Epirubicin dose and sequential hormonal therapy-Mature results of the HMFEC randomised phase III trial in premenopausal patients with node positive early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The hormonal manipulation 5-Fluoro-uracil Epirubicin Cyclophosphamide (HMFEC) trial was developed at a time of uncertainty around the dose intensity of chemotherapy given to premenopausal patients with node positive breast cancer and to the benefits of tailored endocrine therapy in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HMFEC was a multi-centre, phase III, open label, randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Eligible patients were premenopausal with node positive early breast cancer; significant cardiac disease or uncontrolled hypertension was exclusion criterion. Patients were allocated to receive either eight cycles of FE50C or FE75C (given 3 weekly) with or without hormone manipulation (HM; tamoxifen or luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists according to residual hormone levels at the end of chemotherapy) irrespective of ER status. The primary end-point was disease free survival (DFS). Principal analyses were by intention to treat (ITT); however, to reflect contemporary practice, subgroup analyses according to ER status were also conducted. The mature follow-up now available from this modest sized trial enables presentation of definitive results. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2000 a total of 785 patients were randomised into the HMFEC trial (203 FE50C-HM, 191 FE50C+HM, 198 FE75C-HM, 193 FE75C+HM). At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 245 DFS events have been reported (92 ER-, 153 ER+/unknown). The effects on DFS were not statistically significantly different according to epirubicin dose (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.06; p = 0.13 FE75C versus FE50C); however, FE75C appeared to induce more alopecia and neutropenia. No statistically significant evidence was observed to support an improvement in DFS in patients allocated HM either overall (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.68-1.13; p = 0.32) or in patients with ER+/unknown disease (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.62-1.17; p = 0.32) although effect sizes are consistent with worthwhile clinical effects. Overall, there was no evidence of a difference in survival between any of the four treatment groups of the trial. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of epirubicin cause more adverse events in the absence of clear improvement in overall survival. Endocrine therapy with either tamoxifen or goserelin provided no significant added benefit to cytotoxic chemotherapy in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN98335268.

All-oral combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: an International Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, international phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a first-line combination of oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients with measurable, HER2-negative disease received, as a first line in metastatic setting, 3-weekly cycles of oral vinorelbine 80 mg m(-2) (after a first cycle at 60) on day 1 and day 8, plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (750 if >or=65 years of age) twice daily, on days 1-14. Treatment was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were enrolled and 54 were treated (median age: 58.5 years). Most (78%) had visceral involvement and 63% had received earlier (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The objective response rate (RECIST) in 49 evaluable patients was 51% (95% confidence interval (CI), 36-66), including complete response in 4%. The clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease for >or=6 months) was 63% (95% CI, 48-77). The median duration of response was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-10.2). After a median follow-up of 41 months, median progression-free survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.7) and median overall survival was 29.2 months (95% CI, 18.2-40.1). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable, the main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropaenia (49%); two patients experienced febrile neutropaenia and three patients had a neutropaenic infection (including one septic death). A particularly low rate of alopaecia was observed. CONCLUSION: These results show that the all-oral combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated first-line regimen for MBC.

Concomitant intensive chemoradiotherapy induction in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: long-term follow-up.

The aim of this study was to evaluate with a long follow-up the efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and to evaluate the breast conservation rate. Between 1990 and 2000, 66 non-metastatic patients with IBC were treated with chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation. The induction chemotherapy consisted of epirubicine, cyclophosphamide and vindesine, in association with split-course bi-fractionated irradiation to a total dose of 65 Gy with concomitant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Maintenance chemotherapy consisted of high-dose methotrexate and six cycles of epirubicine, cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil. Hormonal treatment was given if indicated. Mastectomy was not systemic. Among 65 evaluable patients, 57 (87.6%) achieved a complete clinical response and had a breast conservation. Only six loco regional relapses were noted in six patients with a delay of 20 months and with concomitant metastatic dissemination in four cases. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 28 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 63 months and median follow-up was 55.5 months. Induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation is feasible in patients with IBC, permitting a breast conservation with a high rate of local control with an OS comparable to that of the best recent series.

Phase II trial of chronomodulated infusion of high-dose fluorouracil and l-folinic acid in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To study tolerability and efficacy of an intensified chronomodulated schedule of fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-folinic acid (l-FA) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 5-FU was given near individually determined dose-limiting toxicity in a multicenter phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients (68 men and 32 women, median age 62 years, World Health Organization performance status less-than-or-equal 2) with previously untreated and inoperable metastases received chronomodulated daily infusion of 5-FU/l-FA (from 10:00 PM to 10:00 AM with peak at 4:00 AM). 5-FU dose was escalated from 900 to 1,100 mg/m(2)/d with fixed dose of l-FA at 150 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days every 14 days. RESULTS: 5-FU dose escalation was achieved in 66% of the patients. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities mainly consisted of nausea or vomiting (14% of patients and 1.5% of courses), hand-foot syndrome (38% of patients and 8% of courses), mucositis (26% of patients and 4% of courses), and diarrhea (21% of patients and 2.3% of courses). Objective response rate (ORR) was 41% (95% confidence interval, 31.5% to 50.5%). Twenty patients underwent metastases surgery; among these, 12 had a complete resection. Median progression-free survival was 7 months. Median survival was 17 months; 28% of the patients were alive at 2 years and 18.6% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: The ORR achieved with intensified chronomodulated delivery of 5-FU/l-FA was nearly twice as high as that earlier obtained by our cooperative group using less intensive 5-FU/FA chronotherapy.

Chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation in inflammatory breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Between January 1990 and December 1998, forty-eight non-metastatic patients with clinical or occult IBC were treated with chemotherapy and irradiation. The induction chemotherapy consisted of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and vindesin, in association with split-course bi-fractionated irradiation to a total dose of 65 Gy with concomitant cisplatin and fluorouracil. Maintenance chemotherapy consisted of high-dose methotrexate and 6 cycles of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil Hormonal treatment was given routinely but mastectomies were not routinely performed. A high rate of locoregional control was obtained in 47 evaluable patients of whom 93.6 % achieved a complete clinical response. Three patients had locoregional relapses, always with concomitant metastatic dissemination. In 47 patients, 21 developed metastatic dissemination with a median delay of 23 months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 45 months. Median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached after a median follow-up of 44.5 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 53 % and the 3-year OS rate was 71 %. Toxicity was mainly hematological. During the induction therapy, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 54 % of patients, grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 23 % and grade 3 or 4 anemia in 8 %. The administration of induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation is feasible in patients with IBC. The hematological toxicity of this treatment approach is significant but nevertheless, the treatment achieves a high degree of locoregional control and improved survivaL

Randomized adjuvant study comparing two schemes of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage B2 and C colon adenocarcinoma: study design and preliminary safety results. Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche Clinique en Oncologie Radiotherapies.

The aim of this randomized open-label study was to compare a bimonthly with a monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin for the adjuvant treatment of colon and high-rectum adenocarcinoma. The bimonthly regimen was administered for 2 consecutive days every 14 days as d,L-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 or L-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a 600 mg/m2 5-FU 22-hour continuous infusion (LVSFU2). In the monthly regimen, d,L-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 or L-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 15-minute infusion followed by a 400 mg/m2 15 minute 5-FU bolus was administered for 5 consecutive days every 28 days (FUFOL). Nine hundred five patients with recently resected stage B2 or C colon or high-rectum adenocarcinoma (inferior pole of the tumor subperitoneal) were recruited into the study. Patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive either LV5FU2 or FUFOL for 24 or 36 weeks. Characteristics of the patients in the two different treatment groups were similar at baseline. Compliance was good. Mean 5-FU dose intensities were 930 mg/ m2/wk and 463 mg/m2/wk for LVSFU2 and FUFOL, respectively. The incidence of maximal grade III-IV toxicities for LVSFU2 and FUFOL was neutropenia 6% and 16% (P < .001), diarrhea 4% and 10% (P < .001), and mucositis 2% and 7% (P < .001), respectively. Maximum grade III-IV toxicities in the LV5FU2 treatment group were significantly lower than in the FUFOL group (10% v 26%; P < .001). Although patients in the LV5FU2 group received twice the dose of 5-FU compared with those in the FUFOL group, LV5FU2 was shown to be less toxic. Efficacy data will be available in 2001.

Treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix with concomitant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and split course hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

To improve local and systemic control of bulky (>4 cm) and/or advanced primary cancer of the uterine cervix, 35 patients were treated with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and split course hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Radiation was administered to the pelvis in five-day courses at a dose of 1.5 Gy twice daily every 21 days until a median dose of 45 Gy was reached. 15 Gy more were administered to involved parametrium or central tumor by external radiotherapy or brachytherapy. The irradiated zone was extended to include paraaortic lymph nodes if necessary. CDDP was administered at a dose of 20 mg m(-2) and 5 FU at a dose of 500 mg m(-2) from day one to day five of each course. The median number of combined treatment courses per patient was four (1-6). Local responses were obtained in 19 out of 24 patients in whom evaluation was feasible (i.e. who did not undergo surgery prior to combined therapy). Median survival was not attained with a median follow up of 33 months, three year overall survival was 62% and 52% in patients with local control and in the whole population respectively. Several patients with stage III and IV tumors achieved a very long survival. Acute toxicity was manageable but three patients required surgical repair of late radiation complications. This combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulted in good local control and did not rule out surgery.