Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Iberoam Micol ; 36(1): 37-40, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30765275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of systemic infections by Saccharomyces cerevisiae has increased in recent years, especially among immunocompromised patients. Amphotericin B, voriconazole or echinocandins have been used with favorable outcome against systemic infections by this fungus. However, clinical experience is limited and no in vivo studies have been conducted. AIMS: We evaluated the in vitro activity of nine antifungal compounds against S.cerevisiae and the in vivo efficacy of those three antifungals showing the highest in vitro activity by using a murine model of systemic infection. METHODS: Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the microdilution method against three strains of S. cerevisiae. After intravenous infection with 5×107 CFUs, animals received liposomal amphotericin B (5mg/kg), voriconazole (25mg/kg) or anidulafungin (5mg/kg). Treatment efficacy was assessed by determining of CFUs/g in liver, kidney, brain, lung and spleen. RESULTS: 5-Fluorocytosine was the most in vitro active compound followed by amphotericin B, voriconazole and anidulafungin. The in vivo study showed that liposomal amphotericin B was the most effective drug driving highest fungal clearance. CONCLUSIONS: All treatments reduced the fungal load in comparison to the control group, being liposomal amphotericin B the most effective drug followed by anidulafungin and finally voriconazole.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Equinocandinas/farmacología , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/efectos de los fármacos , Voriconazol/farmacología , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
2.
Mycoses ; 60(2): 112-117, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27696562

RESUMEN

Cryptococcus albidus and Cryptococcus laurentii are uncommon species of this genus that in recent decades have increasingly caused opportunistic infections in humans, mainly in immunocompromised patients; the best therapy for such infection being unknown. Using a murine model of systemic infection by these fungi, we have evaluated the efficacy of amphotericin B (AMB) at 0.8 mg/kg, administered intravenously, fluconazole (FLC) or voriconazole (VRC), both administered orally, at 25 mg/kg and the combination of AMB plus VRC against three C. albidus and two C. laurentii strains. All the treatments significantly reduced the fungal burden in all the organs studied. The combination showed a synergistic effect in the reduction in fungal load, working better than both monotherapies. The histopathological study confirmed the efficacy of the treatments.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Criptococosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Criptococosis/microbiología , Cryptococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Animales , Criptococosis/sangre , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Pulmón/microbiología , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Bazo/microbiología , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA