Litotricia por ondas de choque con música: un tratamiento menos doloroso y más satisfactorio / Shockwave lithotripsy with music: Less painful and more satisfactory treatment

Introducción: El objetivo del estudio fue determinar si escuchar música durante una sesión de litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque (LEOC) mejora el dolor de los pacientes. Material y método: Se realizó una aleatorización simple y oculta de pacientes con litiasis renales o ureterales que acudieron por vez primera a una sesión de LEOC de 7.000 ondas, entre septiembre y diciembre de 2014. Un grupo recibió música mientras que el otro no. Se registraron la edad, sexo, localización de la litiasis (renal/ureteral) y 2 cuestionarios pre-LEOC (cuestionario A) y post-LEOC (cuestionario B). Cada cuestionario contiene una pregunta sobre ansiedad y otra sobre dolor en escala Likert (0 al 10). El B, además, contiene otra sobre satisfacción y otra sobre comodidad (Likert 0 al 10). Otras variables fueron la frecuencia cardiaca, respiratoria, tensión arterial sistólica y diastólica en la onda 2.000, 5.000 y 7.000, causa de interrupción del procedimiento, petidina total (mg), analgesia secundaria, energía (J) y frecuencia (Hz). Se realizó un análisis bivariante con t de Student, X2/Fisher y un modelo de regresión lineal múltiple. Resultados: La muestra incluyó a 95 pacientes, con una media de edad de 52 años (±13), 35 mujeres (36,84%), 60 hombres (63,2%); 25 para litiasis ureterales (26,3%) y 70 (26,3%) para renales (73,7%). Un total de 42 pacientes (44,2%) pacientes recibieron música. No hubo diferencias entre las variables demográficas ni en las puntuaciones del cuestionario A. La satisfacción y el dolor fueron mejores en el cuestionario B con música. Conclusión: La música es capaz de disminuir el dolor y mejorar la satisfacción del paciente en los tratamientos con LEOC. Más estudios son necesarios para comprobar este efecto

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine whether listening to music during a session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) improves patients' pain. Material and method: A simple, blind randomisation was undertaken of patients with kidney and ureter stones attending an ESWL session of 7,000 waves for the first time, between September and December 2014. One group was given music and the other was not. The age, gender, location of stones (kidney/ureter) were recorded and 2 questionnaires: pre ESWL (questionnaire A) and postESWL (questionnaire B). Each questionnaire contained a question about anxiety and another question on pain on the Likert scale (0-10). Questionnaire B also had a question on satisfaction and comfort (Likert 0-10). Other variables included heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure on wave 2,000, 5,000 and 7,000, reason for halting the procedure, total pethidine (mg), secondary analgesia, energy (J) and frequency (Hz). Bivariate analysis using the Student's t-test, X2/Fisher test and a multiple linear regression model. Results: The sample comprised 95 patients, with a mean age of 52 (±13) years, 35 (36.84%) females, 60 (63.2%) males. A total of 25 (26.3%) ureter stones and 70 (73.7%) kidney stones. A number of 42 (44.2%) patients were given music. There were no differences between the demographic variables or questionnaire A scores. Satisfaction and pain were better on questionnaire B with music. Conclusion: Music can reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction in ESWL treatment. More studies are required to confirm this effect

Shockwave lithotripsy with music: Less painful and more satisfactory treatment. / Litotricia por ondas de choque con música: un tratamiento menos doloroso y más satisfactorio.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine whether listening to music during a session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) improves patients' pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A simple, blind randomisation was undertaken of patients with kidney and ureter stones attending an ESWL session of 7,000 waves for the first time, between September and December 2014. One group was given music and the other was not. The age, gender, location of stones (kidney/ureter) were recorded and 2questionnaires: pre ESWL (questionnaire A) and postESWL (questionnaire B). Each questionnaire contained a question about anxiety and another question on pain on the Likert scale (0-10). Questionnaire B also had a question on satisfaction and comfort (Likert 0-10). Other variables included heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure on wave 2,000, 5,000 and 7,000, reason for halting the procedure, total pethidine (mg), secondary analgesia, energy (J) and frequency (Hz). Bivariate analysis using the Student's t-test, X2/Fisher test and a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The sample comprised 95 patients, with a mean age of 52 (±13) years, 35 (36.84%) females, 60 (63.2%) males. A total of 25 (26.3%) ureter stones and 70 (73.7%) kidney stones. A number of 42 (44.2%) patients were given music. There were no differences between the demographic variables or questionnaire A scores. Satisfaction and pain were better on questionnaire B with music. CONCLUSION: Music can reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction in ESWL treatment. More studies are required to confirm this effect.

[Comparative study between tobramicin and tobramicin plus ciprofloxacin in transrectal prostate biopsy prophylaxis]. / Estudio comparativo entre tobramicina y tobramicina más ciprofloxacino como profilaxis para la biopsia transrectal de próstata.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of tobramicin and tobramicin + ciprofloxacin for prevention of transrectal prostatic biopsy infectious complications. We revised our complications, microorganism most common in the infectious complications, and their sensibility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective and randomized study in 153 patients with 157 prostatic biopsies. The 71 patients in group A were treated with intramuscular tobramicin 100 mg, one dose 30 minutes before biopsy and another one 8 hours afterwards. The 85 patients in group B were treated with the same tobramicin doses and oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg, one dose 30 minutes before biopsy and afterwards they continue with the ciprofloxacin every 12 hours during 3 days. RESULTS: we did 71 biopsies in group A and 86 in group B. 50 (31,8%) patients had hematuria, 20 (12,7%) fever, 15 (9,5%) hemospermia, 7 (4,4%) perineal pain, one (1,2%) orchiepididymitis and another one (1,2%) urinary retention. The patients who had fever were 15 of the group A and 5 of the group B (p=0,004). A total of 15 (21,1%) patients with fever of the group A needed to be treated in the hospital and 3 patients (3,5%) of the group B (p=0,0006). E. coli growthed in 67% of the blood cultures and amoxicillin-clavulanic, tobramicin and third generation of cephalosporins were the antibiotics more eficacious. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis scheme with tobramicin plus ciprofloxacin was more efficacy that tobramicina alone in transrectal prostatic biopsy. Hematuria was the most common complication. E. coli was the microorganism most frequent in infectious complications after prostatic biopsy and amoxicillin-clavulanic, tobramicin and third generation of cephalosporins the most effective antibiotics in our hospital.

Estudio comparativo entre tobramicina y tobramicina más ciprofloxacino como profilaxis para la biopsia transrectal de próstata / Comparative study between tobramicin and tobramicin plus ciprofloxacin in transrectal prostate biopsy prophylaxis

Introducción y Objetivos: Estudio de eficacia en la prevención de complicaciones infecciosas tras biopsia transrectal de próstata. Revisión de las complicaciones infecciosas y microorganismo implicados. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado en 153 pacientes en los que se realizaron 157 biopsias de próstata. El Grupo A (71 pacientes) recibieron tobramicina 100 mg una dosis intravenosa media hora antes de la biopsia y otra intramuscular a las 8 horas de la primera, y los del Grupo B (85 pacientes) recibieron el mismo esquema de tobramicina y añadiendo ciprofloxacino oral 500 mg media hora antes de la biopsia continuando luego con una dosis cada 12 horas durante tres días. Resultados: en el Grupo A se realizaron 71 biopsias y en el Grupo B 86. 50 pacientes (31,8%) presentaron hematuria, 20 (12,7%) fiebre, 15 (9,5%) hemospermia, 7 (4,4%) dolor perineal, uno (1,2%) orquiepididimitis y otro (1,2%) retención urinaria. De los pacientes con fiebre 15 pertenecen al grupo A y 5 al grupo B (p=0,004). Ingresaron por fiebre 15 (21,1%) pacientes del grupo A y 3 (3,5%) del grupo B (p=0,0006). En el 67% de los hemocultivos se aisló E. Coli. Conclusiones: La pauta profiláctica consistente en tobramicina más ciprofloxacino resultó ser más eficaz en la prevención de ingresos por fiebre post-biopsia que la tobramicina sola. La complicación más frecuente fue la hematuria. El microorganismo más frecuentemente fue E. Coli sensible, en nuestro hospital, a amoxicilina-clavulánico, tobramicina y cefalosporinas de tercera generación

Introduction and objectives: To compare the efficacy of tobramicin and tobramicin + ciprofloxacin for prevention of transrectal prostatic biopsy infectious complications. We revised our complications, microorganism most common in the infectious complications, and their sensibility. Material and methods: Prospective and randomized study in 153 patients with 157 prostatic biopsies. The 71 patients in group A were treated with intramuscular tobramicin 100 mg, one dose 30 minutes before biopsy and another one 8 hours afterwards. The 85 patients in group B were treated with the same tobramicin doses and oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg, one dose 30 minutes before biopsy and afterwards they continue with the ciprofloxacin every 12 hours during 3 days. Results: we did 71 biopsies in group A and 86 in group B. 50 (31,8%) patients had hematuria, 20 (12,7%) fever, 15 (9,5%) hemospermia, 7 (4,4%) perineal pain, one (1,2%) orchiepididymitis and another one (1,2%) urinary retention. The patients who had fever were 15 of the group A and 5 of the group B (p=0,004). A total of 15 (21,1%) patients with fever of the group A needed to be treated in the hospital and 3 patients (3,5%) of the group B (p=0,0006). E. coli growthed in 67% of the blood cultures and amoxicillin-clavulanic, tobramicin and third generation of cephalosporins were the antibiotics more eficacious. Conclusions: Prophylaxis scheme with tobramicin plus ciprofloxacin was more efficacy that tobramicina alone in transrectal prostatic biopsy. Hematuria was the most common complication. E.coli was the microorganism most frequent in infectious complications after prostatic biopsy and amoxicillin-clavulanic, tobramicin and third generation of cephalosporins the most effective antibiotics in our hospital