Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 32(10): 3007-16, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898066

RESUMEN

The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic MD on pain, functional capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, and depression in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). A total of 40 inpatient subjects with definite SIS were included in this study. These patients were sequentially randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 20) received therapeutic MD. Group 2 (n = 20) was served as control group and received sham MD. Superficial heat and exercise program were given to both groups. Both of the programs were performed 5 times weekly for 3 weeks. Patients were assessed before treatment (BT), after treatment (AT), and at a 1-month follow-up (F). Outcome measures included visual analogue scale, goniometry, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, shoulder isokinetic muscle testing, handgrip strength, Short Form 36, and Beck Depression Index. The patients with SIS in each group had significant improvements in pain, shoulder ROM, disability, shoulder muscles and grip strength, quality of life, and depression AT and F when compared with their initial status (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to all the parameters regarding the change scores between AT-BT test and F-BT test (P > 0.05). A 2,450-MHz MD regimen showed no beneficial effects in patients with SIS, so the superficial heat and exercise program, as it is efficient, may be preferable for the treatment of SIS, alone.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/etiología , Diatermia/métodos , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Fuerza Muscular , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/terapia , Articulación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Dolor de Hombro/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Artrometría Articular , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Terapia Combinada , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recuperación de la Función , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/psicología , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/fisiopatología , Dolor de Hombro/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía , Adulto Joven
2.
Phys Ther ; 84(4): 336-43, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15049727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is still a lack of evidence about the beneficial effects of ultrasound (US) intervention for the management of soft tissue problems. Thus, this study was designed to assess the effectiveness of US over a placebo intervention when added to other physical therapy interventions and exercise in the management of shoulder disorders. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty patients who were diagnosed by ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging to have a periarticular soft tissue disorder of the shoulder were randomly assigned to either a group that received true US (n=20; mean time since onset of pain=8.7 months, SD=8.8, range=1-36) or a group that received sham US (n=20; mean time since onset of pain=8.1 months, SD=10.8, range=1-42). Besides true or sham US (10 minutes), superficial heat (10 minutes), electrical stimulation (15 minutes), and an exercise program (15-30 minutes) were administered to both groups 5 days each week for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Subjects showed within-group improvements in pain, range of motion, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire scores, and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores with the intervention, but the differences did not reach significance when compared between the groups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results suggest that true US, compared with sham US, brings no further benefit when applied in addition to other physical therapy interventions in the management of soft tissue disorders of the shoulder.


Asunto(s)
Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Dolor de Hombro/terapia , Hombro , Terapia por Ultrasonido , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA