Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Subjects.

Purpose The objective of the current study was to investigate the short-term test-retest reliability of contralateral suppression (CS) of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. Method Twenty-three young normal-hearing subjects were tested. An otoscopic evaluation, admittance measures, pure-tone audiometry, measurements of CEOAEs without and with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) to determine CS were performed at baseline (n = 23), an immediate retest without and with refitting of the probe (only CS of CEOAEs; n = 11), and a retest after 1 week (n = 23) were performed. Test-retest reliability parameters were determined on CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and on raw and normalized CS indices between baseline and the other test moments. Results Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated no random or systematic changes in CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and in raw and normalized CS indices between the test moments. Moderate-to-high intraclass correlation coefficients with mostly high significant between-subjects variability between baseline and each consecutive test moment were found for CEOAE response amplitude without and with CAS, and for the raw and normalized CS indices. Other reliability parameters deteriorated between CEOAE response amplitudes with CAS as compared to without CAS, between baseline and retest with probe refitting, and after 1 week, as well as for frequency-specific raw and normalized CS indices as compared to global CS indices. Conclusions There was considerable variability in raw and normalized CS indices as measured using CEOAEs with CAS using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. More research is needed to optimize the measurement of CS of CEOAEs and to reduce influencing factors, as well as to make generalization of test-retest reliability data possible.

Diagnostic accuracy of CE Chirp.

OBJECTIVE: There has been an increase in the use of the CE-Chirp stimulus in automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) equipment for neonatal hearing screening. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LS CE-Chirp-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) compared to the click-evoked ABR for the identification of different degrees and configurations of sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss. METHOD: 49 ears with mild to moderate SNHL were assessed: 16 ears with rising SNHL and 33 ears with sloping high frequency SNHL. Behavioural pure tone thresholds were obtained at 125-8000 Hz and ABR thresholds were measured using the click and LS CE-Chirp stimuli respectively. Click- and LS CE-Chirp-evoked thresholds were compared with each other and with behavioural pure tone average at 500, 1000, 2000 Hz (PTA), high frequency average at 2000, 4000, 8000 Hz (HFA) and low frequency average at 250, 500, 1000 Hz (LFA). Diagnostic accuracy of the two ABR stimuli was also compared by using ROC curves. RESULTS: Differences between click- and LS CE Chirp-evoked ABR, and behavioural thresholds were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The highest significant correlations for ABR using clicks to behavioural thresholds was found at 2000 and 4000 Hz, whereas, the highest correlation for LS CE-Chirp ABRs to behavioural thresholds was found at 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz (r > 0.7, p < 0.001). A very strong, positive correlation was found between both click (r = 0.805, p < 0.001) and LS CE-Chirp (r = 0.825, p < 0.001) and the behavioural PTA. LS CE-Chirp ABR thresholds were closer to mid and low frequency thresholds than the click ABR while the click-evoked thresholds were in closer proximity to HFA. Sensitivity and specificity and false negative rates were identical. Diagnostic accuracy of the LS CE-Chirp ABR was equal to or better than click for low (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.83), mid (AUC = 0.89) and high frequency hearing losses (AUC = 0.73). However, scatterplots indicated more frequent underestimation of behavioural pure tone thresholds at mid and high frequencies with the LS CE-Chirp than for the click ABR. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of the LS CE Chirp-evoked ABR is equivalent or better than the click-evoked ABR. The importance of ongoing surveillance and consideration of ABR screening protocols is consequently emphasized.

Analysis of probe fitting stimulus properties on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Objective: The objectives of the current study are first, to evaluate the subjective evaluation of probe fitting stimulus properties, and second, to analyse the effects of different probe fittings on transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) response and noise amplitudes in subjects.Design: The Q methodology was used to sort 48 probe fittings differing in stimulus properties in seven categories from totally unacceptable to certainly acceptable. Further, TEOAE response and noise amplitudes were measured in one baseline condition with optimal probe fitting and eight experimental conditions with less than optimal probe fittings.Study sample: The probe fittings were ranked by 18 participants, while the repeated measures design was performed in 34 ear.Results: First, it was found that only 19.61% of all distributions of the probe fittings by the participants had a mutual correlation of at least 70.00%. Almost 60% of the variance of distributions was explained by 83.33% of the participants, although most probe fittings significantly differed from other fittings based on spectral broadness. Second, significant differences in TEOAE response and especially noise amplitudes between conditions were found. Further, TEOAE response and noise amplitudes between the baseline and experimental conditions were significantly different depending on ringing and spectral flatness of the stimulus.Conclusion: A substantial amount of subjectivity during TEOAE measurements is involved with regard to the evaluation of probe fitting stimulus properties. TEOAE response but especially noise amplitudes are influenced by varying stimulus parameters which stresses the importance of inspecting these parameters prior to or during EOAE measurements. Although more research is needed, some guidelines regarding these parameters are given which could improve the accuracy of TEOAEs in practice.

Cobalt toxicity in humans-A review of the potential sources and systemic health effects.

Cobalt (Co) and its compounds are widely distributed in nature and are part of numerous anthropogenic activities. Although cobalt has a biologically necessary role as metal constituent of vitamin B12, excessive exposure has been shown to induce various adverse health effects. This review provides an extended overview of the possible Co sources and related intake routes, the detection and quantification methods for Co intake and the interpretation thereof, and the reported health effects. The Co sources were allocated to four exposure settings: occupational, environmental, dietary and medical exposure. Oral intake of Co supplements and internal exposure through metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants deliver the highest systemic Co concentrations. The systemic health effects are characterized by a complex clinical syndrome, mainly including neurological (e.g. hearing and visual impairment), cardiovascular and endocrine deficits. Recently, a biokinetic model has been proposed to characterize the dose-response relationship and effects of chronic exposure. According to the model, health effects are unlikely to occur at blood Co concentrations under 300µg/l (100µg/l respecting a safety factor of 3) in healthy individuals, hematological and endocrine dysfunctions are the primary health endpoints, and chronic exposure to acceptable doses is not expected to pose considerable health hazards. However, toxic reactions at lower doses have been described in several cases of malfunctioning MoM hip implants, which may be explained by certain underlying pathologies that increase the individual susceptibility for Co-induced systemic toxicity. This may be associated with a decrease in Co bound to serum proteins and an increase in free ionic Co2+. As the latter is believed to be the primary toxic form, monitoring of the free fraction of Co2+ might be advisable for future risk assessment. Furthermore, future research should focus on longitudinal studies in the clinical setting of MoM hip implant patients to further elucidate the dose-response discrepancies.

'Standard' versus 'nose reference' electrode placement for measuring oVEMPs with air-conducted sound: Test-retest reliability and preliminary patient results.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared two electrode placements ('standard' versus 'nose reference' placement) for measuring oVEMPs, elicited by air-conducted 500Hz tone bursts. The test-retest reliability of both positions was evaluated and additionally both electrode placements were applied on a group of vestibular patients. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers (range of 20-25years) participated in the first part and were retested after one week for evaluation of the test-retest reliability. Eleven patients (range of 41-74years) with a variety of vestibular pathologies were tested once. RESULTS: In the normal group, the nose reference electrode placement resulted in significantly larger peak-to-peak amplitudes (p<0.001), shorter n10 (p=0.001) and p15 (p<0.001) latencies and smaller 95% prediction intervals for the Inter-Ocular Ratio (IOR) ([-68, 68] for the standard position versus [-32, 32] for the nose reference position). Furthermore, an excellent amplitude and IOR test-retest reliability was observed with the nose reference configuration, as shown by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the coefficient of variation of the method error (CVME) and the minimal detectable differences (MDD). In the patient group, the same significant amplitude difference was found. Moreover, three patients presented with absent oVEMPs when recorded with the standard placement, whereas the nose reference placement could evoke a detectable oVEMP response. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a nose reference electrode position results in larger oVEMP amplitudes and achieves a better reliability for the most important clinical parameters (amplitude and IOR). Our patient data substantiate the possible clinical benefit of this position, but further systematic patient verification is required. SIGNIFICANCE: The nose reference electrode position facilitates the detection of generally very small oVEMP responses and shows a high test-retest reliability, showing promising potential for future use in the vestibular clinic.

cVEMPs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of stimulus type, SCM muscle activation method, transducer type, and method to control SCM muscle EMG level on response parameter values for 0.1-ms click-evoked and 500-Hz tone burst cVEMPs. A description of normative response values was attempted. DESIGN: An electronic systematic literature review was performed to obtain normative cVEMP response data. Subsequently a meta-analysis was conducted to determine significant effects on cVEMP response parameters and to obtain norms. STUDY SAMPLE: Scopus was used to identify reports containing normative data. Reports were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria determined beforehand. Weighted means were calculated and compared to identify significant effects and normative data. RESULTS: Sixty-six reports were included in the systematic review. Stimulus type, SCM muscle activation method, transducer type, and method to control SCM muscle EMG level had significant effects on all response parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal stimulus and recording parameters suggested by previous research are confirmed by the current systematic review and meta-analysis and are suggested for clinical use. Response parameter values are influenced by variations in stimulus and recording parameters and normative response values are suggested as guideline for cVEMP interpretation.

Determination and evaluation of clinically efficient stopping criteria for the multiple auditory steady-state response technique.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed at establishing clinically efficient stopping criteria for a multiple 80-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) system. METHODS: In Experiment 1, data of 31 normal-hearing subjects were analyzed off-line to propose stopping rules. Consequently, ASSR recordings will be stopped when (1) all 8 responses reach significance and significance can be maintained for 8 consecutive sweeps; or (2) the mean noise levels were 4nV (if p-values were between 0.05 and 0.1, measurements were extended once by 8 sweeps); or (3) a maximum amount of 48 sweeps was attained; whichever occurred first. In Experiment 2, these stopping criteria were applied on 10 normal hearing and 10 hearing-impaired adults to assess the efficiency. RESULTS: The application of these stopping rules resulted in ASSR threshold values that were comparable to other ASSR research. Furthermore, preliminary analysis of the response and noise amplitudes demonstrated slightly higher values for hearing impaired than normal-hearing subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed stopping rules can be used in adults to determine accurate ASSR thresholds within a time-frame of about 1h. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of these a priori stopping criteria might assist the clinician in their decision to terminate ASSR recordings.

The effects of aging on evoked otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

OBJECTIVE: There is still controversy regarding the effects of aging on evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs), as well as on the efferent system measured by contralateral acoustic stimulation of EOAEs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the deterioration in EOAEs and efferent suppression (ES) in a representative sample statistically controlling for the differences in hearing thresholds. METHODS: Seventy-one ears (20-79years) were included in the study, 47 of which had normal hearing thresholds, and 24 ears had a sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss caused by presbycusis. The effects of aging on transient evoked (TEOAEs) and distortion product OAEs (DPOAEs), and on ES were evaluated using multiple regression and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: EOAEs and ES were more strongly correlated with age, than with pure-tone thresholds (PTTs). Moreover, the increase in the amount of variance explained by the regression model using both predictors was larger for PTTs as compared to the variable age. CONCLUSIONS: The deterioration of EOAEs and ES with advancing age is caused mainly by pure age-effects, and additionally by the reduction in hearing thresholds. SIGNIFICANCE: The relative contribution of age and hearing thresholds on EOAEs, as well as on ES is important for their interpretation in clinical settings.

The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of the air-conduction multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response (ASSR) technique to diagnose normal hearing (NH) and mild and moderate degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), to assess patients with conductive hearing loss (CHL), to evaluate flat and sloping configurations of hearing impairment, and to provide sensitivity and specificity values for various ASSR cutoff criteria. DESIGN: A comparative study between ASSR and criterion-standard behavioral thresholds. SETTING: Ear, nose, and throat department at a university hospital. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 40 adults with NH, 17 with SNHL, and 7 with CHL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measure of interest was the difference between ASSR and behavioral thresholds at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and efficiency were calculated for several ASSR cutoff criteria. RESULTS: The ASSR technique clearly distinguished moderate SNHL from NH, but the "mild SNHL and NH" and "mild SNHL and moderate SNHL" differentiation was particularly difficult at 0.5 and 2.0 kHz, respectively. Air-conduction ASSR thresholds accurately predicted behavioral thresholds in CHL. The ASSR system precisely reflected the flat and sloping configurations. Finally, the most appropriate ASSR cutoff point for normality seems to be the 30-dB-or-lower criterion. CONCLUSIONS: In adults, the multiple-frequency 80-Hz ASSR technique can be used to determine the degree and configuration of hearing loss. Although air-conduction ASSR thresholds accurately predicted behavioral thresholds in CHL, future research with bone-conduction ASSRs is necessary to establish the type of hearing loss. Furthermore, the applicability of these findings still needs to be confirmed for infants.

Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults.

The present study utilized a commercially available multiple auditory steady-state response (ASSR) system to test normal hearing adults (n=55). The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the mixed modulation (MM) and the novel proposed exponential AM(2)/FM stimuli on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and threshold estimation accuracy, through a within-subject comparison. The second aim was to establish a normative database for both stimulus types. The results demonstrated that the AM(2)/FM and MM stimulus had a similar effect on the SNR, whereas the ASSR threshold results revealed that the AM(2)/FM produced better thresholds than the MM stimulus for the 500, 1000, and 4000 Hz carrier frequency. The mean difference scores to tones of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were for the MM stimulus: 20+/-12, 14+/-9, 10+/-8, and 12+/-8 dB; and for the AM(2)/FM stimulus: 18+/-13, 12+/-8, 11+/-8, and 10+/-8 dB, respectively. The current research confirms that the AM(2)/FM stimulus can be used efficiently to test normal hearing adults.