Magnetic resonance enema vs rectal water-contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance enema (MR-e) and rectal water-contrast transvaginal sonography (RWC-TVS) in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. METHODS: This prospective study included 286 patients of reproductive age with clinical suspicion of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Patients underwent MR-e and RWC-TVS before laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions. The findings of MR-e and RWC-TVS were compared with surgical and histological results. RESULTS: Of the 286 patients included in the study, 151 (52.8%) had rectosigmoid endometriosis. MR-e and RWC-TVS had similar accuracy in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis (P = 0.063). In the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis with MR-e, the sensitivity was 95.4% (95% CI, 90.7-99.1%), specificity was 97.8% (95% CI, 93.6-99.5%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 98.0% (95% CI, 94.1-99.6%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.0% (95% CI, 89.9-97.9%), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 42.91 (95% CI, 14.01-131.46) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.10). For diagnosis with RWC-TVS, sensitivity was 92.7% (95% CI, 87.3-96.3%), specificity was 97.0% (95% CI, 92.6-99.2%), PPV was 97.2% (95% CI, 93.0-99.2%), NPV was 92.3% (95% CI, 86.6-96.1%), LR+ was 31.29 (95% CI, 11.90-82.25) and LR- was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.13). MR-e and RWC-TVS underestimated the size of the endometriotic nodules; for both imaging techniques the underestimation was greater for nodules with a diameter ≥ 30 mm. There was no significant difference in the mean intensity of pain experienced by the patients during the two examinations. CONCLUSIONS: RWC-TVS should be the first-line investigation in patients with clinical suspicion of rectosigmoid endometriosis and physicians should be trained in performing this examination. Considering that MR-e is more expensive than RWC-TVS, it should be used only when the findings of RWC-TVS are unclear. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of preterm delivery.

Preterm delivery (PD) is characterized both by increased neonatal morbidity and mortality and by important late pathologic sequelae. From a clinical stand-point, PD may results from a medical condition where the continuation of pregnancy could bring about a marked risk for the foetus and/or for the mother, or from an adverse event where the pregnancy is going to end spontaneously before 37 weeks of gestation. In the past few years some epidemiological studies have shown that diet may interfere with complex multifactorial processes contributing to the preterm triggering of labour. The attention has been focused on polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) such as alpha-linoleic acid, precursor of Omega-3 series, and linoleic acid, precursor Omega-6 series. Their importance in modulating Prostaglandin concentrations at different levels is already known. Moreover, it has been reported that in clinical situation, such as PD, the endogenous levels of PUFA are unbalanced, with a Omega-6 predominance. Experimental, observational and clinical studies suggest that dietary intake of Omega-3 fatty acids is capable of significantly prolonging the duration of gestation in the range of 4-7 days; such prolongation would possibly occur through the inhibition of prostaglandins E2 and F2 alpha. In Western population dietary intake of Omega-3 appears to be marginal, and recommended assumption could be reached only by a ten-fold increase in blue fish ingestion. The recommended intake of EPA + DHA should be 1.4 g/daily with a 1:2.5 EPA:DHA. It is therefore possible to conclude that in light of controlled clinical studies and of the actual categories of risk for preterm delivery, the dietary supplementation of Omega-3, in addition to other pharmacological measures (17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate), could be implemented for the secondary and/or tertiary prophylaxis of preterm delivery.