RESUMEN
The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and adverse reactions of ofloxacin vs trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole were investigated in a double-blind, randomised study in 250 female patients (125 in each group) with acute, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections. The dosages of ofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole were 100mg and 160mg + 800mg twice daily, respectively. The duration of therapy was 3 days. 81% of the patients had significant bacteriuria. Escherichia coli was isolated in 76% and Staphylococcus saprophyticus in 11% of the infections. The bacteriological elimination, clinical cure and improvement rates of the evaluable patients on ofloxacin treatment were 92 and 95%, respectively. The corresponding figures on trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole therapy were 88 and 90%. Adverse reactions were clinically unimportant, and none of the patients had to stop treatment. Mild and transient side effects, mainly from the gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system and skin, were reported by 19 and 22% of the patients in the ofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole groups, respectively. None of the differences in clinical and bacteriological efficacy and side effects of ofloxacin vs trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole were statistically significant. Ofloxacin appears to be an appropriate antibiotic for short term therapy of acute, uncomplicated, lower urinary tract infections, comparing favourably with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole treatment in this study.