Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.

Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with in vitro activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment on days 1 and 2 by MIC were assessed using the following four approaches for selecting PK-PD targets: (i) median, (ii) second highest, (iii) highest, and (iv) randomly assigned total-drug ELF and free-drug plasma ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with a 1-log10 CFU reduction from baseline. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on total-drug ELF AUC/MIC ratio targets on days 1 and 2 were ≥91.1% for S. pneumoniae for all approaches but the highest target and ≥99.2% for H. influenzae for all approaches at MIC90s (0.12 and 1 µg/mL for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively). Lower percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on free-drug plasma AUC/MIC ratio targets were observed for randomly assigned and the highest free-drug plasma targets for S. pneumoniae and for all targets for H. influenzae. These data provided support for approved omadacycline dosing regimens to treat patients with CABP and decisions for the interpretive criteria for the in vitro susceptibility testing of omadacycline against these pathogens.

Relationship between Gepotidacin Exposure and Prevention of On-Therapy Resistance Amplification in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae Hollow-Fiber In Vitro Infection Model.

Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has emerged as a threat to global health. The relationship between gepotidacin exposure and prevention of on-therapy amplification of drug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae was examined using a 7-day hollow-fiber in vitro infection model. The study design included both inactive (no-treatment and ciprofloxacin) and active (ceftriaxone) control regimens. Study drug concentration-time profiles were simulated in the in vitro system for a single oral 0.5 g ciprofloxacin dose, a single intramuscular 0.25 g ceftriaxone dose, and single or two (8 to 12 h apart) oral gepotidacin doses ranging from 0.75 to 12 g. The initial bacterial burden inoculated in the model was 106 CFU/ml. The gepotidacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftriaxone broth MIC values for the challenge isolate (N. gonorrhoeae GSK #8) were 0.5, 2, and 0.002 mg/liter, respectively. Samples were collected for enumeration of total and drug-resistant bacterial populations and drug concentrations. The no-treatment control reached a bacterial density greater than 108 CFU/ml over 24 h and remained consistent over the 7-day study period. The bacterial density in the model system of the ciprofloxacin regimen matched that of the growth control throughout the study duration, while the ceftriaxone regimen sterilized the model system by the end of day 1. For gepotidacin, a full dose-response relationship was observed. While failure was observed for the 0.75-, 1.5-, and 3-g single-dose regimens, all gepotidacin single- or divided-dose regimens totaling at least 4.5 g prevented resistance amplification and sterilized the model system. These data are useful to provide gepotidacin dose selection support for treating patients with gonorrhea infections.

Norepinephrine in Combination with Antibiotic Therapy Increases both the Bacterial Replication Rate and Bactericidal Activity.

We previously demonstrated that the rate and extent of an antimicrobial agent's bactericidal effects were coupled to the bacterial replication rate, the latter of which was modulated with the sodium chloride concentration. Herein, we describe the results from a 24-h one-compartment in vitro infection model study that was designed to demonstrate that an antimicrobial agent's bactericidal effects could be amplified when it is administered with a pharmaceutical agent that increases the bacterial replication rate. The antimicrobial and growth-promoting agents selected were levofloxacin and norepinephrine, respectively. The challenge isolate was Escherichia coli JMI 21711R (levofloxacin MIC, 8 mg/liter). Within the in vitro infection model, a human levofloxacin concentration-time profile (half-life, 7 h) was simulated and the challenge isolate was subjected to an ineffective monotherapy exposure (free-drug area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h divided by the MIC [AUC/MIC] ratio of 6) with and without norepinephrine as a continuous infusion (275 mg/liter). Samples were collected from the model during the course of the study for bacterial density determinations and drug concentration assay using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). As expected, the norepinephrine and no-treatment control arms failed immediately, followed by the levofloxacin monotherapy arm, which failed slowly over time. The levofloxacin-epinephrine regimen resulted in a 2-log10 CFU reduction in bacterial density over the first 6 to 8 h of the study, which was followed by regrowth of a highly levofloxacin-resistant subpopulation (MIC, 64 mg/liter). These data demonstrate that increasing the rate of bacterial replication with a pharmaceutical product in combination with antimicrobial therapy represents an opportunity to increase the rate and magnitude of bactericidal effect.

Impact of spores on the comparative efficacies of five antibiotics for treatment of Bacillus anthracis in an in vitro hollow fiber pharmacodynamic model.

Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax, is an agent of bioterrorism. The most effective antimicrobial therapy for B. anthracis infections is unknown. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model of B. anthracis was used to compare the efficacies of simulated clinically prescribed regimens of moxifloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem with the "gold standards," doxycycline and ciprofloxacin. Treatment outcomes for isogenic spore-forming and non-spore-forming strains of B. anthracis were compared. Against spore-forming B. anthracis, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem reduced the B. anthracis population by 4 log(10) CFU/ml over 10 days. Doxycycline reduced the population of this B. anthracis strain by 5 log(10) CFU/ml (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P = 0.01 versus other drugs). Against an isogenic non-spore-forming strain, meropenem killed the vegetative B. anthracis the fastest, followed by moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin and then doxycycline. Linezolid offered the lowest bacterial kill rate. Heat shock studies using the spore-producing B. anthracis strain showed that with moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and meropenem therapies the total population was mostly spores, while the population was primarily vegetative bacteria with linezolid and doxycycline therapies. Spores have a profound impact on the rate and extent of killing of B. anthracis. Against spore-forming B. anthracis, the five antibiotics killed the total (spore and vegetative) bacterial population at similar rates (within 1 log(10) CFU/ml of each other). However, bactericidal antibiotics killed vegetative B. anthracis faster than bacteriostatic drugs. Since only vegetative-phase B. anthracis produces the toxins that may kill the infected host, the rate and mechanism of killing of an antibiotic may determine its overall in vivo efficacy. Further studies are needed to examine this important observation.

Dose range evaluation of Mycograb C28Y variant, a human recombinant antibody fragment to heat shock protein 90, in combination with amphotericin B-desoxycholate for treatment of murine systemic candidiasis.

Systemic candidiasis causes significant mortality in patients despite amphotericin B (AMB) therapy. Mycograb C28Y variant, a human recombinant antibody fragment to heat shock protein 90, is closely related to Mycograb, which showed a survival advantage in combination with AMB in a phase III human trial. The Mycograb C28Y variant could potentially increase the antifungal effect of AMB. In our study, the interaction between AMB-desoxycholate (DAMB) and the Mycograb C28Y variant was characterized in vitro by using a checkerboard method. Quantitative cultures of kidneys, livers, and spleens of neutropenic mice with systemic Candida albicans infections were used to assess the in vivo interaction between 1.4 mg/kg of body weight/day of DAMB and 0.15, 1.5, and 15 mg/kg/day of the Mycograb C28Y variant after 1, 3, and 5 days of therapy. DAMB and Mycograb C28Y variant monotherapies, vehicle, and a no-treatment arm served as controls. Also, single- and multidose pharmacokinetics for the Mycograb C28Y variant were determined. Indifference or synergy between DAMB and the Mycograb C28Y variant was seen in two trials by the checkerboard method. The pharmacokinetics of the Mycograb C28Y variant was best described by a 2-compartment model with a median serum t(1/2)(α) of ~0.198 h and a t(1/2)(ß) of ~1.77 h. In mice, DAMB together with the Mycograb C28Y variant was no more effective than AMB alone (P > 0.05 by analysis of variance). The Mycograb C28Y variant alone had no antifungal activity. We therefore conclude that the Mycograb C28Y variant in combination with DAMB offered no benefit over DAMB monotherapy in a neutropenic murine model of systemic candidiasis.