Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 66(2): 131-42, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15372215

RESUMEN

There are numerous possibilities for replacing chemical techniques with biotechnological methods based on renewable resources. The potential of biotechnology (products, technologies, metabolic pathways) is for the most part well known. Often the costs are still the problem. Biotechnological advances have the best chances for replacing some fine chemicals. While the raw material costs are less of a consideration here, the environmental benefit is huge, as chemical-technical processes often produce a wide range of undesirable/harmful by-products or waste. In the case of bulk chemicals (<1 US dollar/kg) the product price is affected mainly by raw material costs. As long as fossil raw materials are still relatively inexpensive, alternatives based on renewable resources cannot establish themselves. Residues and waste, which are available even at no cost in some cases, are an exception. The introduction of new technologies for the efficient use of such raw materials is currently being promoted. The utilisation of residual wood, plant parts, waste fat, and crude glycerol, for example, provides great potential. For industrial chemicals (2-4 US dollars/kg), process and recovery costs play a greater role. Here, innovative production technologies and product recovery techniques (e.g. on-line product separation) can increase competitiveness.


Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/métodos , Biotecnología/tendencias , Industria Química/tendencias , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción/tendencias , Biotecnología/economía , Industria Química/economía , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción/economía , Microbiología Industrial , Petróleo , Eliminación de Residuos
2.
Water Sci Technol ; 47(11): 173-80, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12906287

RESUMEN

The overall energy consumption of domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) increases with treatment efficiency. Approximately 30 to 45 kWh per people equivalent and year is mostly necessary for advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal, while the aeration contains the main part of approximately 60%. A new process using encapsulated nitrifiers on gel lens beads is introduced to overcome the high energy consumption of aeration. A more selective nitrification process was found at a nitrification rate of between 50 and 60 mg nitrogen per hour and litre reaction volume corresponding to a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of about 30 to 60 minutes while the soluble Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) removal could be less than 30% depending on operational conditions of the bio-reactor. The latter enables internal use of wastewater's COD for a post denitrification. For the new process the energy consumption as well as total volume of bio-reactor are much less (approximately 30 to 50% for both) than conventional processes due to the low sludge age for COD and nitrate removal and the avoidance of internal wastewater recycle. Therefore, self-sufficient energy operation of domestic WWTPs operating with advanced treatment efficiency could become possible, if energy recovery by anaerobic sludge digestion is included.


Asunto(s)
Nitrógeno/aislamiento & purificación , Nitrógeno/metabolismo , Fósforo/aislamiento & purificación , Fósforo/metabolismo , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos/métodos , Purificación del Agua/métodos , Reactores Biológicos , Metabolismo Energético , Oxígeno/química , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Aguas del Alcantarillado/química , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA