Effect and safety of listening to music or audiobooks as a coadjuvant treatment for chronic pain patients under opioid treatment: a study protocol for an open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, proof-of-concept clinical trial in a tertiary hospital in the Barcelona South Metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) treatment's primary goal is to maintain physical and mental functioning while improving quality of life. Opioid use in CNCP patients has increased in recent years, and non-pharmacological interventions such as music listening have been proposed to counter it. Unlike other auditive stimuli, music can activate emotional-regulating and reward-regulating circuits, making it a potential tool to modulate attentional processes and regulate mood. This study's primary objective is to provide the first evidence on the distinct (separate) effects of music listening as a coadjuvant maintenance analgesic treatment in CNCP patients undergoing opioid analgesia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a single-centre, phase II, open-label, parallel-group, proof-of-concept randomised clinical trial with CNCP patients under a minimum 4-week regular opioid treatment. We plan to include 70 consecutive patients, which will be randomised (1:1) to either the experimental group (active music listening) or the control group (active audiobooks listening). During 28 days, both groups will listen daily (for at least 30 min and up to 1 hour) to preset playlists tailored to individual preferences.Pain intensity scores at each visit, the changes (differences) from baseline and the proportions of responders according to various definitions based on pain intensity differences will be described and compared between study arms. We will apply longitudinal data assessment methods (mixed generalised linear models) taking the patient as a cluster to assess and compare the endpoints' evolution. We will also use the mediation analysis framework to adjust for the effects of additional therapeutic measures and obtain estimates of effect with a causal interpretation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been reviewed, and ethics approval has been obtained from the Bellvitge University Hospital Institutional Review Board, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05726266.

Effectiveness of a high fiber diet in improving constipation in patients with defecatory dyssynergy under treatment with anorrectal biofeedback. Exploratory, randomized clinical trial. / Eficacia de la dieta alta en fibra en la mejora del estreñimiento en pacientes con disinergia defecatoria en tratamiento con biofeedback anorrectal. Ensayo clínico exploratorio, aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: Fiber is the initial treatment in chronic functional constipation. However, its role in the group of patients with defecatory dyssynergy is not well established. The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a high fiber diet in patients with defecatory dyssynergy in the treatment with anorectal biofeedback. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An exploratory, randomized (1:1), double-blind, controlled «add-on¼ clinical trial was carried out in a reference center in Spain in patients with functional constipation and defecatory dyssynergy according to the ROMEIV criteria. CONTROL GROUP: treatment with biofeedback and low-fiber diet (15-20g/day). Experimental group: treatment with biofeedback and high fiber diet (25-30g/day). Analyzed: responder (primary endpoint), patient whose defecatory dyssynergy had been corrected (>20% reduction in anal pressure during the defecation maneuver and normal balloon expulsion test); anorectal parameters (anal relaxation, reduced straining); safety (abdominal symptoms: flatulence, pain, borborygmus, bloating). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were randomized: 22 per group. The percentage of responders was 75% (15/20; 95%CI: 53 89%) control group and 70% (14/20; 95%CI: 48-85%) experimental group, P=.225. Differences in favor of the control group were only observed in abdominal symptoms: flatulence (P=.028), abdominal distension (P=.041) and digestive comfort (P=.043). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with defecatory dyssynergy, a high-fiber diet not only does not improve the efficacy of anorectal biofeedback but is associated with a loss of improvement in abdominal symptoms.

