Cost-effectiveness of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (H-GPI) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), from a UK health service perspective. DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis with life-long time horizon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Event risks and medical resource use data derived from the HORIZONS-AMI trial were entered into a decision analytic model. Clinical events until the end of year 1 (main model) or year 3 (alternative model) were modelled in detail. Adjustments were applied to approximate UK routine practice characteristics. Life expectancy of 1-year or 3-year survivors, health-state utilities, initial hospitalisation length of stay in the comparator strategy and unit costs were based on UK sources. Costs and effects were discounted at 3.5%. RESULTS: The main model predicted bivalirudin and H-GPI patients to survive 11.52 and 11.35 (undiscounted) years on average, respectively, and to accrue 6.26 and 6.17 QALYs. Patient lifetime costs were £267 lower in the bivalirudin strategy (£12 843 vs £13 110). Extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses confirmed these results to be robust. In probabilistic analysis, quality-adjusted survival was higher and costs were lower with bivalirudin in 95.0% of simulation runs. In 99.2%, cost-effectiveness was better than £20 000 per QALY gained. Results from the alternative model were fully consistent. CONCLUSION: The use of bivalirudin instead of H-GPI in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI is cost-effective, and offers a high probability of dominance. Background treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel is assumed.

Airway function, oedema, cell infiltration and nitric oxide generation in conscious ozone-exposed guinea-pigs: effects of dexamethasone and rolipram.

1. The effects of ozone inhalation (90 min, 2.15+/-0.05 p.p.m.) and their modification by dexamethasone (20 mg kg(-1)) or the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, rolipram (1 mg kg(-1)), administered (i.p.) 24 and 0.5 h before and 24 h after ozone exposure were examined in conscious guinea-pigs. 2. Ozone caused an early-phase bronchoconstriction (EPB) as a fall in specific airways conductance (sG(aw)) measured by whole body plethysmography, followed at 5 h by a late-phase bronchoconstriction (LPB) and increased respiratory rate. Rolipram did not alter this profile but dexamethasone inhibited the EPB. 3. Airway hyperreactivity to inhaled histamine (1 mM, 20 s) occurred at 0.5, 2, 12, 24 and 48 h after ozone inhalation, the 2 h change being abolished by rolipram and dexamethasone. 4. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) macrophages, eosinophils and neutrophils were significantly (P<0.05) elevated at 12, 24 and 48 h after ozone exposure, the 48 h influx being significantly attenuated (P<0.05) by rolipram and dexamethasone. 5. BALF nitric oxide (NO) metabolites decreased 0.5 h after ozone exposure by 52%, recovered at 2 h and significantly increased at 12 (101%) and 24 h (127%). The elevated NO was unaffected by rolipram or dexamethasone. 6. Lung oedema, measured from wet/dry weight differences, was significant 12, 24 and 48 h after ozone exposure, the latter being significantly attenuated (P<0.05) by rolipram and dexamethasone. 7. Ozone exposure of guinea-pigs produced features common to COPD. Although rolipram and dexamethasone did not affect the airway function changes, they inhibited the inflammation, airway hyperreactivity and oedema.