Mechanistic Study on the Degradation of Hydrolysable Core-Crosslinked Polymeric Micelles.

Core-crosslinked polymeric micelles (CCPMs) are an attractive class of nanocarriers for drug delivery. Two crosslinking approaches to form CCPMs exist: either via a low-molecular-weight crosslinking agent to connect homogeneous polymer chains with reactive handles or via cross-reactive handles on polymers to link them to each other (complementary polymers). Previously, CCPMs based on methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide-lactate] (mPEG-b-PHPMAmLacn) modified with thioesters were crosslinked via native chemical ligation (NCL, a reaction between a cysteine residue and thioester resulting in an amide bond) using a bifunctional cysteine containing crosslinker. These CCPMs are degradable under physiological conditions due to hydrolysis of the ester groups present in the crosslinks. The rapid onset of degradation observed previously, as measured by the light scattering intensity, questions the effectiveness of crosslinking via a bifunctional agent. Particularly due to the possibility of intrachain crosslinks that can occur using such a small crosslinker, we investigated the degradation mechanism of CCPMs generated via both approaches using various analytical techniques. CCPMs based on complementary polymers degraded slower at pH 7.4 and 37 °C than CCPMs with a crosslinker (the half-life of the light scattering intensity was approximately 170 h versus 80 h, respectively). Through comparative analysis of the degradation profiles of the two different CCPMs, we conclude that partially ineffective intrachain crosslinks are likely formed using the small crosslinker, which contributed to more rapid CCPM degradation. Overall, this study shows that the type of crosslinking approach can significantly affect degradation kinetics, and this should be taken into consideration when developing new degradable CCPM platforms.

Fabrication of Kidney Proximal Tubule Grafts Using Biofunctionalized Electrospun Polymer Scaffolds.

The increasing prevalence of end-stage renal disease and persistent shortage of donor organs call for alternative therapies for kidney patients. Dialysis remains an inferior treatment as clearance of large and protein-bound waste products depends on active tubular secretion. Biofabricated tissues could make a valuable contribution, but kidneys are highly intricate and multifunctional organs. Depending on the therapeutic objective, suitable cell sources and scaffolds must be selected. This study provides a proof-of-concept for stand-alone kidney tubule grafts with suitable mechanical properties for future implantation purposes. Porous tubular nanofiber scaffolds are fabricated by electrospinning 12%, 16%, and 20% poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) v/w (chloroform and dimethylformamide, 1:3) around 0.7 mm needle templates. The resulting scaffolds consist of 92%, 69%, and 54% nanofibers compared to microfibers, respectively. After biofunctionalization with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and collagen IV, 10 × 106 proximal tubule cells per mL are injected and cultured until experimental readout. A human-derived cell model can bridge all fiber-to-fiber distances to form a monolayer, whereas small-sized murine cells form monolayers on dense nanofiber meshes only. Fabricated constructs remain viable for at least 3 weeks and maintain functionality as shown by inhibitor-sensitive transport activity, which suggests clearance capacity for both negatively and positively charged solutes.

Preclinical evaluation of thermosensitive poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide mono/dilactate)-grafted liposomes for cancer thermochemotherapy.

Thermosensitive liposomes grafted with cholesterol-conjugated poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide mono/dilactate) (chol-pHPMAlac) have been developed for heat-induced release of doxorubicin (DOX). These liposomes release DOX completely during mild hyperthermia, but their interaction with blood cells and cancer cells has not been studied. Following intravenous administration, liposomes may interact with plasma proteins and various types of cells (e.g., endothelial cells, platelets, and macrophages), which would reduce their disposition in the tumor stroma. Interaction between liposomes and platelets may further cause platelet activation and thrombosis, which could lead to vascular occlusion and thromboembolic complications. The aim was to investigate DOX release kinetics in the presence of serum, stability, in vitro uptake by and toxicity to cancer cells and somatic cells, and platelet activating potential of the chol-pHPMAlac liposomes. DOX release was determined spectrofluorometrically. Liposome stability was determined in buffer and serum by dynamic light scattering and nanoparticle tracking analysis. Association with/uptake by and toxicity of empty liposomes to AML-12, HepG2 (both hepatocyte-derived cancer cells), RAW 264.7 (macrophages), and HUVEC (endothelial) cells was assayed in vitro. Platelet activation was determined by analysis of P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding. DOPE:EPC liposomes (diameter = 135 nm) grafted with 5% chol-pHPMAlac (cloud point (CP) = 16 °C; Mn = 8.5 kDa) released less than 10% DOX at 37 °C in 30 min, whereas complete release took place at 47 °C or higher within 10 min. The size of these liposomes remained stable in buffer and serum during 24 h at 37 °C. Fluorescently labeled but DOX-lacking chol-pHPMAlac-liposomes exhibited poor association with/uptake by all cells under investigation, were not cytotoxic, and did not activate platelets in both buffered solution and whole blood. In conclusion, thermosensitive chol-pHPMAlac-grafted liposomes rapidly release DOX during mild hyperthermia. The liposomes are stable in a physiological milieu, are not taken up by cells that are encountered in an in vivo setting, and are non-antagonistic towards platelets. Chol-pHPMAlac-grafted liposomes are therefore good candidates for DOX delivery to tumors and temperature-triggered release in tumor stroma.

Nanogels for intracellular delivery of biotherapeutics.

Many biomolecules, such as proteins and genes, are presently used as therapeutics. However, their delivery to target sites inside cells is challenging because of their large molecular size, difficulties to pass cellular membranes and their susceptibility for enzymatic and chemical degradation. Nanogels, three-dimensional networks of hydrophilic polymers, are attractive carrier systems for these biotherapeutics because they protect the biologicals against degradation and, importantly, facilitate cell internalization. Furthermore, the development of responsive nanogel delivery systems has resulted in particles that release their payloads due to a certain physiological trigger inside cells, such as in the cytosol or endocytic compartments. This paper reviews and discusses the use of nanogels, with special emphasis on biologically responsive systems, for intracellular delivery of biotherapeutics.

Nanomedicines for advanced cancer treatments: Transitioning towards responsive systems.

The development of nanomedicines for the treatment of cancer focuses on the local targeted delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to enhance drug efficacy and reduce adverse effects. The nanomedicines which are currently approved for clinical use are mainly successful in terms of improved bioavailability and tolerability but do not necessarily increase drug performance. Therefore, there is a need for improved drug carrier systems which are able to deliver high doses of anti-cancer drugs to the tumor. Stimuli responsive carriers are promising candidates since drug release can be triggered locally in the tumor via internal (i.e. pH, redox potential, metabolite or enzyme concentration) or external (i.e. heat, ultrasound, light, magnetic field) stimuli. This review summarizes the recent progress in the transition towards stimuli responsive nanomedicines (i.e. liposomes, polymeric micelles, nanogels and mesoporous silica nanoparticles) and other therapy modalities that are currently developed in the fight against cancer like the application of ultrasound, tumor normalization and phototherapy. Furthermore, the potential role of image guided drug delivery in the development of new nanomedicines and its clinical application is discussed.