Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BJOG ; 129(2): 301-312, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34651405

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of prenatal detection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) following maternal primary infection in the first trimester within standard pregnancy follow-up or involving population-based screening (serological testing at 7 and 12 weeks of gestation), with or without secondary prevention (valaciclovir) in maternal CMV primary infection. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study from the perspective of the French national health insurance system. SETTING: Cost-effectiveness based on previously published probability estimates and associated plausible ranges hypothetical population of 1,000,000 pregnant women. POPULATION: Hypothetical population of 1,000,000 pregnant women. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of detecting fetal cCMV in terms of the total direct medical costs involved and associated expected outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection rates and clinical outcomes at birth. RESULTS: Moving to a population-based approach for targeting fetal CMV infections would generate high monetary and organizational costs while increasing detection rates from 15% to 94%. This resource allocation would help implementing horizontal equity according to which individuals with similar medical needs should be treated equally. Secondary prevention with valaciclovir had a significant effect on maternal-fetal CMV transmission and clinical outcomes in newborns, with a 58% decrease of severely infected newborns for a 3.5% additional total costs. Accounting for women decision-making (amniocentesis uptake and termination of pregnancy in severe cases) did not impact the cost-effectiveness results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could fuel thinking on the opportunity of developing clinical guidelines to rule identification of cCMV infection and administration of in-utero treatment. These findings could fuel the development of clinical guidelines on the identification of congenital CMV infection and the administration of treatment in utero. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: CMV serological screening followed by valaciclovir prevention may prevent 58% to 71% of severe cCMV cases for 38 € per pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/sangre , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/economía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/economía , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 47(11): 776-782, 2019 11.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288093

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During their studies, French midwives need to acquire basic ultrasound skills to measure the amniotic fluid index, fetal biometry and identify fetal lie and placental positions. They have a clinical ultrasound training during their curriculum to acquire these skills. Assess the contribution that a training on an obstetrical ultrasound simulator (OUS) could make to the competence of midwives and to evaluate the best time to integrate it into their curriculum. METHODS: Forty students in their 4th and final year in midwifery were randomized into 2 groups. Group A learned with the traditional academic course, with a clinical ultrasound training which was followed by an evaluation on an OUS (E1A). Group B was evaluated on a simulator before the clinical ultrasound training (E1B). After these initial assessments, both groups were provided with learning and training sessions on OUS, and re-evaluated in the same exercise (E2A and E2B). Group B then completed its clinical ultrasound training and was evaluated one month later on the simulator (E3B). The evaluation consisted of scoring the biometry images according to previously published quality criteria, and of assessing their competence based on a published objective and structured assessment score of ultrasound skills (OSAUS). RESULTS: Evaluation 1 found comparable OSAUS scores (2.375/5 vs. 2.24/5 P=0.52) between the two groups (E1A vs. E1B) but a significantly higher image quality score for Group A (P=0.02). In Evaluation 2, an improvement was noted for both groups with comparable OSAUS averages between the two groups (P=0.76). After the clinical training of Group B, their OSAUS score (E3B) was significantly better than that of Group A (E1A) after their clinical training (3.45/5 vs. 2.375/5 [P=0.00017]). The same was true for the quality of their images (12.67/16 vs. 9.95/16 [P=0.003]). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound simulation-based training, as an adjunct to ultrasound clinical training, significantly improves obstetrical ultrasound skills. The best time to train on simulators seems to be prior to clinical training on real patients.


Asunto(s)
Partería/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 31(3): 332-7, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18307213

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the learning curve of transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in labor and to compare it with that of digital vaginal examination. METHODS: A student midwife who had never performed digital vaginal examination or ultrasound examination was recruited for this study. Instructions on how to perform digital vaginal examination and ultrasound examination were given before and after completing the first vaginal and ultrasound examinations, and repeated for each subsequent examination for as long as necessary. Digital and ultrasound diagnoses of the fetal head position were always performed first by the student midwife, and repeated by an experienced midwife or physician. The learning curve for identification of the fetal head position by either one of the two methods was analyzed using the cumulative sums (CUSUM) method for measurement errors. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent digital vaginal examination and 99 had transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position. An error rate of around 50% for vaginal examination was nearly constant during the first 50 examinations. It decreased subsequently, to stabilize at a low level from the 82(nd) patient. Errors of +/- 180 degrees were the most frequent. The learning curve for ultrasound imaging stabilized earlier than that of vaginal examination, after the 32(nd) patient. The most frequent errors with ultrasound examination were the inability to conclude on a diagnosis, particularly at the beginning of training, followed by errors of +/- 45 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings for the student tested, learning and accuracy of the determination of fetal head position in labor were easier and higher, respectively, with transabdominal sonography than with digital examination. This should encourage physicians to introduce clinical ultrasound examination into their practice. CUSUM charts provide a reliable representation of the learning curve, by accumulating evidence of performance.


Asunto(s)
Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Partería/educación , Examen Físico/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Trabajo de Parto , Palpación , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA