto , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Ansiedad/psicología , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA