Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Subst Use Misuse ; 56(5): 697-703, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33749499

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some ecological studies found lower rates of opioid overdose in states with liberalized cannabis legislation, but results are mixed, and the association has not been analyzed in individuals. We quantified the association between cannabis use and nonfatal opioid overdose among individuals enrolled in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) for opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: We recruited a convenience sample of individuals enrolled in four MMT clinics in Washington State and southern New England who completed a one-time survey.Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression compared the prevalence and risk of nonfatal opioid overdose in the past 12 months between participants reporting frequent (at least weekly) or infrequent (once or none) cannabis use in the past month. RESULTS: Of 446 participants, 35% (n = 156) reported frequent cannabis use and 7% (n = 32) reported nonfatal opioid overdose in the past year. The prevalence of nonfatal opioid overdose was 3% among reporters of frequent cannabis use, and 9% among reporters of infrequent/no use (p = 0.02). After imputing missing data and controlling for demographic and clinical factors, the likelihood of self-reported nonfatal opioid overdose in the past year was 71% lower among reporters of frequent cannabis use in the past month (adjusted RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.80, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals enrolled in MMT, frequent cannabis use in the past month was associated with fewer self-reported nonfatal opioid overdoses in the past year. Methodological limitations caution against causal interpretation of this relationship. Additional studies are needed to understand the prospective impact of co-occurring cannabis on opioid-related outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Sobredosis de Droga , Sobredosis de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , New England , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Washingtón/epidemiología
2.
Clin J Pain ; 33(3): 198-204, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428547

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain patients at increased risk of unfavorable pain and opioid misuse outcomes may be those most likely to use opioids long-term, but this has not been evaluated prospectively. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether pain prognostic risk, problem opioid use risk, and depression predict opioid use 1 year later among patients recently initiating opioid therapy with a moderate likelihood of long-term opioid use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Self-report and electronic health record data were collected from patients aged 45+ years who recently initiated opioid therapy (N=762), in an integrated health care system. Logistic regression models tested whether baseline patient chronic pain prognostic risk, problem opioid use risk, depression, and expectations concerning continued opioid use independently predicted continuing use at 1 year (≥30 d supply in the prior 4 mo). RESULTS: At 1 year, 46% of participants continued to use opioids. Baseline problem opioid use risk score (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.26) and expectations about continuing opioid use, but not pain prognostic risk score or depression, were significant predictors of 1-year opioid use. Compared with patients who thought continued opioid use unlikely, those who thought it was extremely or very likely had 4 times the odds of opioid use at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio, 4.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.59-6.31). DISCUSSION: The strongest predictors of long-term opioid use were not patient-related or medication-related factors, but expectations about using opioids in the future. Asking about such expectations may be the easiest way to identify patients likely to continue opioid use long-term.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Anticipación Psicológica , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 24(8): 629-35, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26153668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of chronic opioid therapy (COT) has risen dramatically in recent years, especially among women. However, little is known about factors influencing overall pain and function (global pain status) among COT users. Characterizing the typical experiences of COT patients by age-sex group could help clinicians and patients better weigh the risks and benefits of COT. Thus, we sought to characterize global pain status among COT users in community practice by age and sex. METHODS: Telephone survey of 2,163 health plan members aged 21-80 years using COT. We assessed average/usual pain (0-10 scale); pain-related interference (0-10); activity limitation days, last 3 months; and pain impact, last 2 weeks (0-11). Status on each indicator was classified as low (better pain/function), moderate, or high (worse pain/function). Global pain status was categorized as favorable if 2-4 indicators were low and 0-1 was high and unfavorable if 2-4 indicators were high and 0-1 was low. RESULTS: Among female COT patients, 15% (vs. 26% of males) had favorable global pain status and 59% (vs. 42% of males) had unfavorable status. Under age 65 years, women fared more poorly than men on every indicator. Among 65- to 80-year-olds, women and men had similar global pain status. CONCLUSIONS: Although pain and function among COT users vary considerably, only one in five reported low pain levels and high levels of function. Young and middle-aged women seem to be at particularly high risk for unfavorable global pain status. More research is needed about how to best manage pain in this group.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Esquema de Medicación , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Prevalencia , Distribución por Sexo , Teléfono , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 37(2): 139-43, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25554014

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Traditional analytic approaches may oversimplify the mechanisms by which interventions effect change. Transition probability models can quantify both symptom improvement and sustained reduction in symptoms. We sought to quantify transition probabilities between higher and lower states for four outcome variables and to compare two treatment arms with respect to these transitions. METHOD: Secondary analysis of a year-long collaborative care intervention for chronic musculoskeletal pain in veterans. Forty-two clinicians were randomized to intervention or treatment as usual (TAU), with 401 patients nested within clinician. The outcome variables, pain intensity, pain interference, depression and disability scores were dichotomized (lower/higher). Probabilities of symptom improvement (transitioning from higher to lower) or sustained reduction (remaining lower) were compared between intervention and TAU groups at 0- to 3-, 3- to 6- and 6- to 12-month intervals. General estimating equations quantified the effect of the intervention on transitions. RESULTS: In adjusted models, the intervention group showed about 1.5 times greater odds of both symptom improvement and sustained reduction compared to TAU, for all the outcomes except disability. CONCLUSIONS: Despite no formal relapse prevention program, intervention patients were more likely than TAU patients to experience continued relief from depression and pain. Collaborative care interventions may provide benefits beyond just symptom reduction.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Anciano , Conducta Cooperativa , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Veteranos
5.
Prev Med ; 66: 167-72, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24963895

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare reforms in the United States, including the Affordable Care and HITECH Acts, and the NCQA criteria for the Patient Centered Medical Home have promoted health information technology (HIT) and the integration of general medical and mental health services. These developments, which aim to improve chronic disease care, have largely occurred in parallel, with little attention to the need for coordination. In this article, the fundamental connections between HIT and improvements in chronic disease management are explored. We use the evidence-based collaborative care model as an example, with attention to health literacy improvement for supporting patient engagement in care. METHOD: A review of the literature was conducted to identify how HIT and collaborative care, an evidence-based model of chronic disease care, support each other. RESULTS: Five key principles of effective collaborative care are outlined: care is patient-centered, evidence-based, measurement-based, population-based, and accountable. The potential role of HIT in implementing each principle is discussed. Key features of the mobile health paradigm are described, including how they can extend evidence-based treatment beyond traditional clinical settings. CONCLUSION: HIT, and particularly mobile health, can enhance collaborative care interventions, and thus improve the health of individuals and populations when deployed in integrated delivery systems.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Aplicaciones de la Informática Médica , Informática Médica , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Conducta Cooperativa , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Estados Unidos
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(2): 305-11, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24142119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to epidemic levels of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and diversion, routine urine drug tests (UDTs) are recommended for patients receiving chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic pain. However, UDT ordering for COT patients is inconsistent in primary care, and little is known about how to increase UDT ordering or the impact of increased testing on rates of aberrant results. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates and results of UDTs for COT patients before versus after implementation of an opioid risk reduction initiative in a large healthcare system. DESIGN: Pre-post observational study. PATIENTS: Group Health patients on COT October 2008-September 2009 (N = 4,821), October 2009-September 2010 (N = 5,081), and October 2010-September 2011 (N = 5,498). INTERVENTION: Multi-faceted opioid risk reduction initiative. MAIN MEASURES: Annual rates of UDTs and UDT results. KEY RESULTS: Half of COT patients received at least one UDT in the year after the initiative was implemented, compared to only 7 % 2 years prior. The adjusted odds of COT patients having at least one UDT in the first year of the opioid initiative were almost 16 times (adjusted OR = 15.79; 95 % CI: 13.96-17.87) those 2 years prior. The annual rate of UDT detection of marijuana and illicit drugs did not change (12.6 % after initiative implementation), and largely reflected marijuana use (detected in 11.1 % of all UDTs in the year after initiative implementation). In the year after initiative implementation, 10.7 % of UDTs were negative for opioids. CONCLUSIONS: The initiative appeared to dramatically increase urine drug testing of COT patients in the healthcare system without impacting rates of aberrant results. The large majority of aberrant results reflected marijuana use or absence of opioids in the urine. The utility of increased urine drug testing for COT patient safety and prevention of diversion remains uncertain.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/orina , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/tendencias , Urinálisis/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/normas , Urinálisis/normas
7.
Gerontol Geriatr Educ ; 32(1): 38-53, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21347930

RESUMEN

The scope of geriatrics-related educational offerings in large health care systems, in either the target audiences or topics covered, has not previously been analyzed or reported in the professional literature. The authors reviewed the geriatrics-related educational sessions that were provided between 1999 and 2009 by the Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (GRECCs) and the Employee Education System (EES) of the United States' largest integrated health care system, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Using records of attendance and content at local training events and regional and national conferences, the authors estimated the number of attendees in different health disciplines and the number and types of lectures. During the past 11 years, GRECCs and EES provided geriatric-related educational sessions to about one third of a million attendees, most of them nurses and physicians, in about 15,000 lectures. About three-fourths of the educational events occurred through local, rather than regional or national, events. Lectures covered a wide variety of topics, with a particular emphasis on dementia and other mental health topics. A comparison of the number of potential learners in VHA with the number of geriatric-related educational presentations over this time period yields an average of one offering per VHA provider every 3 years; most providers likely never received any. Since 1999 the GRECCs have been the dominant source for geriatrics-related education for VHA health professionals, but given that about one half of VHA patients are older than age 65, there is still a large unmet need to provide geriatric education to VHA providers. Examination of the GRECC resources that have been put to use in the past to develop and deliver the face-to-face education experiences described sheds light on the magnitude of resources that might be required to address remaining unmet need in the future, and supports the prediction that there will need to be increasing reliance on distance learning and other alternatives to face-to-face educational modalities.


Asunto(s)
Geriatría/educación , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Educación Médica Continua , Evaluación Educacional , Escolaridad , Humanos , Desarrollo de Personal , Enseñanza , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
8.
Prim Care ; 34(3): 571-92, vii, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17868760

RESUMEN

Mental health and primary care delivery systems have evolved to operate differently. For example, attention to multiple medical issues, health maintenance, and structured diagnostic procedures are standard elements of primary care rarely incorporated into mental health care. A multidisciplinary treatment approach, group care, and case management are common features of mental health treatment settings only rarely used in primary care practices. Advances in treatments for mental health disorders and increased knowledge of the integral link between mental health and physical health encourage mental health disorder treatment in primary care settings, which reach the most patients. Effective integration of mental health care into primary care requires systematic and pragmatic change that builds on the strengths of both mental health and primary care.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA