Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 25(3): 843-6, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24820711

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of calcium sulfate (CaS) as a hemostatic agent after tooth extraction in patients with anticoagulant drug therapy. A total of 30 patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy (22 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 54.6 years (SD = 9.2 years), needing dental extractions, were selected for this study. They were divided into 2 groups, control (group 1) and test (group 2), in a randomized way. In group 1 patients, the postextraction socket was managed with obliterative suture only. Group 2 patients were treated with CaS placed into the postextraction sockets. All the patients did not interrupt the anticoagulant therapy during the dental treatment. The healing pattern was found to be approximately similar in all treatment groups, showing significant improvement at each consecutive visit. However, a statistically significant difference in the adequate hemostasis was evident between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.0056). The use of CaS helped to control the bleeding from inside the socket, producing instantly a very good hemostasis. Further studies are necessary to confirm the simplicity, possibilities, and limits of the proposed procedure.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Sulfato de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Extracción Dental , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Bucal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Alveolo Dental/cirugía , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
2.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 14(2): 184-97, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20030675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Procera AllCeram™ system (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) is a valid alternative to metal-ceramic restorations. However, limited long-term data of its use for single crowns on natural and implant-supported abutments are available. PURPOSE: The present study aimed at evaluating the clinical performances of Procera AllCeram single crowns in both anterior and posterior regions of the oral cavity either on natural tooth or implant abutments over a period of 6 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred nine single crowns were fabricated and used in 112 patients. Zinc phosphate and resin luting agents were used to cement the restorations. The crowns were evaluated according to the California Dental Association's quality assessment system. RESULTS: Three crowns were lost at follow-up. Of the 206 restorations, which completed the 6-year follow-up, 9 crowns were affected by mechanical complications and 7 crowns failed. All surviving crowns were ranked as either excellent or acceptable. Cumulative survival and success rates of 95.2 and 90.9%, respectively, were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, Procera AllCeram crowns proved to be a reliable clinical option to restore both anterior and posterior missing teeth either on natural or implant abutments. The resin cement used in the present study performed better than the zinc phosphate luting agent.


Asunto(s)
Cementación/métodos , Coronas , Pilares Dentales , Cementos Dentales/química , Implantes Dentales , Porcelana Dental/química , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Óxido de Aluminio/química , Resinas Compuestas/química , Adaptación Marginal Dental , Índice de Placa Dental , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Retención de Prótesis Dentales , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice Periodontal , Cementos de Resina/química , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estrés Mecánico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Cemento de Fosfato de Zinc/química
3.
World J Orthod ; 11(4): e133-44, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21490982

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare friction (F) of conventional and ceramic brackets (0.022-inch slot) using a model that tests the sliding of the archwire through 10 aligned brackets. METHODS: Polycrystalline alumina brackets (PCAs), PCA brackets with a stainless steel slot (PCA-M), and monocrystalline sapphire brackets (MCS) were tested under elastic ligatures using various archwires in dry and wet (saliva) states. Conventional stainless steel brackets were used as controls. RESULTS: In both dry and wet states, PCA and MCS brackets expressed a statistically significant higher F value with respect to stainless steel and PCA-M brackets when combined with the rectangular archwires (P<.01). PCA brackets showed significantly higher friction than MCS brackets (P<.01) when coupled with 0.014 x 0.025-inch nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) archwire. SEM analysis showed differences in the surfaces among stainless steel, MCS, PCA-M, and PCA brackets. In the wet state, the mean F values were generally higher than in the dry state. CONCLUSION: PCA brackets showed significantly higher F than MCS brackets only when combined with 0.014 x 0.025-inch Ni-Ti archwires. Thus, in this study, a 10 aligned-brackets study model showed similar results when compared to a single bracket system except for friction level with 0.014 × 0.025-inch Ni-Ti archwires.


Asunto(s)
Cerámica/química , Materiales Dentales/química , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Aleaciones/química , Óxido de Aluminio/química , Cristalografía , Aleaciones Dentales/química , Análisis del Estrés Dental/instrumentación , Desecación , Elastómeros/química , Fricción , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Níquel/química , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Alambres para Ortodoncia , Saliva/química , Acero Inoxidable/química , Propiedades de Superficie , Titanio/química
4.
J Periodontol ; 79(10): 1886-93, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18834243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of guided tissue regeneration with calcium sulfate graft and membrane (CS) versus guided tissue regeneration with collagen membrane (CM) or open flap debridement (OFD) only in terms of clinical attachment gain in periodontal intrabony defects. METHODS: Fifty-one systemically healthy, non-smoking subjects affected by moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were recruited. The subjects had one deep intrabony defect with a probing depth (PD) > or =6 mm and were randomly divided into three equal groups (17 subjects per group). Subjects were surgically treated with OFD (OFD group), OFD with CS (CS group), or OFD and CM (CM group). One year after surgical treatment, a complete clinical examination and a surgical reentry were performed. The pre- and post-therapy clinical parameters, including PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and intrasurgical parameters (defect bone level [DBL]), were compared. RESULTS: After 1 year, the clinical and intrasurgical parameters showed statistically significant changes from baseline within each group for all of the evaluated parameters (PD and CAL, P <0.001; GR and DBL, P <0.05). Differences (PD, CAL, and DBL, P <0.001; GR, P <0.05) were also seen across the three groups. The CM and CS groups had significantly smaller PD, CAL, and DBL values than subjects treated with only OFD. Groups treated with regenerative techniques had a significantly greater PD reduction and CAL and DBL gain compared to the OFD group. No significant differences were seen between CM and CS. Conversely, the CM group showed a significantly greater GR increase compared to OFD and CS. CONCLUSIONS: Both regenerative treatments produced additional clinical benefits over OFD alone. Moreover, the use of CS may minimize post-surgical recession.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/cirugía , Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Sulfato de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Colágeno , Desbridamiento , Regeneración Tisular Guiada Periodontal/métodos , Membranas Artificiales , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Adulto , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/clasificación , Proceso Alveolar/patología , Periodontitis Crónica/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recesión Gingival/clasificación , Recesión Gingival/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/clasificación , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/cirugía , Bolsa Periodontal/clasificación , Bolsa Periodontal/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Riv Biol ; 100(1): 39-54, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17592818

RESUMEN

Flavonoids are naturally occurring polyphenolic plant compounds that are capable of inhibiting histamine and cytokine release from several cells. Many studies suggest that flavonoids are anticancer agents with an apoptotic effect on tumor cells. Studies with animal tumour models have found vitamin deficiency to enhance susceptibility to chemical carcinogenesis and large doses of anti-oxidant vitamins and flavonoids to inhibit carcinogenesis. In some studies flavonoids and/or vitamins were found to reduce the predisposition to develop tumours in animals and humans. In conclusion, in this review we describe the role of flavonoids and vitamins in cancer.


Asunto(s)
Flavonoides/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA