Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Microbiol ; 16(1): 205, 2016 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27599570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated how dosing regimen for intramuscularly-administered ampicillin, composition of Escherichia coli strains with regard to ampicillin susceptibility, and excretion of bacteria from the intestine affected the level of resistance among Escherichia coli strains in the intestine of nursery pigs. It also examined the dynamics of the composition of bacterial strains during and after the treatment. The growth responses of strains to ampicillin concentrations were determined using in vitro growth curves. Using these results as input data, growth predictions were generated using a mathematical model to simulate the competitive growth of E. coli strains in a pig intestine under specified plasma concentration profiles of ampicillin. RESULTS: In vitro growth results demonstrated that the resistant strains did not carry a fitness cost for their resistance, and that the most susceptible strains were more affected by increasing concentrations of antibiotics that the rest of the strains. The modeling revealed that short treatment duration resulted in lower levels of resistance and that dosing frequency did not substantially influence the growth of resistant strains. Resistance levels were found to be sensitive to the number of competing strains, and this effect was enhanced by longer duration of treatment. High excretion of bacteria from the intestine favored resistant strains over sensitive strains, but at the same time it resulted in a faster return to pre-treatment levels after the treatment ended. When the duration of high excretion was set to be limited to the treatment time (i.e. the treatment was assumed to result in a cure of diarrhea) resistant strains required longer time to reach the previous level. CONCLUSION: No fitness cost was found to be associated with ampicillin resistance in E. coli. Besides dosing factors, epidemiological factors (such as number of competing strains and bacterial excretion) influenced resistance development and need to be considered further in relation to optimal treatment strategies. The modeling approach used in the study is generic, and could be used for prediction of the effect of treatment with other drugs and other administration routes for effect on resistance development in the intestine of pigs.


Asunto(s)
Ampicilina/farmacología , Ampicilina/farmacocinética , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/crecimiento & desarrollo , Escherichia coli/patogenicidad , Intestinos/microbiología , Ampicilina/administración & dosificación , Ampicilina/sangre , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/sangre , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carga Bacteriana , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Heces/microbiología , Inyecciones Intramusculares/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
BMC Microbiol ; 16(1): 118, 2016 06 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338861

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combination treatment is increasingly used to fight infections caused by bacteria resistant to two or more antimicrobials. While multiple studies have evaluated treatment strategies to minimize the emergence of resistant strains for single antimicrobial treatment, fewer studies have considered combination treatments. The current study modeled bacterial growth in the intestine of pigs after intramuscular combination treatment (i.e. using two antibiotics simultaneously) and sequential treatments (i.e. alternating between two antibiotics) in order to identify the factors that favor the sensitive fraction of the commensal flora. Growth parameters for competing bacterial strains were estimated from the combined in vitro pharmacodynamic effect of two antimicrobials using the relationship between concentration and net bacterial growth rate. Predictions of in vivo bacterial growth were generated by a mathematical model of the competitive growth of multiple strains of Escherichia coli. RESULTS: Simulation studies showed that sequential use of tetracycline and ampicillin reduced the level of double resistance, when compared to the combination treatment. The effect of the cycling frequency (how frequently antibiotics are alternated in a sequential treatment) of the two drugs was dependent upon the order in which the two drugs were used. CONCLUSION: Sequential treatment was more effective in preventing the growth of resistant strains when compared to the combination treatment. The cycling frequency did not play a role in suppressing the growth of resistant strains, but the specific order of the two antimicrobials did. Predictions made from the study could be used to redesign multidrug treatment strategies not only for intramuscular treatment in pigs, but also for other dosing routes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Ampicilina/farmacocinética , Ampicilina/farmacología , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Carga Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Quimioterapia Combinada , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/crecimiento & desarrollo , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Intestinos/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Porcinos , Tetraciclina/farmacocinética , Tetraciclina/farmacología
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(3): 1634-42, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25547361

RESUMEN

High instances of antimicrobial resistance are linked to both routine and excessive antimicrobial use, but excessive or inappropriate use represents an unnecessary risk. The competitive growth advantages of resistant bacteria may be amplified by the strain dynamics; in particular, the extent to which resistant strains outcompete susceptible strains under antimicrobial pressure may depend not only on the antimicrobial treatment strategies but also on the epidemiological parameters, such as the composition of the bacterial strains in a pig. This study evaluated how variation in the dosing protocol for intramuscular administration of tetracycline and the composition of bacterial strains in a pig affect the level of resistance in the intestine of a pig. Predictions were generated by a mathematical model of competitive growth of Escherichia coli strains in pigs under specified plasma concentration profiles of tetracycline. All dosing regimens result in a clear growth advantage for resistant strains. Short treatment duration was found to be preferable, since it allowed less time for resistant strains to outcompete the susceptible ones. Dosing frequency appeared to be ineffective at reducing the resistance levels. The number of competing strains had no apparent effect on the resistance level during treatment, but possession of fewer strains reduced the time to reach equilibrium after the end of treatment. To sum up, epidemiological parameters may have more profound influence on growth dynamics than dosing regimens and should be considered when designing improved treatment protocols.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Tetraciclina/farmacología , Tetraciclina/farmacocinética , Animales , Protocolos Clínicos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intramusculares/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA