Long-term Outcomes of Adding Lutein/Zeaxanthin and ω-3 Fatty Acids to the AREDS Supplements on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression: AREDS2 Report 28.

Importance: After the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) study, the beta carotene component was replaced by lutein/zeaxanthin for the development of the revised AREDS supplement. However, it is unknown if the increased risk of lung cancer observed in those assigned beta carotene persists beyond the conclusion of the AREDS2 trial and if there is a benefit of adding lutein/zeaxanthin to the original AREDS supplement that can be observed with long-term follow-up. Objective: To assess 10-year risk of developing lung cancer and late age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter epidemiologic follow-up study of the AREDS2 clinical trial, conducted from December 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018. Included in the analysis were participants with bilateral or unilateral intermediate AMD for an additional 5 years after clinical trial. Eyes/participants were censored at the time of late AMD development, death, or loss to follow-up. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to March 2022. Interventions: During the clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned primarily to lutein/zeaxanthin and/or ω-3 fatty acids or placebo and secondarily to no beta carotene vs beta carotene and low vs high doses of zinc. In the epidemiologic follow-up study, all participants received AREDS2 supplements with lutein/zeaxanthin, vitamins C and E, and zinc plus copper. Outcomes were assessed at 6-month telephone calls. Analyses of AMD progression and lung cancer development were conducted using proportional hazards regression and logistic regression, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported lung cancer and late AMD validated with medical records. Results: This study included 3882 participants (mean [SD] baseline age, 72.0 [7.7] years; 2240 women [57.7%]) and 6351 eyes. At 10 years, the odds ratio (OR) of having lung cancer was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.06-3.12; P = .02) for those randomly assigned to beta carotene and 1.15 (95% CI, 0.79-1.66; P = .46) for lutein/zeaxanthin. The hazard ratio (HR) for progression to late AMD comparing lutein/zeaxanthin with no lutein/zeaxanthin was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99; P = .02) and comparing ω-3 fatty acids with no ω-3 fatty acids was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93-1.09; P = .91). When the lutein/zeaxanthin main effects analysis was restricted to those randomly assigned to beta carotene, the HR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.92; P = .002). A direct analysis of lutein/zeaxanthin vs beta carotene showed the HR for late AMD was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.98; P = .02). The HR for low vs high zinc was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.94-1.14; P = .49), and the HR for no beta carotene vs beta carotene was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.94-1.15; P = .48). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this long-term epidemiologic follow-up study of the AREDS2 cohort suggest that lutein/zeaxanthin was an appropriate replacement for beta carotene in AREDS2 supplements. Beta carotene usage nearly doubled the risk of lung cancer, whereas there was no statistically significant increased risk with lutein/zeaxanthin. When compared with beta carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin had a potential beneficial association with late AMD progression.

Principal Cause of Poor Visual Acuity after Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Report Number 23.

PURPOSE: To analyze the principal cause for poor vision in eyes with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or worse 2 years after neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of participants enrolled in a clinical trial of oral supplements. PARTICIPANTS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) participants whose eyes began anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for incident nAMD and had data available at 2 years. METHODS: Participants underwent refracted BCVA testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, and fundus photography at baseline and annual visits. Self-reports of anti-VEGF injections were collected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Principal cause of BCVA of 20/200 or worse at 2 years, detected on fundus photography grading. RESULTS: Of the 594 eligible eyes, the number with BCVA of 20/200 or worse at 2 years was 56 (9.4%). Mean BCVA was 14.9 letters (standard deviation [SD], 12.3 letters; Snellen equivalent, 20/500), versus 70.1 letters (SD, 12.8 letters; Snellen equivalent, 20/40) in the other group. Of the 55 eyes with fundus photography available at 2 years, 33 (60.0%) had central macular atrophy and 22 (40.0%) had central subretinal fibrosis assessed as the principal cause for poor vision. The group with poor BCVA had a higher proportion of non-White participants (8.9% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.006), lower BCVA 2 years earlier (mean, 38.0 letters [SD, 26.7 letters; Snellen equivalent, 20/160] vs. 71.8 letters (SD, 11.9 letters; Snellen equivalent, 20/40]; P < 0.0001), higher proportion with macular atrophy 2 years earlier (26.8% vs. 12.3%; P = 0.003), higher proportion with macular hemorrhage (25.5% vs. 13.2%; P = 0.014), and fewer anti-VEGF injections (7.6 vs. 10.2; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity data and fundus photography were obtained in a clinical trial environment, but were related to anti-VEGF therapy given in routine clinical practice. At 2 years after starting anti-VEGF therapy, almost 1 in 10 eyes showed BCVA at the level of legal blindness. From fundus photography grading, the cause of poor vision appeared to be macular atrophy in 60% and subretinal fibrosis in 40%. These data may be useful in understanding the long-term limits to good vision in nAMD.

Association of 2-Year Progression Along the AREDS AMD Scale and Development of Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration or Loss of Visual Acuity: AREDS Report 41.

Importance: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study age-related macular degeneration (AREDS AMD) scale is designed to classify AMD severity. The present cohort study explored whether 2-year progression along this scale was useful for estimating the risk of future progression to late AMD or best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss. Objective: To assess whether 2-year progression along the AREDS AMD scale can be used to estimate the probability of long-term clinically meaningful outcome measures for clinical trials or epidemiologic studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: Age-Related Eye Disease Study participants enrolled in a clinical trial of oral micronutrient supplements had annual color fundus photographs graded centrally using the AREDS AMD scale. Two-year progression (≥2-step and ≥3-step increases in AMD score between baseline and the 2-year study visit) was evaluated as a method of estimating the risk of long-term progression to late AMD or BCVA loss. The AREDS (1992-2001) was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial based at 11 retinal specialty clinics in the United States. The dates of analysis in the present cohort study were November 1992 through November 2005. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development of neovascular (NV) AMD, central geographic atrophy (CGA), any geographic atrophy (GA), or BCVA loss of at least 2 lines or at least 3 lines. Results: Among 3868 participants in the AREDS free of late AMD at baseline, the mean (SD) age was 68.3 (5.0) years, and 2180 of 3868 (56.4%) were women. In the first 2 years after randomization to the AREDS, 669 of 7458 (9.0%) of eyes had at least 2-step 2-year progression, and 275 of 7458 (3.7%) of eyes had at least 3-step 2-year progression. In the 5-year follow-up period (years 2-7), 486 of 7223 (6.7%) of eyes developed NV AMD, 339 of 7253 (4.7%) developed CGA, 726 of 7246 (10.0%) developed any GA, 2622 of 7095 (37.0%) had at least 2-line BCVA loss, and 1494 of 7155 (20.9%) had at least 3-line BCVA loss. After adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders and stratifying by baseline AMD score, statistically significant associations were observed between at least 2-step and at least 3-step 2-year progression of AMD score and subsequent 5-year development of NV AMD: hazard ratios (HRs) ranged from 3.6 (99% CI, 2.4-5.2) to 19.4 (99% CI, 7.7-48.9). For CGA, HRs ranged from 2.6 (99% CI, 1.7-4.0) to 4.7 (99% CI, 2.5-8.9); the results were similar for any GA. For at least 2-line and at least 3-line BCVA loss, HRs ranged from 1.3 (99% CI, 1.0-1.7) to 2.8 (99% CI, 1.8-4.3). For all outcomes, at least 3-step 2-year progression had stronger associations than at least 2-step 2-year progression. These findings were also validated in the AREDS2 cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: Two-year progression of AMD score was associated with progression to clinically meaningful anatomic (late AMD) and vision (≥2-line or ≥3-line loss) outcomes, suggesting that this scale may be useful for future clinical trials designed to slow the progression of AMD.

Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Report Number 19.

PURPOSE: To analyze best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of participants enrolled in a clinical trial of oral supplements and receiving anti-VEGF therapy in routine clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) participants (50-85 years of age) whose eyes met AREDS2 inclusion criteria at baseline (no late AMD, BCVA ≥20/100, no previous anti-VEGF injections) but received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection for incident neovascular AMD during follow-up. METHODS: Participants underwent refracted BCVA testing, ophthalmoscopic examination, and stereoscopic color fundus photography at baseline and annual study visits over 5 years. Self-reports of anti-VEGF injections (numbers, dates, and names of drug) were collected at baseline and annual study visits and during telephone calls every 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were mean refracted BCVA and proportions of eyes with BCVA of 20/40 or better and 20/200 or worse. An exploratory outcome measure was the mean number of self-reported anti-VEGF injections. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred five eyes of 986 AREDS2 participants met the inclusion criteria; of these, 977 participants (99.1%) underwent at least 1 posttreatment visit. At the first and subsequent annual examinations after the first injection, mean refracted BCVAs were 68.0 letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/40), 66.1 letters, 64.7 letters, 63.2 letters, and 61.5 letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/60). Proportions of eyes with BCVA of 20/40 or better were 59.3%, 55.1%, 53.5%, 50.6%, and 49.7%, and those with BCVA of 20/200 or worse were 5.5%, 8.6%, 9.4%, 12.4%, and 14.4%. Mean annual numbers of self-reported anti-VEGF injections per eye were 2.9, 3.9, 3.3, 3.1, and 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: Refracted BCVA data were obtained in a clinical trial environment but were related to anti-VEGF treatment administered in normal clinical practice. Visual outcomes declined slowly with increased follow-up time: mean BCVA decreased by approximately 1.5 to 2 letters per year. At 5 years, half of eyes achieved BCVA of 20/40 or better, but approximately one sixth showed BCVA of 20/200 or worse. These data may be useful in assessing the long-term effects of anti-VEGF therapy.

Self-transcendence in Alzheimer's disease: the application of theory to practice.

The middle-range nursing theory of self-transcendence may be applicable to individuals in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Full cognitive ability may not be necessary for the essential principles of this theory to be implemented. The theory can offer guidance to families and health care providers in attempting to facilitate a meaningful aging process. A case scenario of an elderly woman with Alzheimer's disease demonstrates how family and caregivers can initiate interventions based on the theoretical concepts.