Circulating tumor cells detected in follow-up predict survival outcomes in tri-modality management of advanced non-metastatic esophageal cancer: a secondary analysis of the QUINTETT randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to establish if presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) predicted worse outcome in patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer undergoing tri-modality therapy. METHODS: We prospectively collected CTC data from patients with operable non-metastatic esophageal cancer from April 2009 to November 2016 enrolled in our QUINTETT esophageal cancer randomized trial (NCT00907543). Patients were randomized to receive either neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus radiotherapy followed by surgical resection (Neoadjuvant) or adjuvant cisplatin, 5-FU, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrent extended volume radiotherapy following surgical resection (Adjuvant). CTCs were identified with the CellSearch® system before the initiation of any treatment (surgery or chemoradiotherapy) as well as at 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment. The threshold for CTC positivity was one and the findings were correlated with patient prognosis. RESULTS: CTC data were available for 74 of 96 patients and identified in 27 patients (36.5%) at a median follow-up of 13.1months (interquartile range:6.8-24.1 months). Detection of CTCs at any follow-up visit was significantly predictive of worse disease-free survival (DFS;hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-4.24; p=0.002), regional control (HR: 6.18; 95% CI: 1.18-32.35; p=0.031), distant control (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.52-5.65;p=0.001) and overall survival (OS;HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.16-3.51; p=0.013). After adjusting for receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the presence of CTCs at any follow-up visit remained significantly predictive of worse OS ([HR]:2.02;95% [Cl]:1.16-3.51; p=0.013) and DFS (HR: 2.49;95% Cl: 1.43-4.33; p=0.001). Similarly, any observed increase in CTCs was significantly predictive of worse OS (HR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.56-6.34; p=0.001) and DFS (HR: 3.34; 95% CI: 1.67-6.69; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of CTCs in patients during follow-up after tri-modality therapy was associated with significantly poorer DFS and OS regardless of timing of chemoradiotherapy.

The quality of life in neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy of esophageal cancer treatment trial (QUINTETT): Randomized parallel clinical superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for resectable stage I-III esophageal cancer. METHODS: A total of 96 patients were randomized to standard neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (neoadjuvant) followed by surgical resection or adjuvant cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and epirubicin chemotherapy with concurrent extended volume radiotherapy (adjuvant) following surgical resection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the functional assessment of cancer therapy-esophageal (FACT-E) total scores between arms at 1 year (p = 0.759) with 36% versus 41% (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant), respectively, showing an increase of ≥15 points compared to pre-treatment (p = 0.638). The HRQOL was significantly inferior at 2 months in the neoadjuvant arm for FACT-E, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-OG25), and EuroQol 5-D-3 L in the dysphagia, reflux, pain, taste, and coughing domains (p < 0.05). Half of patients were able to complete the prescribed neoadjuvant arm chemotherapy without modification compared to only 14% in the adjuvant arm (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy related adverse events of grade ≥2 occurred significantly more frequently in the neoadjuvant arm (100% vs. 69%, p < 0.001). Surgery related adverse events of grade ≥2 were similar in both arms (72% vs. 86%, p = 0.107). There were no 30-day mortalities and 2% vs. 10% 90-day mortalities (p = 0.204). There were no significant differences in either overall survival (OS) (5-year: 35% vs. 32%, p = 0.409) or disease-free survival (DFS) (5-year: 31% vs. 30%, p = 0.710). CONCLUSION: Trimodality therapy is challenging for patients with resectable esophageal cancer regardless of whether it is given before or after surgery. Newer and less toxic protocols are needed.

Pretreatment Serum Folate Levels and Toxicity/Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy is associated with severe and unpredictable toxicity in a significant proportion of patients. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate bind to thymidylate synthase and together inhibit its function, resulting in cytotoxicity. We hypothesized that susceptibility to 5-FU toxicity might be related to individual differences in the serum components of folate metabolism affecting intracellular 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of chemotherapy-naive colorectal cancer patients scheduled to receive intravenous 5-FU and folinic acid for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in both adjuvant and palliative settings was studied. Pretreatment clinical and laboratory data were collected. Biochemical data associated with folate metabolism were also collected. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicity and/or toxicity mandating dose delay or reduction. RESULTS: For the 78 eligible patients studied, multivariable analyses identified only a greater pretreatment serum folate level as an independent predictor of grade ≥ 3 toxicity and/or mandating schedule modification (P = .016). Comparing the patient cohorts among the folate quartile groups revealed increasing toxicity trends in the highest quartile with an odds ratio of 2.58 (P = .19) compared with the combined lower quartiles, and superior relapse-free and overall survival for patients treated in the adjuvant setting. Log-rank analysis showed a significant association between higher folate levels and relapse-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The pretreatment serum folate level did not conclusively influence 5-FU toxicity and antitumor efficacy. However, high folate levels showed a trend toward a greater incidence of severe toxicities but also lower rates of disease recurrence and mortality. These results provide promising hypothesis-generating data warranting further investigation. The predictive value of pretreatment folate status should be a priority for study in cancer patients receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy and should be considered a potentially confounding factor in clinical trials and a modifiable parameter in treatment.