Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Urol ; 27(3): 244-248, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965649

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the optimal administration period of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transurethral enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: We carried out a randomized controlled trial to compare the differences in incidence of perioperative genitourinary tract infection between single and multiple (3 days) administrations of cefazolin for transurethral enucleation of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients without pyuria or bacteriuria between January 2015 and December 2018. RESULTS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial included 203 patients who underwent a transurethral enucleation of the prostate procedure. All received antimicrobial prophylaxis, and were randomized into those who received single-dose (n = 101) or multiple-dose (n = 102) therapy. The rate of genitourinary tract infection after transurethral enucleation of the prostate for all patients was 1.5%, whereas that in the single-dose group was 1.0% and in the multiple-dose group was 2.0%, which were not significantly different (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of antimicrobial prophylaxis as a prophylactic antibacterial drug is sufficient for patients undergoing transurethral enucleation of the prostate who do not have presurgical pyuria or bacteriuria.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Infecciones Urinarias , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
2.
Int J Urol ; 25(5): 479-485, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29577437

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of cernitin pollen extract on serum prostate-specific antigen level prostate biopsy candidates, and to develop an ideal protocol to avoid an unnecessary biopsy procedure. METHODS: A total of 61 patients were administrated cernitin pollen extract tablets (two tablets t.i.d.) for 30 days, and then underwent a prostate biopsy with ≥12 systematic and targeted biopsy cores obtained. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels were examined before and after administration of the pollen extract, and the change in serum prostate-specific antigen and the rate of change were analyzed in relation to negative and positive biopsy results for cancer. RESULTS: The mean change in serum prostate-specific antigen and rate of change after administration of cernitin pollen extract in all patients were -0.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL and -7.6 ± 16.1%, respectively, which were significantly different from the baseline values (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0005, respectively). When prostate-specific antigen change values and rates were compared between patients negative and positive for cancer, a significant difference between those groups was observed (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to show that an ideal protocol using cernitin pollen extract has the potential to avoid an unnecessary prostate biopsy procedure in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen, possibly caused by inflammation. Additional studies with greater numbers of participants are required to confirm our findings and develop an ideal protocol.


Asunto(s)
Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Prostatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Curva ROC , Secale , Procedimientos Innecesarios
3.
Hinyokika Kiyo ; 56(7): 367-70, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20724809

RESUMEN

We have performed transurethral enucleation with bipolar system (TUEB) on 60 patients since April 2008. The patients were 61 to 81 years old (average 71.7 years old), and estimated prostate volumes were 25 cm3 to 80.43 cm3 (average 51.1 cm3). The weight of prostate removed was 8 g to 56 g (average 27.4 g) during the operations which lasted between 40 min to 200 min (average 117.5 min). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life index (QOL) maximum flow rate (Q max) and average flow rate (Qave) were recorded before operation, and at 1 and at 3 months after operation. The results indicated a high safety with TUEB compared to TUR-P even for beginners. In conclusion, TUEB may become the most common approach in the treatment of BPH.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA