Prospective switch study comparing two irrigation systems for transanal irrigation in children.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Transanal irrigation (TAI) is used in children to treat constipation and incontinence. Belgium has 2 systems available: Colotip® (cheaper, however not designed for TAI) or Peristeen®. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This patient-control switch study is the first to compare 2 TAI systems. Children regularly using Colotip® for TAI were asked to participate, after consent, a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating the system and a 2-week diary (fecal continence, self-reliance, time spent on the toilet, pain, Bristol stool scale, irrigation volume and frequency of enema) were completed. Non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS: Out of 26 children using Colotip®, 18 (69%) children participated and 5 refused (fear n=1, satisfaction Colotip® system n=7). Of these 18 children (interquartile range: 3-18 years, median 12.5 years, 9 girls) 5 patients stopped Peristeen® (pain n=1, fear n=1 and balloon loss n=3) and 2 were lost from follow up. Dropouts and included patients showed no statistical difference. In the 11 remaining patients, pseudo-continence (p 0.015), independence (p 0.01) and VAS score (p 0.007) were significantly better with Peristeen®, no difference was found in time spent on the toilet (p 0.288) and presence of pain (p 0.785). CONCLUSIONS: In children Peristeen® offered significantly higher pseudo-continence and independency. 30% refused participation because of satisfaction with the Colotip® and 30% spina bifida patients reported rectal balloon loss due to sphincter hypotony. To diminish Peristeen® failure, a test-catheter could be of value. Considering Colotip® satisfaction, both systems should be available. Patient selection for Peristeen® needs further research.

Intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IBT) for locally unresectable intraabdominal malignancy.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IBT) has been successfully used in locally advanced unresectable intraabdominal malignancy. We retrospectively evaluated the safety, feasibility, and general outcome of IBT following cytoreductive surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After radical resection, the target area to be treated by IBT was determined jointly by the surgeon and the radiation oncologist. A silicon template was used to position parallel hollow catheters spaced 1 cm apart against the area of interest. IBT doses were prescribed at 1 cm depth from the template surface and calculated using standard plans. Radiation was administered in a dedicated shielded room. RESULTS: Between August 2001 and February 2006, 10 patients (colorectal cancer n = 6, cervix cancer n = 1, extramedullar plasmocytoma n = 1, liposarcoma n = 1 and sacrococcygeal teratocarcinoma n = 1) were treated. The mean delivered IBT dose was 8 Gy (range 7.5-20). No postoperative mortality was seen, while major complications developed in one (10%) patient with a rectovaginal fistula and intraabdominal abscess. Five of the six colorectal cancer patients developed local recurrence while 3 also developed distant metastases. The mean disease-free and overall survival in this group was 8.5 months (range 4-15) and 25.5 months (range 10-48) respectively. Palliation of symptoms was observed in 89 % of cases. CONCLUSION: IBT combined with debulking surgery is feasible and can be safely performed. While cure is rarely achieved, IBT offers the potential to prolong local control and survival in locally unresectable intraabdominal cancer. Therefore, IBT can be considered as a valuable adjuvant in the therapeutic and palliative armamentarium in these selected patients.