Development of Alzheimer disease in old major depressive patients based upon their health status: A retrospective study in Taiwan.

This study is conducted to investigate the association between major depressive disorder and the subsequent development of Alzheimer disease (AD) in elderly patients with different health statuses using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).A retrospective cohort study was performed on subjects over 65 years old from 2002 to 2006 using a random sampling from the 1 million beneficiaries enrolled in the NHI. Patients who were diagnosed with major depressive disorder were selected as the case group. Subjects in the control group were selected from elderly patients who did not have depression during the study period by matching age, sex, and index date of depression with subjects in the case group using a ratio of 1:4 (case:control). Both groups of patients were checked annually over a period of 7 years to observe whether they subsequently developed AD.A total of 1776 subjects were included in the case group while 7104 subjects were in the control group. After the follow-up period, 59 patients (3.3%) with depression developed AD while 96 patients (1.4%) without depression developed AD. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the incidence rate of AD in both groups varied significantly depending on different health statuses (log-rank P < .001). Results of the generalized estimating equation model found that patients with depression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.898; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.451-2.438), very severe health status (HR = 1.630; 95% CI = 1.220-2.177), or artery diseases (HR = 1.692; 95% CI = 1.108-2.584) were at a higher risk of developing AD than other groups.The association between major depressive disorder and the later development of AD varied depending on the health statuses of elderly patients. Clinicians should exercise caution when diagnosing and treating underlying diseases in elderly depressed patients, and then attempt to improve their health status to reduce the incidence rate of subsequent AD development.

Do Hospital and Physician Volume Thresholds for the Volume-Outcome Relationship in Heart Failure Exist?

BACKGROUND: Although volume-outcome relationships have been explored for various procedures and interventions, limited information is available concerning the effect of hospital and physician volume on heart failure mortality. Most importantly, little is known about whether there are optimal hospital and physician volume thresholds to reduce heart failure mortality. OBJECTIVES: We used nationwide population-based data to identify the optimal hospital and physician volume thresholds to achieve optimum mortality and to examine the relative and combined effects of the volume thresholds on heart failure mortality. METHODS: We analyzed all 20,178 heart failure patients admitted in 2012 through Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Restricted cubic splines and multilevel logistic regression were used to identify whether there are optimal hospital and physician volume thresholds and to assess the relative and combined relationships of the volume thresholds to 30-day mortality, adjusted for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Hospital and physician volume thresholds of 40 cases and 15 cases a year, respectively, were identified, under which there was an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients treated by physicians with previous annual volumes <15 cases had higher 30-day mortality compared with those with previous annual volumes ≥15 cases, and the relationship was stronger in hospitals with previous annual volumes <40 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify both the hospital and physician volume thresholds that lead to decreases in heart failure mortality. Identifying the hospital and physician volume thresholds could be applied to quality improvement and physician training.

Impact of universal health coverage on urban-rural inequity in psychiatric service utilisation for patients with first admission for psychosis: a 10-year nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the disparities in psychiatric service utilisation over a 10-year period for patients with first admission for psychosis in relation to urban-rural residence following the implementation of universal health coverage in Taiwan. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, which has a population coverage rate of over 99% and contains all medical claim records of a nationwide cohort of patients with at least one psychiatric admission between 1996 and 2007. PARTICIPANTS: 69,690 patients aged 15-59 years with first admission between 1998 and 2007 for any psychotic disorder. MAIN EXPOSURE MEASURE: Patients' urban-rural residence at first admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute and relative inequality indexes of the following quality indicators after discharge from the first admission: all-cause psychiatric readmission at 2 and 4 years, dropout of psychiatric outpatient service at 30 days, and emergency department (ED) treat-and-release encounter at 30 days. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2007, the 4-year readmission rate decreased from 65% to 58%, the 30-day dropout rate decreased from 18% to 15%, and the 30-day ED encounter rate increased from 8% to 10%. Risk of readmission has significantly decreased in rural and urban patients, but at a slower speed for the rural patients (p=0.026). The adjusted HR of readmission in rural versus urban patients has increased from 1.00 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.04) in 1998-2000 to 1.08 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.12) in 2005-2007, indicating a mild widening of the urban-rural gap. Urban-rural differences in 30-day dropout and ED encounter rates have been stationary over time. CONCLUSIONS: The universal health coverage in Taiwan did not narrow urban-rural inequity of psychiatric service utilisation in patients with psychosis. Therefore, other policy interventions on resource allocation, service delivery and quality of care are needed to improve the outcome of rural-dwelling patients with psychosis.

The relationships among physician and hospital volume, processes, and outcomes of care for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: A volume-outcome relationship has been found for acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, the mechanisms underlying the relationship remain unclear. In particular, it is not known whether processes of care are mediators of the volume-outcome relationship, that is, whether the mechanisms underlying the relationship are through processes of care. OBJECTIVE: We used nationwide population-based data to examine the mediating effects of processes of care on the relationships of physician and hospital volume with AMI mortality. METHODS: We analyzed all 6838 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients admitted in 2008, treated by 740 physicians in 142 hospitals through Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Multilevel meditational models were performed after adjustment for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics to test the relationships among physician and hospital volume, processes of care, and 30-day STEMI mortality. RESULTS: Physicians with higher volume had higher use of percutaneous coronary intervention and aspirin, and lower mortality in the following year, and the processes of care were mediators of the relationship between physician volume and mortality. Low-volume hospitals had higher mortality in the following year than medium-volume hospitals. In stratified analyses the relationships only existed in nonlarge hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians with high volume perform better on certain processes of care than those with medium and low volume, and have better outcomes for patients with AMI. The processes of care could partly explain the relationship between physician volume and AMI mortality. However, the relationships existed in nonlarge hospitals but not in large hospitals.