RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This clinical study compared the antibacterial effects after brushing with a novel herbal toothpaste incorporating zinc [test] to a control fluoride toothpaste on anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria of dental plaque, tongue scrapings and cheek surfaces. METHODS: This double-blind, two-cell study enrolled 44 adults [age range 19-63 years]. Subjects completed a 1-week washout and provided baseline oral samples i.e. dental plaque, tongue and cheek scrapings for microbiological analysis. Diluted samples for microbiological analyses were plated on agar to enumerate anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria representing functional groups of organisms. Subjects were randomized to brush their teeth with either the test or control with the first brushing conducted under supervision in the dental clinic. Post-treatment samples were collected 12 h after 21 day hygiene with assigned toothpaste. After providing these samples, subjects brushed in the dental clinic with additional samples collected 4 h after brushing. Statistical analyses were conducted separately for each organism collected from each oral niche by t-test for within-treatment assessments and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for between-treatment comparisons. RESULTS: Treatment groups demonstrated no significant differences at baseline for anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria in any oral niche (p > 0.05). The test demonstrated reductions between 42 and 68% for anaerobic bacteria in oral niches, 12 h after brushing with reductions increasing to 46-80%, 4 h after brushing. Similarly, the test demonstrated reductions between 49 and 61% for gram-negative bacteria of oral niches that increased to 54-69% at the 4 h post-brushing evaluation. Reductions in malodor organisms of 22-42% were noted 12 h after brushing that increased to 60-72%, 4 h after brushing. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to control, brushing with a novel herbal toothpaste demonstrated significant reductions in functional bacterial groups from distinct oral niches 12 h after brushing with additional microbial reductions 4 h after brushing.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triclosan is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent used in toothpaste to reduce dental plaque, gingivitis and oral malodor. This community-level assessment evaluated the susceptibility of dental plaque bacteria to triclosan in samples collected over 19 years. METHODS: A total of 155 dental plaque samples were collected at eleven different times over 19 years from 58 adults using 0.3% triclosan, 2% copolymer, 0.243% sodium fluoride toothpaste and from 97 adults using toothpaste without triclosan. These included samples from 21 subjects who used triclosan toothpaste for at least five years and samples from 20 control subjects. The samples were cultured on media containing 0, 7.5 or 25 µg/ml triclosan. Descriptive statistics and p values were computed and a linear regression model and the runs test were used to examine susceptibility over time. RESULTS: Growth inhibition averaged 99.451% (91.209 - 99.830%) on media containing 7.5 µg/ml triclosan and 99.989% (99.670 - 100%) on media containing 25 µg/ml triclosan. There was no change in microbial susceptibility to triclosan over time discernible by regression analysis or the runs test in plaque samples taken over 19 years including samples from subjects using a triclosan-containing dentifrice for at least five years. CONCLUSIONS: This community-level assessment of microbial susceptibility to triclosan among supragingival plaque bacteria is consistent with the long-term safety of a 0.3% triclosan, 2% copolymer, 0.243% sodium fluoride dentifrice.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Placa Dental/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Triclosán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Carga Bacteriana , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Viabilidad Microbiana , Fluoruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Pastas de Dientes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The effects of amlodipine and perindopril on renal hemodynamics and tubular function in cyclosporine-treated hypertensive renal allograft recipients were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind crossover fashion. Ten patients were studied after a 2-week placebo run-in and, after 8 weeks of active treatment, allowing a 2-week placebo washout between treatments. At the end of each period, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were measured as 51Cr-EDTA and 123I-hippuran clearance, respectively, and tubular function evaluated by the lithium clearance technique was determined. Both drugs maintained GFR and ERPF and lowered mean arterial pressure (MAP, mm Hg) to a similar extent (time x treatment, P = 0.466): amlodipine from 126.9 +/- 2.5 to 115.9 +/- 2.2; perindopril from 126.9 +/- 2.5 to 117.9 +/- 3.9 (time effect of all treatments together, P = 0.003). Accordingly, renal vascular resistance (RVR, mm Hg/mL/min/1.73 m2) was equally reduced (time x treatment, P = 0.955): amlodipine from 0.36 +/- 0.03 to 0.30 +/- 0.02; perindopril from 0.36 +/- 0.03 to 0.32 +/- 0.01 (time effect all treatments together, P = 0.043). Sodium clearance and fractional excretion of sodium were not affected by either drug. Output of fluid from the proximal tubules measured as clearance of lithium (CLi, mL/min) and uric acid (CUr, mL/min) was higher after amlodipine than after perindopril (CLi 19.1 +/- 2.1 v 16.5 +/- 1.7, P =0.036 and CUr 7.0 +/- 0.6 v 5.9 +/- 0.4, P = 0.007). As a consequence, after amlodipine, distal absolute reabsorption of sodium was higher (DARNa 2.57 +/- 0.28 v 2.19 +/- 0.22 mEq/min, P = 0.027) and serum uric acid was lower (5.9 +/- 0.3 v 6.7 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P = 0.001) in comparison with perindopril. In cyclosporine-treated renal allograft hypertensives, amlodipine and perindopril lower blood pressure equally and reduce RVR to the same extent. Overall sodium excretion is not affected by either agent. Urate clearance is higher and serum uric acid lower on amlodipine as compared with perindopril.