Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with ciprofloxacin for the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis with low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been shown to be cost-effective in the prevention of urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, urosepsis, and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Ciprofloxacin, effective against almost all urinary tract pathogens in this patient population, represents a promising alternative prophylactic agent for patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole due to toxicity. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with ciprofloxacin for the prevention of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients. Patients received either ciprofloxacin (250 mg) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (80 mg trimethoprim, 400 mg sulfamethoxazole) daily for 6 months following transplantation. Treatment was considered successful if patients completed the 6-month course and 3-month follow-up period without evidence of urinary tract infection or drug-related toxicities. RESULTS: Of 103 eligible patients, 51 received ciprofloxacin and 52 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. At 6 months, treatment was successful in 75% (38 of 51) receiving ciprofloxacin and 71% (37 of 52) treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.87, relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence limits 0.83 to 1.33). Thirteen patients (25%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole withdrew from the study-4 for resistant urinary tract infection and 9 for drug-related toxicity, while 3 (6%) of the patients receiving ciprofloxacin withdrew because of drug-related toxicity (P = 0.016, relative risk of urinary tract infection or adverse event 0.24, 95% confidence limits 0.07 to 0.78). At 9 months, all 38 patients who completed the 6-month course of ciprofloxacin remained free of urinary tract infection, while an additional 4 patients who had received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis (total of 8 patients over the 9 months) developed urinary tract infections (P = 0.006, Fisher's exact test for urinary tract infection alone). Pneumocystis pneumonia occurred in a total of 7 (14%) patients who were randomized to ciprofloxacin, but 2 of the 7 had withdrawn from the study at least 2 weeks prior to the diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia. There were no cases of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.006). Following completion of the study, monthly aerosolized pentamidine administered in conjunction with ciprofloxacin has provided complete protection against urinary tract infection and pneumocystis pneumonia in 30 transplant recipients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin is at least as effective as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients, and is better tolerated. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is associated with a higher incidence of pneumocystis pneumonia than is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. An uncontrolled follow-up study suggests that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis combined with monthly aerosolized pentamidine may be efficacious in preventing both urinary tract infection and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients.

Ciprofloxacin in management of urinary tract infection.

Ciprofloxacin is a new quinolone derivative which is particularly well adapted for the treatment of bacterial urinary tract infection. Virtually all uropathogens are susceptible, and the development of resistance is uncommon. Its pharmacokinetic characteristics reveal that effective concentrations of the drug are easily achieved with twice a day oral therapy in the blood, urine, kidneys, and prostate--even in advanced renal failure. The drug is well tolerated, even with prolonged courses of therapy. It will be particularly useful in the treatment of antibiotic-resistant, complicated, and/or prostatic infection.

New approaches to the treatment of urinary tract infection.

The term urinary tract infection encompasses a broad range of clinical entities, each with its own pathology and each requiring its own form of treatment. There are at least four different modes in which antimicrobial therapy may be prescribed for urinary tract infection: single-dose therapy aimed at patients with superficial mucosal infection; a conventional seven- to 14-day course of therapy; a prolonged four- to six-week course of therapy for patients with deep tissue infection; and low-dose prophylactic therapy. Increasingly, the response to single-dose therapy is being utilized to delineate the mode of therapy needed by a patient. Patients with underlying renal disease and/or structural abnormalities of the urinary tract are prone to the development of recurrent urinary tract infection, frequently with bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents conventionally employed to treat the infection. There has been a steady increase, even among otherwise normal persons with urinary tract infection, in the level of antimicrobial resistance exhibited by bacterial uropathogens to the drugs commonly used to treat these infections. The quinolones in general, and ciprofloxacin in particular, appear to be very promising for the treatment of urinary tract infection. It will be important to evaluate the performance of this drug in the four different therapeutic modes and in patients with renal dysfunction or anatomic abnormalities of the urinary tract.

Single-dose amoxicillin therapy of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.

Of 210 women who were experiencing dysuria, frequent urination, pyuria, and significant bacteriuria and who were treated with a single 3-g dose of amoxicillin, 165 (79%) were cured of their original infections. Patients with infections that were negative by antibody-coated-bacteria assay were cured at a significantly higher rate than those with infections that were positive by antibody-coated-bacteria assay (90 versus 59%; P less than 0.001). Similarly, those with infections caused by amoxicillin-susceptible organisms were cured at a significantly higher rate than those with infections caused by resistant organisms (85 versus 50%; P less than 0.001). Of 27 patients who had infections caused by amoxicillin-susceptible organisms and who had relapses after single-dose therapy, 14 (52%) had relapses again after a conventional 10-day course of therapy, although all responded to a 6-week course. An additional 27 patients experiencing dysuria, frequent urination, and pyuria but who had a lower number of uropathogens in the urine (10(2) to 10(4.5)/ml of urine) were treated with single-dose therapy, with a 100% eradication of organisms and an 89% rate of symptomatic relief.

Amoxicillin and potassium clavulanate: an antibiotic combination. Mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial spectrum, clinical efficacy and adverse effects.

The combination of amoxicillin and potassium clavulanate will soon be marketed in 2:1 and 4:1 fixed ratio dosage forms. In vitro and in vivo evidence suggests that clavulanic acid, a potent inhibitor of many bacterial beta-lactamase enzymes, will increase the spectrum of amoxicillin to include, at achievable serum concentrations, Haemophilus influenzae, H. ducreyi, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Staphylococcus aureus and Branhamella catarralis and, at achievable urine levels, many beta-lactamase-producing strains of E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus and Citrobacter. Both amoxicillin and clavulanic are well absorbed after oral administration, reach peak serum levels in 40-120 min and have similar half-lives of 45 to 90 min. This combination will be suitable for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, otitis media, sinusitis and respiratory tract infections. However, precise recommendations for its use will need to await further clinical trials that compare amoxicillin/clavulanate to alternative therapies.