Usefulness of ICG Angiography-Guided Thyroidectomy for Preserving Parathyroid Function.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoparathyroidism is the most frequent complication after total thyroidectomy and, when permanent, it becomes a severe chronic disease. We assessed the usefulness of indocyanine green (ICG) angiography-guided thyroidectomy to reduce the postoperative hypocalcemia. METHODS: Prospective study with two consecutive cohorts of patients who underwent total thyroidectomy: historical control group (CG) and angiography-guided thyroidectomy group (AG). In all patients, ICG-angiography was performed at the end of the surgery to predict immediate parathyroid gland (PG) function. In the AG, ICG-angiography was also done after PG identification to show their vascular supply. We compared the rate of postoperative hypocalcemia (calcium supplementation needed due to hypocalcemia symptoms or calcium levels < 1.8 mmol/L on the first postoperative day) and permanent hypocalcemia (need of calcium ± vitamin D supplementation 12 months after thyroidectomy). RESULTS: We included 120 consecutive patients (84 CG; 36 AG). Thyroid cancer was the most common diagnostic (63.1% CG-69.4% AG; p = 0.646) and central neck dissection was also frequent (54.8% CG-64.3% AG; p = 0.468). The AG developed a lower rate of postoperative (26.2-5.6%; p = 0.011) and permanent hypocalcemia (11.9-0%; p = 0.032). The OR for permanent hypocalcemia was 0.673 (95% CI 0.591-0.766). A significant higher rate of well vascularized PG at the end of the surgery (score 2) in the AG (39.2-52.9%; p = 0.018) was also seen. CONCLUSION: ICG angiography-guided thyroidectomy is a useful tool to identify PG vascularization, allowing a better PG preservation and a significant decrease in hypocalcemia rates.

Characteristics and outcomes of chronic pain patients referred to hospital pain clinics: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the patient referral patterns and medical profiles of patients attending hospital pain clinics, and the therapies offered to them, can provide a useful starting point for evaluating their effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out. Sociodemographic and clinical data were gathered at twelve centres. The diagnoses and pain treatments provided by the referring doctors were compared with the ones provided by pain clinicians. Pain severity and patients' quality of life were measured prospectively. Descriptive statistics were compared. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-nine patients referred to 12 outpatient hospital pain clinics in Catalonia were followed for 3 months. Most were referred by orthopaedists (50.0%) or primary care physicians (20.2%). The mean age and time since pain onset were 59.4 and 4.1 years, respectively. Pain clinicians changed the diagnostic labels of 48.5% of the patients. Nearly all patients (89.2%) were receiving pain medications prior to referral. Treatment was modified in 94.8%. Pain clinicians used more interventional and/or alternative therapies (65.1% of patients), opioids (46.8%) and co-adjuvants (38.2%). Three months after referral, the 24-h worst and current pain severity had decreased by 30.9% and 27.8% on average, respectively. The mean (effect size) improvements in a quality of life (the EuroQol 5 Dimensions index) and pain (visual analogue scale) scores were, respectively, 0.16 (0.73) and 6.7 (0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Pain clinicians refined the diagnoses and treatments of patients referred to hospital pain clinics and improved outcomes. Relatively few patients are referred from primary care considering the prevalence of chronic pain in this setting.

Assessment of the feasibility of high-concentration capsaicin patches in the pain unit of a tertiary hospital for a population of mixed refractory peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes in non-diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: High-concentration-capsaicin-patches (Qutenza®) have been put on the market as a treatment for peripheral neuropathic pain. A minimum infrastructure and a determinate skill set for its application are required. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of treatment with high-concentration-capsaicin-patches in clinical practice in a variety of refractory peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes in non-diabetic patients. METHODS: Observational, prospective, single-center study of patients attended to in the Pain Unit of a tertiary hospital, ≥ 18 year-old non-responders to multimodal analgesia of both genders. The feasibility for the application of capsaicin patch in clinical practice was evaluated by means of the number of patients controlled per day when this one was applied and by means of the times used for patch application. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and September 2011, 20 consecutive non-diabetic patients (7 males, 13 females) with different diagnoses of refractory peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes, with a median (range) age of 60 (33-88) years-old were treated with a single patch application. The median (range) number of patients monitored per day was not modified when the capsaicin patch was applied [27 (26-29)] in comparison with it was not applied [28 (26-30)]. The median (range) total time to determine and mark the painful area was 9 (6-15) minutes and of patch application was 60 (58-65) minutes. No important adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSION: High-concentration-capsaicin-patch treatment was feasible in our unit for the treatment of a population with refractory peripheral neuropathic pain. The routine of our unit was not affected by its use.