RESUMEN
Acute ischemic stroke affects men and women differently. In particular, women are often reported to experience higher acute stroke severity than men. We derived a low-dimensional representation of anatomical stroke lesions and designed a Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework tailored to estimate possible sex differences in lesion patterns linked to acute stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale). This framework was developed in 555 patients (38% female). Findings were validated in an independent cohort (n = 503, 41% female). Here, we show brain lesions in regions subserving motor and language functions help explain stroke severity in both men and women, however more widespread lesion patterns are relevant in female patients. Higher stroke severity in women, but not men, is associated with left hemisphere lesions in the vicinity of the posterior circulation. Our results suggest there are sex-specific functional cerebral asymmetries that may be important for future investigations of sex-stratified approaches to management of acute ischemic stroke.
Asunto(s)
Tronco Encefálico/patología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/patología , Corteza Sensoriomotora/patología , Tálamo/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Teorema de Bayes , Mapeo Encefálico , Tronco Encefálico/irrigación sanguínea , Tronco Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagen , Revascularización Cerebral/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Corteza Sensoriomotora/irrigación sanguínea , Corteza Sensoriomotora/diagnóstico por imagen , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Tálamo/irrigación sanguínea , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Design thinking is an innovative, human-centered approach to problem-solving. In design thinking, teams step away from immediate and reactionary approaches to complex problems in favor of novel, broader approaches. The key tenets of empathy and user-centered insights are emphasized. The primary objective in this holistic approach is to keep the needs, desires, and behaviors of all stakeholders involved in the ecosystem at the center of the design process. This approach creates more extensive, more diverse, and more productive teams in which each member is invested in the changes being designed and proposed. This review highlights the methodology, outcome metrics, advantages, and challenges of human-centered design in health care and radiology.