Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec ; 63(5): 1229-1232, out. 2011. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-605851

RESUMEN

Avaliou-se a atividade antimicrobiana dos óleos essenciais (OE) de Origanum vulgare (orégano), Thymus vulgaris (tomilho), Lippia graveolens (lipia), Zingiber officinale (gengibre), Salvia officinalis (sálvia), Rosmarinus officinalis (alecrim) e Ocimum basilicum (manjericão), e de suas frações majoritárias, carvacrol e timol, frente a 32 isolados de Staphylococcus spp, oriundos de rebanhos leiteiros bovinos. A concentração inibitória mínima (CIM) e a concentração bactericida mínima foram determinadas por meio da técnica de microdiluição em caldo. Orégano, tomilho e lípia (Orégano Mexicano) apresentaram atividade antimicrobiana similar, médias geométrica de CIM de 1600µg mL-1; 1564µg mL-1; 1562µg mL-1, respectivamente, no entanto menos ativos que carvacrol, 584µg mL-1 e thymol, 427µg mL-1. Isolados com diferentes perfis de susceptibil idade aos antimicrobianos usados no tratamento de mastite bovina, quando subagrupados, foram inibidos por concentrações semelhantes de OE . Estes resultados confirmam a atividade antimicrobiana de OE e algumas frações majoritárias.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Bovinos , Antiinfecciosos , Mastitis Bovina , Ocimum basilicum , Origanum , Thymus serpyllum/uso terapéutico , Timol/uso terapéutico
2.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 18 Suppl 3: S4-6, 1991.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1720485

RESUMEN

The efficacy and safety of isradipine and nifedipine retard were compared in 51 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week placebo run-in period was followed by an 8-week course of treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to either isradipine 1.25 mg twice daily (n = 24) or nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 826); dosages were doubled if blood pressure was not normalized [diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg) after 4 weeks of active treatment. Systolic/diastolic blood pressures were significantly reduced (p less than 0.01/p less than 0.01) by isradipine from 162/103 to 145/89 mm Hg, and by nifedipine from 162/104 to 143/88 mm Hg. Normalization rates were 79% with isradipine and 67% with nifedipine. It was necessary to double the dosage in seven of the patients taking isradipine and in three of those taking nifedipine; the mean final dosages were 1.63 mg and 22.4 mg twice daily, respectively. Heart rate did not change significantly with either treatment. There were drug-related adverse events in five patients (21%) taking isradipine (2 edema, 2 headache, 2 palpitations, 1 flushing) and in eight (30%) of those taking nifedipine (5 edema, 2 headache, 1 palpitations). Therapy was withdrawn in one patient in the isradipine group (1 headache) and two patients in the nifedipine group (1 edema, 1 headache). We conclude that isradipine is a highly effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Dihidropiridinas/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/efectos adversos , Dihidropiridinas/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipertensión/sangre , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Isradipino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Portugal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA