Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards.

In vivo genotoxicity tests play a pivotal role in genotoxicity testing batteries. They are used both to determine if potential genotoxicity observed in vitro is realised in vivo and to detect any genotoxic carcinogens that are poorly detected in vitro. It is recognised that individual in vivo genotoxicity tests have limited sensitivity but good specificity. Thus, a positive result from the established in vivo assays is taken as strong evidence for genotoxic carcinogenicity of the compound tested. However, there is a growing body of evidence that compound-related disturbances in the physiology of the rodents used in these assays can result in increases in micronucleated cells in the bone marrow that are not related to the intrinsic genotoxicity of the compound under test. For rodent bone marrow or peripheral blood micronucleus tests, these disturbances include changes in core body temperature (hypothermia and hyperthermia) and increases in erythropoiesis following prior toxicity to erythroblasts or by direct stimulation of cell division in these cells. This paper reviews relevant data from the literature and also previously unpublished data obtained from a questionnaire devised by the IWGT working group. Regulatory implications of these findings are discussed and flow diagrams have been provided to aid in interpretation and decision-making when such changes in physiology are suspected.

Determination of genetic toxicity and potential carcinogenicity in vitro--challenges post the Seventh Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive.

Genetic toxicology and its role in the detection of carcinogens is currently undergoing a period of reappraisal. There is an increasing interest in developing alternatives to animal testing and the three R's of reduction, refinement and replacement are the basis for EU and national animal protection laws the Seventh Amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive will ban the marketing of cosmetic/personal care products that contain ingredients that have been tested in animal models. Thus in vivo tests such as the bone marrow micronucleus test, which has a key role in current testing strategies for genotoxicity, will not be available for this class of products. The attrition rate for new, valuable and safe chemicals tested in an in vitro-only testing battery, using the in vitro tests currently established for genotoxicity screening, will greatly increase once this legislation is in place. In addition there has been an explosion of knowledge concerning the cellular and molecular events leading to carcinogenesis. This knowledge has not yet been fully factored into screening chemicals for properties that are not directly linked to mutation induction. Thus there is a pressing need for new, more accurate approaches to determine genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. However, a considerable challenge is presented for these new approaches to be universally accepted and new tests sufficiently validated by March 2009 when the animal testing and marketing bans associated with the Seventh Amendment are due to come into force. This commentary brings together ideas and approaches from several international workshops and meetings to consider these issues.

An assessment of the utility of the yeast GreenScreen assay in pharmaceutical screening.

In this paper we describe an initial reproducibility study of 12 proprietary compounds followed by the assessment of 51 marketed pharmaceuticals and, lastly, a summary of the data so far from 2698 proprietary compounds from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) compound library, in the yeast GreenScreen assay (GSA). In this assay, a reporter system in the yeast cells employs the DNA damage inducible promoter of the RAD54 gene, fused to the extremely stable green fluorescent protein (GFP). The assay proved to be very robust, the Excel templates provided by Gentronix with the assay interfaced well with in-house J&J systems with little adaptation, the assay was very rapid to perform and used very little compound. The results confirm previous work which suggests that the yeast GSA detects different classes of genotoxic compounds to the Ames assay and as a result can help screen out important genotoxic compounds at the pre-regulatory test phase that are missed by Ames-test-based screens alone. A combination of SAR evaluation of genotoxicity plus an Ames-test-based screen and the GSA provides a powerful pre-regulatory test battery to aid in the selection of successful drug candidates.

Ondansetron: pre-clinical safety evaluation.

A programme of pre-clinical safety evaluation of ondansetron has been undertaken which involved a series of studies - single dose studies, repeat dose studies, reproduction studies, genotoxicity studies, oncogenicity studies, local irritancy studies, and a hypersensitivity study. Ondansetron was found to have a very good safety profile, and the only toxicity identified was associated with central nervous system activity when near lethal doses were administered. It was not genotoxic and had no reproductive or oncogenic potential.