The role and scope of contemporary midwifery practice in Australia: A scoping review of the literature.

PROBLEM: Little is known about the breadth of midwifery scope within Australia, and few midwives work to their full scope of practice. BACKGROUND: Midwives in Australia are educated and professionally accountable to work in partnership with childbearing women and their families, yet they are currently hindered from practicing within their full scope of practice by contextual influences. AIMS: To perform a scoping review of the literature to map out the role and scope of contemporary midwifery practice in Australia To identify any key issues that impact upon working within the full scope of midwifery practice in the Australian context METHODS: A scoping review of the literature guided by the Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodological framework, and the 'best fit' framework synthesis using the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia's Midwifery Standards for Practice. FINDINGS: Key themes that emerged from the review included Partnership with women; The professional role of the midwife; and Contextual influences upon midwifery practice. DISCUSSION: Tensions were identified between the midwifery scope of practice associated with optimal outcomes for women and babies supported by current evidence and the actual role and scope of most midwives employed in models of care in the current Australian public healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: There is a mismatch between the operational parameters for midwifery practice in Australia and the evidence-based models of continuity of midwifery carer that are associated with optimal outcomes for childbearing women and babies and the midwives themselves.

Labouring Together: Women's experiences of "Getting the care that I want and need" in maternity care.

OBJECTIVE: Poor interprofessional collaboration and lack of decision-making with women have been identified as being detrimental to the quality, safety, and experience of maternity care. The aim of the Labouring Together study was to explore childbearing women's preferences for and experiences of collaboration and control over decision-making in maternity care. DESIGN: A sequential, mixed-method, multi-site case study approach was used to explore the perceptions and experiences of childbearing women regarding collaboration and decision-making. Women's preferred role for decision-making compared to the actual experiences, and the influences upon their preferences and experiences of collaboration were explored using semi-structured interviews. An inductive approach was used for qualitative analysis of interviews, and cross-case analyses were conducted using replication logic. SETTING: Postnatal wards of 1 private and 3 public maternity services in both metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Postnatal women, over the age of 18 years (n=182). FINDINGS: Half (48.3%) of the participants indicated a preference for a shared decision-making role and 35% preferred an active role. Only 16.7% participants indicated a preference for a passive role, however 24.4% of women reported experiencing a passive decision-making role during their maternity care. Statistically significant differences were also identified between preferences for and experiences of decision-making among women who chose the private obstetrician model of maternity care compared to the public maternity care system. Negative impacts upon women's autonomy over decision-making included: poor access to midwifery models of care; poor access to relational continuity of care; poor understanding of the rights of the woman; inadequate information for women about the risks and benefits of all proposed interventions; and a bureaucratic style of decision-making based upon a dominant discourse of risk avoidance that could ultimately veto the woman's choice. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence of the benefits for women of having autonomy over decision-making in their own care, fundamental barriers were identified that hindered women's participation in collaboration in maternity care. Shared decision-making with childbearing women is not routine practice in maternity care in Victoria, Australia. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Relational continuity of care is imperative to promote the autonomy of childbearing women and an environment conducive to women's active engagement in maternity care and participation in shared decision-making.

Midwives' experiences of father participation in maternity care at a large metropolitan health service in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Engagement of fathers to participate in pregnancy, birth and early postnatal care has significant advantages for women and infants as well as fathers. In Australia, guidelines for midwifery practice do not include specific recommendations about father-inclusive care, and models for publicly funded maternity care do not extend to the provision of care tailored specifically towards the needs of fathers. This study investigated the perceptions of midwives regarding their role in fathers' wellbeing, the extent of fathers' attendance at and participation in their services, advantages and disadvantages of father participation and barriers and enablers to father engagement. DESIGN: Convergent mixed methods, cross-sectional. SETTING: A large metropolitan public maternity hospital that provides care to some of the most socio-economically disadvantaged suburbs and multi-cultural communities in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All midwives employed at the hospital (n=196) were invited to participate. METHODS: Anonymous online survey and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative survey responses. Interview data and qualitative survey responses were analysed thematically. FINDINGS: Forty midwives working in all areas of maternity services across the hospital completed surveys, and six participated in interviews. The data illustrate the dilemma faced by midwives in their specific role of supporting women and babies. On the one hand, participants indicated that fathers' wellbeing should be part of their role and named many advantages of father participation in maternity services, including support and advocacy for mothers and bonding with infants. Participants estimated that most fathers attend births and visit their partner and infant on the postnatal ward, 52% attend antenatal appointments and 76% are present at postnatal home visits. Participants reported several midwife strategies and health service factors which facilitate father attendance and active engagement. On the other hand, participants reported several barriers to father engagement, including antenatal appointment schedules which are at odds with fathers' work commitments and the lack of on-site group antenatal education. Some of the barriers they reported are specific to the vulnerable communities for which they provide maternity care. Extraordinary circumstances were reported, including fathers working overseas, fathers in prison, new immigrant status that is often accompanied by a lack of family support to care for other children even during labour and birth, and poor socio-economic status. In addition, in many cultures, pregnancy and birth are seen as "women's work"; fathers would not traditionally be involved. Participants also reported that midwives lack training and confidence in engaging fathers, particularly in responding to fathers with mental health concerns. When providing care for families at risk of family violence, father attendance was perceived a significant disadvantage. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Midwife-provided health services represent a significant opportunity to include and address fathers, and midwives recognise the significant advantages of engaging fathers, unless there is a risk of family violence. However, midwives currently report lack of training and confidence in addressing fathers' needs, and several individual, social, cultural, and health service factors can present barriers to engaging fathers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the substantial benefits of engaging fathers for women and infants, we argue that maternity services should promote father engagement, for example by offering after hours appointment schedules, free antenatal and parenting education, and workshops to upskill midwifery staff. Education regarding the importance of father participation and skills for working with fathers should be included in the undergraduate preparation of midwives and other key maternity care professionals. Addressing the challenges of providing care to a multicultural community requires sensitive discussion with families from each of those cultures.