A whole organism small molecule screen identifies novel regulators of pancreatic endocrine development.

An early step in pancreas development is marked by the expression of the transcription factor Pdx1 within the pancreatic endoderm, where it is required for the specification of all endocrine cell types. Subsequently, Pdx1 expression becomes restricted to the ß-cell lineage, where it plays a central role in ß-cell function. This pivotal role of Pdx1 at various stages of pancreas development makes it an attractive target to enhance pancreatic ß-cell differentiation and increase ß-cell function. In this study, we used a newly generated zebrafish reporter to screen over 8000 small molecules for modulators of pdx1 expression. We found four hit compounds and validated their efficacy at different stages of pancreas development. Notably, valproic acid treatment increased pancreatic endoderm formation, while inhibition of TGFß signaling led to α-cell to ß-cell transdifferentiation. HC toxin, another HDAC inhibitor, enhances ß-cell function in primary mouse and human islets. Thus, using a whole organism screening strategy, this study identified new pdx1 expression modulators that can be used to influence different steps in pancreas and ß-cell development.

Castor oil induces laxation and uterus contraction via ricinoleic acid activating prostaglandin EP3 receptors.

Castor oil is one of the oldest drugs. When given orally, it has a laxative effect and induces labor in pregnant females. The effects of castor oil are mediated by ricinoleic acid, a hydroxylated fatty acid released from castor oil by intestinal lipases. Despite the wide-spread use of castor oil in conventional and folk medicine, the molecular mechanism by which ricinoleic acid acts remains unknown. Here we show that the EP(3) prostanoid receptor is specifically activated by ricinoleic acid and that it mediates the pharmacological effects of castor oil. In mice lacking EP(3) receptors, the laxative effect and the uterus contraction induced via ricinoleic acid are absent. Although a conditional deletion of the EP(3) receptor gene in intestinal epithelial cells did not affect castor oil-induced diarrhea, mice lacking EP(3) receptors only in smooth-muscle cells were unresponsive to this drug. Thus, the castor oil metabolite ricinoleic acid activates intestinal and uterine smooth-muscle cells via EP(3) prostanoid receptors. These findings identify the cellular and molecular mechanism underlying the pharmacological effects of castor oil and indicate a role of the EP(3) receptor as a target to induce laxative effects.

Comparative analysis of functional assays for characterization of agonist ligands at G protein-coupled receptors.

A variety of functional assays are available for agonist or antagonist screening of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but it is a priori not predictable which assay is the most suitable to identify agonists or antagonists of GPCRs with therapeutic value in humans. More specifically, it is not known how a given set of GPCR agonists compares in different functional assays with respect to potency and efficacy and whether the level of the signaling cascade that is analyzed has any impact on the detection of agonistic responses. To address this question, the authors used the recently cloned human S1P(5) receptor as a model and compared a set of 3 lipid ligands (sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P], dihydro sphingosine 1-phosphate [dhS1P], and sphingosine) in 5 different functional assays: GTPgammaS binding, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, mobilization of intracellular Ca(2+) via the FLIPR and aequorin technology, and MAP kinase (ERK1/2) activation. S1P induced agonistic responses in all except the ERK1/2 assays with EC(50) values varying by a factor of 10. Whereas dhS1P was identified as a partial agonist in the GTPgammaS assay, it behaved as a full agonist in all other settings. Sphingosine displayed partial agonistic activity exclusively in GTPgammaS binding assays. The findings suggest that assays in a given cellular background may vary significantly with respect to suitability for agonist finding and that ligands producing a response may not readily be detectable in all agonist assays.