Altered bioreactivity and limited osteoconductivity of calcium sulfate-based bone cements in the osteoporotic rat spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous studies documenting the osteoconductive nature of calcium sulfate (CaSO(4))-based biomaterials have been largely limited to animal models exhibiting nonosteoporotic bone biology. In addition to diminished bone mineral density (BMD) and altered bone microarchitecture, the osteoporosis phenotype is associated with a proinflammatory and pro-osteolytic state. Thus, osteoporosis may elicit an amplified bioreactivity to common orthopedic biomaterials, potentially limiting their full osteoconductive capabilities in vivo. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that CaSO(4)-based bone cements exhibit altered bioreactivity and limited osteoconductivity in response to osteoporotic conditions. STUDY DESIGN: 1) Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) radiomorphometry study and 2) histological analysis. METHODS: Our laboratory has previously established a preclinical model of osteoporosis using the rodent osteoporotic spine (OS). Caudal vertebral defects were filled with either CaSO(4) or CaSO(4)/CaPO(4) (Hybrid) cement for each group (n=4). Over 8 weeks, cement resorption profiles, BMD, average cortical thickness, average trabecular thickness, average trabecular spacing, and diaphyseal bone volume fraction were assessed via micro-CT radiomorphometry. Histological analysis was performed on vertebrae obtained postsurgery and at Week 8. RESULTS: Both materials displayed an accelerated cement resorption profile after implantation into the OS vertebrae. Hybrid cement exhibited slower resorption compared with that of CaSO(4) under both normal female rats (NL) and OS conditions. The cement-mediated bone augmentation observed in the NL spine was altered under OS conditions. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that cement bioreactivity is heightened and osteoconductivity may be limited in a preclinical model of the OS. The disparity between the two resorption profiles suggests that this accelerated cement resorption is a material-dependent phenomenon. The proinflammatory and pro-osteolytic bone environment associated with the osteoporosis disease state may contribute to the accelerated resorption and altered osteoconductivity exhibited by both materials. Future study of potential biomaterials intended for use within the OS may necessitate further exploration of the relationship between biomaterial performance and osteoporosis bone biology.

A rat osteoporotic spine model for the evaluation of bioresorbable bone cements.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As the aging population increases, the rising prevalence of osteoporosis-related spine fractures will have a dramatic impact on health care. At present, mainstay treatment relies on systemic medications intended to prevent diminishing bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mass. However, an adjunctive treatment strategy is to target specific areas of the skeletal system that are prone to clinically significant osteoporotic fractures. We term this strategy the "local treatment of osteoporosis" or osteoplasty. Potential use of osteoplasty involves the percutaneous injection of bioresorbable and bioactive bone cements into bones at risk of sustaining osteoporotic fractures. Calcium sulfate (CaSO(4)) is among the candidate bioresorbable bone cements with the material attributes desirable for potential application with osteoplasty, yet previous studies on the osteoconductive properties of CaSO(4) have been limited to animal models exhibiting normal bone biology and architecture. However, osteoporotic bone physiology may potentially interfere with the material properties of common osteoconductive biomaterials, such as that of CaSO(4). To further test this hypothesis, a suitable animal model is needed to evaluate the in vivo behavior of potential biomaterials in osteoporotic bone. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the caudal (proximal tail) rat vertebral body as an appropriate system for the in vivo evaluation of bone cement performance in the osteoporotic spine. STUDY DESIGN: (1) Micro-computed tomography radiomorphometry study and (2) biomechanical vertebral compression analysis. METHODS: Female Sprague Dawley rats were ovarectomized (OVX) at age 8 weeks and subsequently maintained on a low-calcium diet for 3 months. Normal nonovarectomized female rats (NL) of similar age and size were maintained on regular rodent feed. Micro-CT analysis was performed on both the lumbar and caudal vertebrae (levels 5-7) of both groups. The following bone radiomorphometric parameters were determined: bone mineral density (BMD), average cortical thickness (ACT), average trabecular thickness (TbTh), and average trabecular spacing (TbSp). Strength and stiffness of both NL and OVX vertebral bodies were assessed under axial compression at 0.1 mm/s, whereas displacement (mm) and force (N) were measured at 10 Hz until completion to failure. After the implantation of an injectable form of CaSO(4) bone cement into caudal vertebrae, radiomorphometric analysis of cement volume, based on its unique CT absorption profile, was performed over the 8-week time period, as well as the subsequent bone response of both NL and OVX caudal vertebrae to CaSO4. RESULTS: OVX caudal vertebrae showed an 18% decrease in BMD, a 28% decrease in diaphyseal ACT, a 55% decrease in TbTh, and a 2.4-fold increase in TbSp compared with NL (p<.05). Additionally, lumbar vertebrae exhibited a 21% decrease in BMD, a 24% decrease in anterior body ACT, a 48% decrease in TbTh, and a 4.7-fold increase in TbSp (p<.05). Failure testing of OVX caudal vertebral bodies revealed a 29% decrease in strength and a 60% decrease in stiffness compared with NL (p<.01). After implantation into OVX caudal vertebrae, CaSO(4) cement exhibited a 50% decrease in initial cement volume at 2 weeks and complete resorption by 4 weeks, whereas CaSO(4) injected into NL vertebrae exhibited a 79% decrease in initial cement volume at 4 weeks, trace amounts at 6 weeks, and complete resorption by 8 weeks. At 8 weeks, NL vertebrae implanted with CaSO(4) cement exhibited increased cortical bone thickness compared with NL sham vertebrae. This CaSO(4) cement-mediated bone augmentation was altered in osteoporotic vertebrae that exhibited porous irregular cortical bone not noted in cement-treated NL vertebrae or OVX sham vertebrae. CONCLUSIONS: Future investigation of potential biomaterials intended for the local treatment of osteoporosis will require their study within an appropriate osteoporosis animal model. The OVX rat caudal spine exhibits pathologic bone changes consistent with the osteoporosis phenotype, including decreased BMD, diminished trabecular network density, cortical thinning, and decreased mechanical strength. These derangements in bone microarchitecture and physiology may contribute toward the accelerated cement resorption and altered bone response to CaSO4 observed in this study. Important advantages of the OVX rat caudal spine are the rapid and minimally invasive surgical exposure of the vertebral body and the ease of cement injection. We propose that the OVX rat caudal spine represents a valuable and cost-effective tool in the armamentarium of investigators evaluating biomaterials designed for implantation into the osteoporotic spine.

Titanium particles suppress expression of osteoblastic phenotype in human mesenchymal stem cells.

Long-term stability of arthroplasty prosthesis depends on the integration between osseous tissue and the implant biomaterial. Integrity of the osseous tissue requires the contribution of mesenchymal stem cells and their continuous differentiation into an osteoblastic phenotype. This study aims to investigate the hypothesis that exposure to wear debris particles derived from orthopaedic biomaterials affects the osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC). Upon in vitro culture in the presence of osteogenic supplements (OS), we observe that cultures of hMSCs isolated from femoral head bone marrow are capable of osteogenic differentiation, expressing alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein (BSP), in addition to producing collagen type I and BSP accompanied by extracellular matrix mineralization. Exposure of OS-treated hMSCs to submicron commercially pure titanium (cpTi) particles suppresses BSP gene expression, reduces collagen type I and BSP production, decreases cellular proliferation and viability, and inhibits matrix mineralization. In comparison, exposure to zirconium oxide (ZrO2) particles of similar size did not alter osteoblastic gene expression and resulted in only a moderate decrease in cellular proliferation and mineralization. Confocal imaging of cpTi-treated hMSC cultures revealed patchy groups of cells displaying disorganized cytoskeletal architecture and low levels of extracellular BSP. These in vitro findings suggest that chronic exposure of marrow cells to titanium wear debris in vivo may contribute to decreased bone formation at the bone/implant interface by reducing the population of viable hMSCs and compromising their differentiation into functional osteoblasts. Understanding the nature of hMSC bioreactivity to orthopaedic wear debris should provide additional insights into mechanisms underlying aseptic loosening.