RESUMEN
We present a case of wide-complex tachycardia in which the clinical electrophysiological diagnosis was considered to be bundle branch re-entry ventricular tachycardia. A series of ventricular entrainment attempts were performed from the left and right ventricular septum to confirm the diagnosis. Entrainment pacing with a general current output (10 mA) was performed from the right ventricular septum with manifest fusion and a post-pacing interval similar to tachycardia cycle length. Thereafter, another entrainment attempt with a greater current output (20 mA) was performed from the same site. Paradoxically, concealed fusion was demonstrated by selective RB capture only, though there was no clear "RB" potential seen. In this case, we attempt to explain and illustrate the mechanism of paradoxical near-field inability to capture with increasing current strength.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción , Fascículo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Electrocardiografía , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (ILVT), the arrhythmogenic substrate is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the ILVT characteristics and outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with ILVT. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with ILVT and 15 patients with left accessory pathways (control) underwent high-density mapping of the left His-Purkinje system during sinus rhythm (SR) using 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping. RESULTS: Fragmented antegrade Purkinje potential (FAP) was represented at the left ventricular septum slightly inferoposterior to the left posterior fascicle (LPF) in 23 patients with ILVT. In control subjects, no FAPs could be recorded at the same region, FAPs were identified at the proximal portion of the LPF (4 patients) and at the distal LPF (1 patient). The finding of any FAPs in ILVT patients was significantly higher than that in control patients (23/24 vs 5/15, P < .01). Radiofrequency ablation at the area of FAP resulted in successful ablation in 23 patients with ILVT. No ILVT recurred during follow-up of 16.3 ± 7.2 months. CONCLUSION: In patients with ILVT, FAP located at the left ventricular septum slightly inferoposterior to the LPF is a novel finding using 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping. The FAP may represent an arrhythmogenic substrate in ILVT and may be used for guiding successful ablation.