Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Holist Integr Oncol ; 1(1): 7, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37520336

RESUMEN

Purpose: Breast cancer is now the most common malignant tumor worldwide. About one-fourth of female cancer patients all over the world suffer from breast cancer. And about one in six female cancer deaths worldwide is caused by breast cancer. In terms of absolute numbers of cases and deaths, China ranks first in the world. The CACA Guidelines for Holistic Integrative Management of Breast Cancer were edited to help improve the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment in China. Methods: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to classify evidence and consensus. Results: The CACA Guidelines for Holistic Integrative Management of Breast Cancer include the epidemiology of breast cancer, breast cancer screening, breast cancer diagnosis, early breast cancer treatment, advanced breast cancer treatment, follow-up, rehabilitation, and traditional Chinese medicine treatment of breast cancer patients. Conclusion: We to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in China through the formulation of the CACA Guidelines.

2.
Front Pharmacol ; 13: 1081978, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36686653

RESUMEN

Introduction: Bone metastasis of breast cancer (BC) is a process in which the disruption of the bone homeostatic microenvironment leads to an increase in osteoclast differentiation. Ailanthus altissima shows an inhibitory effect on osteoclast differentiation. Ailanthone (AIL) refers to a natural compound isolated from Ailanthus altissima, a Chinese herbal medicine, and has effective anti-tumor activity in numerous cell lines. Its impact on bone metastases for BC is yet unclear. Methods: We measured the effect of AIL on MDA-MB-231 cells by wound healing experiments, Transwell and colony formation experiment. Using the Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) staining tests, filamentous (F-actin) staining and bone resorption test to detect the effect of AIL on the osteoclast cell differentiation of the Bone Marrow-derived Macrophages (BMMs), activated by the MDA-MB-231 cell Conditioned Medium (MDA-MB-231 CM) and the Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor-κB Ligand (RANKL),and to explore its possibility Mechanisms. In vivo experiments verified the effect of AIL on bone destruction in breast cancer bone metastasis model mice. Results: In vitro, AIL significantly decrease the proliferation, migration and infiltration abilities of MDA-MB-231 cells at a safe concentration, and also reduced the expression of genes and proteins involved in osteoclast formation in MDA-MB-231 cells. Osteoclast cell differentiation of the BMMs, activated by MDA-MB-231 CM and RANKL, were suppressed by AIL in the concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, it inhibits osteoclast-specific gene and protein expression. It was noted that AIL inhibited the expression of the osteoclast differentiation-related cytokines RANKL and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) that were secreted by the MDA-MB-231 cells after upregulating the Forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) expression. Furthermore, AIL also inhibits the expression of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), and Nuclear factor-κB Ligand (NF-κB) signaling pathways, which then suppresses the MDA-MB-231CM-induced development of Osteoclasts. Conclusion: Our study shows that AIL blocks osteoclast differentiation in the bone metastasis microenvironment by inhibiting cytokines secreted by BC cells, which may be a potential agent for the treatment of BC and its secondary bone metastasis.

3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 182(3): 719-726, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524355

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Cisplatin, an effective medication for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), is recommended to be applied at the dose of 75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. However, the 75 mg/m2 schedule is often associated with a variety of side effects (such as vomiting and kidney toxicity), and time-consuming hydration treatment is usually needed. Divided dose (25 mg/m2 on day 1-3) without hydration is an alternative. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles between these two dosage regimens. METHODS: Patients with MBC treated with cisplatin-based regimens in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between December 2008 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profiles were analyzed. RESULTS: 227 patients receiving a 1-day schedule and 256 patients receiving a 3-day schedule were included. Median PFS was 6.68 (5.66-7.70) months for patients in the 1-day schedule group and 6.70 (5.89-7.52) months for patients in the 3-day schedule group. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the two treatment groups (hazard ratio, 0.942; 95% CI 0.759 to 1.170; P = 0.589). The ORRs were comparable between the two groups. ORRs were 44.9% in 1-day schedule group and 44.5% in 3-day schedule group, respectively (P = 0.929). Compared with patients in the 3-day schedule group, patients in the 1-day schedule group experienced higher rates of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) (139 [61.2%] vs. 132 [51.6%], P = 0.033). The risk of hypomagnesaemia was also significantly higher (43.2% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.016) among patients receiving 1-day schedule (without magnesium supplementation). No other differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin given at three divided doses with no hydration in MBC is a less toxic (less CINV and hypomagnesaemia) schedule with comparable efficacy. Thus, it may be a good alternative for one full-dose (75 mg/m2) schedule.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Deficiencia de Magnesio/prevención & control , Náusea/prevención & control , Vómitos/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Gemcitabina
4.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 34: 85, 2015 Aug 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26297142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acidity is a hallmark of malignant tumor, representing a very efficient mechanism of chemoresistance. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) at high dosage have been shown to sensitize chemoresistant human tumor cells and tumors to cytotoxic molecules. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the efficacy of PPI in improving the clinical outcome of docetaxel + cisplatin regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients enrolled were randomly assigned to three arms: Arm A, docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on d4, repeated every 21 days with a maximum of 6 cycles; Arm B, the same chemotherapy preceded by three days esomeprazole (ESOM) 80 mg p.o. bid, beginning on d1 repeated weekly. Weekly intermittent administration of ESOM (3 days on 4 days off) was maintained up to maximum 66 weeks; Arm C, the same as Arm B with the only difference being dose of ESOM at 100 mg p.o. bid. The primary endpoint was response rate. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were randomly assigned and underwent at least one injection of chemotherapy. Response rates for arm A, B and C were 46.9, 71.0, and 64.5 %, respectively. Median TTP for arm A (n = 32), B (n = 31), C (n = 31) were 8.7, 9.4, and 9.7 months, respectively. A significant difference was observed between patients who had taken PPI and who not with ORR (67.7 % vs. 46.9 %, p = 0.049) and median TTP (9.7 months vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.045) [corrected]. Exploratory analysis showed that among 15 patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), this difference was bigger with median TTP of 10.7 and 5.8 months, respectively (p = 0.011). PPI combination showed a marked effect on OS as well, while with a borderline significance (29.9 vs. 19.2 months, p = 0.090). No additional toxicity was observed with PPI. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot clinical trial showed that intermittent high dose PPI enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapy in MBC patients without evidence of additional toxicity, which requires urgent validation in a multicenter, randomized, phase III trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01069081 .


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Esquema de Medicación , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA