Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(1): 73-78, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984488

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Mortality among patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections varies between studies. We examined whether in vivo fitness of CRAB strains is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with CRAB infections. METHODS: Isolates were collected from patients enrolled in the AIDA trial with hospital-acquired pneumonia, bloodstream infections and/or urinary tract infections caused by CRAB. The primary outcome was 14-day clinical failure, defined as failure to meet all criteria: alive; haemodynamically stable; improved or stable Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; improved or stable oxygenation; and microbiological cure of bacteraemia. The secondary outcome was 14-day mortality. We tested in vivo growth using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Fitness was defined based on the CFU count 24 hours after injection of an inoculum of 105 CFU. We used mixed-effects logistic regression to test the association between fitness and the two outcomes. RESULTS: The sample included 266 patients; 215 (80.8%) experienced clinical failure. CRAB fitness ranged from 5.23 to 10.08 log CFU/g. The odds of clinical failure increased by 62% for every 1-log CFU/g increase in fitness (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.52). After adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and acquisition in the intensive care unit, fitness remained significant (adjusted OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03-2.59). CRAB fitness had a similar effect on 14-day mortailty, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.95-2.57). It became significant after adjusting for age, Charlson score, SOFA score and recent surgery (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09-3.25). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo CRAB fitness was associated with clinical failure in patients with CRAB infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Humanos , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
2.
Euro Surveill ; 25(23)2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553060

RESUMEN

BackgroundThe spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of worldwide concern. Public health policymakers and pharmaceutical companies pursuing antibiotic development require accurate predictions about the future spread of AMR.AimWe aimed to identify and model temporal and geographical patterns of AMR spread and to predict future trends based on a slow, intermediate or rapid rise in resistance.MethodsWe obtained data from five antibiotic resistance surveillance projects spanning the years 1997 to 2015. We aggregated the isolate-level or country-level data by country and year to produce country-bacterium-antibiotic class triads. We fitted both linear and sigmoid models to these triads and chose the one with the better fit. For triads that conformed to a sigmoid model, we classified AMR progression into one of three characterising paces: slow, intermediate or fast, based on the sigmoid slope. Within each pace category, average sigmoid models were calculated and validated.ResultsWe constructed a database with 51,670 country-year-bacterium-antibiotic observations, grouped into 7,440 country-bacterium-antibiotic triads. A total of 1,037 triads (14%) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 326 (31.4%) followed a sigmoid (logistic) pattern over time. Among 107 triads for which both sigmoid and linear models could be fit, the sigmoid model was a better fit in 84%. The sigmoid model deviated from observed data by a median of 6.5%; the degree of deviation was related to the pace of spread.ConclusionWe present a novel method of describing and predicting the spread of antibiotic-resistant organisms.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Modelos Teóricos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(9): 1185-1191, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251844

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In vitro models showing synergism between polymyxins and carbapenems support combination treatment for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CRGN) infections. We tested the association between the presence of in vitro synergism and clinical outcomes in patients treated with colistin plus meropenem. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of AIDA, a randomized controlled trial comparing colistin with colistin-meropenem for severe CRGN infections. We tested in vitro synergism using a checkerboard assay. Based on the fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC) index for each colistin-meropenem combination, we categorized results as synergistic, antagonistic or additive/indifferent. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 14 days. Secondary outcomes were 14- and 28-day mortality and microbiological failure. RESULTS: The sample included 171 patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 131), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 37) and Pseudomonas aeuruginosa (n = 3). In vitro testing showed synergism for 73 isolates, antagonism for 20 and additivism/indifference for 78. In patients who received any colistin plus meropenem, clinical failure at 14 days was 59/78 (75.6%) in the additivism/indifference group (reference category), 54/73 (74.0%) in the synergism group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.31-1.83), and 11/20 (55%) in the antagonism group (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.73). There was no significant difference between groups for any secondary outcome. Comparing the synergism group to patients treated with colistin monotherapy, synergism was not protective against 14-day clinical failure (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.04) or 14-day mortality (aOR1.09, 95% CI 0.60-1.96). DISCUSSION: In vitro synergism between colistin and meropenem via checkerboard method did not translate into clinical benefit.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27895014

RESUMEN

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a recently approved ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with the potential to treat serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms. Few patients with such infections were included in the CAZ-AVI clinical trials, and clinical experience is lacking. We present a case series of patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa) who were treated with CAZ-AVI salvage therapy on a compassionate-use basis. Physicians who had prescribed CAZ-AVI completed a case report form. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test to compare patients by treatment outcome. The sample included 36 patients infected with CRE and two with CRPa. The most common infections were intra-abdominal. Physicians categorized 60.5% of patients as having life-threatening infections. All but two patients received other antibiotics before CAZ-AVI, for a median of 13 days. The median duration of CAZ-AVI treatment was 16 days. Twenty-five patients (65.8%) concurrently received other antibiotics to which their pathogen was nonresistant in vitro Twenty-eight patients (73.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 56.9 to 86.6%) experienced clinical and/or microbiological cure. Five patients (20.8%) with documented microbiological cure died, whereas 10 patients (71.4%) with no documented microbiological cure died (P = 0.01). In three-quarters of cases, CAZ-AVI (alone or combined with other antibiotics) cured infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms, 95% of which had failed previous therapy. Microbiological cure was associated with improved survival. CAZ-AVI shows promising clinical results for infections for which treatment options are limited.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/patogenicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Klebsiella oxytoca/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella oxytoca/patogenicidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidad , Terapia Recuperativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA