CYP11A1 expression in bone is associated with aromatase inhibitor-related bone loss.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) used as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cause diverse musculoskeletal side effects that include bone loss and its associated fracture. About half of the 391 patients treated with AIs in the Barcelona-Aromatase induced bone loss in early breast cancer cohort suffered a significant bone loss at lumbar spine (LS) and/or femoral neck (FN) after 2 years on AI-treatment. In contrast, up to one-third (19.6% LS, 38.6% FN) showed no decline or even increased bone density. The present study aimed to determine the genetic basis for this variability. SNPs in candidate genes involved in vitamin D and estrogen hormone-response pathways (CYP11A1, CYP17A1, HSD3B2, HSD17B3, CYP19A1, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, ESR1, DHCR7, GC, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, VDR and CYP24A1) were genotyped for association analysis with AI-related bone loss (AIBL). After multiple testing correction, 3 tag-SNPs (rs4077581, s11632698 and rs900798) located in the CYP11A1 gene were significantly associated (P<0.005) with FN AIBL at 2 years of treatment. Next, CYP11A1 expression in human fresh bone tissue and primary osteoblasts was demonstrated by RT-PCR. Both common isoforms of human cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (encoded by CYP11A1 gene) were detected in osteoblasts by western blot. In conclusion, the genetic association of CYP11A1 gene with AIBL and its expression in bone tissue reveals a potential local function of this enzyme in bone metabolism regulation, offering a new vision of the steroidogenic ability of this tissue and new understanding of AI-induced bone loss.

Sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and high dose leucovorin versus 5-FU and high dose leucovorin versus 5-FU alone for advanced colorectal cancer. A multi-institutional randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to compare the single-biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin with that of the double-biochemical modulation of methotrexate and leucovorin. Because of the Martin et al. study in which an experimental model showed similar effects of 5-FU at maximum tolerated doses to the modulation with leucovorin at standard doses, a third treatment arm of 5-FU alone was also studied. METHODS: A randomized trial was performed using a 500-mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) 1-hour infusion of methotrexate, and 12 hours later, a 600-mg/m2 i.v. bolus of 5-FU plus a 200-mg/m2 i.v. 1-hour infusion of leucovorin (MFL) every 2 weeks versus 5-FU plus leucovorin at an equal dose and schedule (FL), versus a 1200-mg/m2 i.v. dose of 5-FU every 2 weeks. Of 186 patients included in the study, 178 were evaluable. RESULTS: In a preliminary analysis with 94 evaluable patients, two significant statistical differences were shown. First, the toxicity rate of the 5-FU--alone (F) treatment arm was higher than that of the other arms (MFL vs. F, P = 0.0002; FL vs. F, P = 0.00001). Second, the median survival was worse in the F treatment arm with a rate of 12.6 months for the MFL and FL arms and 7.5 months for the F arm (P < 0.05). Considering these results, the F treatment arm was discontinued. The final results included 70 evaluable patients for MFL and 74 patients for FL. No difference was found in the distribution of prognostic factors. The response rates were 25.7% for MFL (95% CI, 16-37.5) and 14.8% for FL (95% CI, 7.6-25), (P = 0.1). The median survival was 14.3 months for patients treated with MFL and 12.3 months for those treated with FL. The hematologic toxicity was mild, with no grade 3/4 leukopenia in either treatment arm. The major nonhematologic toxicity in the MFL and FL treatment arms was ocular; nongrade 3/4 diarrhea also was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of MFL double-biochemical modulation failed to show a significant statistical difference from that of single-biochemical modulation for this dose and schedule.