Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(5)2023 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36902110

RESUMEN

Hypertension is the third leading cause of the global disease burden, and while populations live longer, adopt more sedentary lifestyles, and become less economically concerned, the prevalence of hypertension is expected to increase. Pathologically elevated blood pressure (BP) is the strongest risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related disability, thus making it imperative to treat this disease. Effective standard pharmacological treatments, i.e., diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs), beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (BARBs), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), are available. Vitamin D (vitD) is known best for its role in bone and mineral homeostasis. Studies with vitamin D receptor (VDR) knockout mice show an increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity and increased hypertension, suggesting a key role for vitD as a potential antihypertensive agent. Similar studies in humans displayed ambiguous and mixed results. No direct antihypertensive effect was shown, nor a significant impact on the human RAAS. Interestingly, human studies supplementing vitD with other antihypertensive agents reported more promising results. VitD is considered a safe supplement, proposing its great potential as antihypertensive supplement. The aim of this review is to examine the current knowledge about vitD and its role in the treatment of hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Hipertensión , Vitamina D , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/farmacología , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/terapia , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , Vitamina D/farmacología , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Calcitriol/genética , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 20(19)2019 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547602

RESUMEN

This paper reviews current treatments for renal cell carcinoma/cancer (RCC) with the multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib and axitinib. Furthermore, it compares these drugs regarding progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse effects (AE), with a focus on hypertension. Sorafenib and sunitinib, which are included in international clinical guidelines as first- and second-line therapy in metastatic RCC, are now being challenged by new-generation drugs like lenvatinib and axitinib. These drugs have shown significant clinical benefits for patients with RCC, but all four induce a variety of AEs. Hypertension is one of the most common AEs related to MKI treatment. Comparing sorafenib, sunitinib and lenvatinib revealed that sorafenib and sunitinib had the same efficacy, but sorafenib was safer to use. Lenvatinib showed better efficacy than sorafenib but worse safety. No trials have yet been completed that compare lenvatinib with sunitinib. Although axitinib promotes slightly higher hypertension rates compared to sunitinib, the overall discontinuation rate and cardiovascular complications are favourable. Although the mean rate of patients who develop hypertension is similar for each drug, some trials have shown large differences, which could indicate that lifestyle and/or genetic factors play an additional role.


Asunto(s)
Axitinib , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Hipertensión , Neoplasias Renales , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Axitinib/efectos adversos , Axitinib/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/fisiopatología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/efectos adversos , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico
3.
Nutrients ; 11(7)2019 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336573

RESUMEN

Nitric oxide (NO) is a well-known vasodilator produced by the vascular endothelium via the enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). The inadequate production of NO has been linked to elevated blood pressure (BP) in both human and animal studies, and might be due to substrate inaccessibility. This review aimed to investigate whether oral administration of the amino acids l-arginine (Arg) and l-citrulline (Cit), which are potential substrates for eNOS, could effectively reduce BP by increasing NO production. Both Arg and Cit are effective at increasing plasma Arg. Cit is approximately twice as potent, which is most likely due to a lower first-pass metabolism. The current data suggest that oral Arg supplementation can lower BP by 5.39/2.66 mmHg, which is an effect that is comparable with diet changes and exercise implementation. The antihypertensive properties of Cit are more questionable, but are likely in the range of 4.1/2.08 to 7.54/3.77 mmHg. The exact mechanism by which Cit and Arg exert their effect is not fully understood, as normal plasma Arg concentration greatly exceeds the Michaelis constant (Km) of eNOS. Thus, elevated plasma Arg concentrations would not be expected to increase endogenous NO production significantly, but have nonetheless been observed in other studies. This phenomenon is known as the "l-arginine paradox".


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Arginina/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Citrulina/farmacología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Arginina/administración & dosificación , Citrulina/administración & dosificación , Humanos
4.
Nutrients ; 12(1)2019 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31905893

RESUMEN

Vitamin D plays a pivotal role in bone homeostasis and calcium metabolism. However, recent research has indicated additional beneficial effects of vitamin D on the cardiovascular system. This review aims to elucidate if vitamin D can be used as an add-on treatment in coronary artery disease (CAD). Large-scale epidemiological studies have found a significant inverse association between serum 25(OH)-vitamin D levels and the prevalence of essential hypertension. Likewise, epidemiological data have suggested plasma levels of vitamin D to be inversely correlated to cardiac injury after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Remarkably, in vitro trials have showed that vitamin D can actively suppress the intracellular NF-κB pathway to decrease CAD progression. This is suggested as a mechanistic link to explain how vitamin D may decrease vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. A review of randomized controlled trials with vitamin D supplementation showed ambiguous results. This may partly be explained by heterogeneous study groups. It is suggested that subgroups of diabetic patients may benefit more from vitamin D supplementation. Moreover, some studies have indicated that calcitriol rather than cholecalciferol exerts more potent beneficial effects on atherosclerosis and CAD. Therefore, further studies are required to clarify these assumptions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/prevención & control , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatología
5.
Int J Mol Sci ; 19(2)2018 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401665

RESUMEN

The aim of this review is to investigate, whether there is a possible link between vitamin D supplementation and the reduction of blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is known for being deeply involved in cardiovascular tonus and blood pressure regulation. Hence, many of the pharmaceutical antihypertensive drugs inhibit this system. Interestingly, experimental studies in mice have indicated that vitamin D supplementation significantly lowers renin synthesis and blood pressure. It is conceivable that similar mechanisms may be found in the human organism. Regarding this, large-scale cross-sectional studies suggest the serum 25(OH)D-level to be inversely correlated to the prevalence of hypertension. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not found a clear association between vitamin D supplementation and improvements in hypertension. Nevertheless, the missing association of vitamin D and hypertension in clinical trials can be due to suboptimal study designs. There are hints that restoration of serum 25(OH)D levels during vitamin D therapy is essential to achieve possible beneficial cardiovascular effects. It is important to perform long-term trials with a short dose interval and a high bioavailability of supplementation. Taken together, more RCTs are required to further investigate if vitamin D can be beneficial for the reduction of blood pressure.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Hipertensión Esencial/dietoterapia , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/dietoterapia , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión Esencial/complicaciones , Hipertensión Esencial/metabolismo , Hipertensión Esencial/fisiopatología , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Ratones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptores de Calcitriol/genética , Receptores de Calcitriol/metabolismo , Renina/genética , Renina/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/complicaciones , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatología
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 18(12)2017 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29207508

RESUMEN

To prepare the ESA (European Space Agency) spaceflight project "Wound healing and Sutures in Unloading Conditions", we studied mechanisms of apoptosis in wound healing models based on ex vivo skin tissue cultures, kept for 10 days alive in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with bovine serum albumin, hydrocortisone, insulin, ascorbic acid and antibiotics at 32 °C. The overall goal is to test: (i) the viability of tissue specimens; (ii) the gene expression of activators and inhibitors of apoptosis and extracellular matrix components in wound and suture models; and (iii) to design analytical protocols for future tissue specimens after post-spaceflight download. Hematoxylin-Eosin and Elastica-van-Gieson staining showed a normal skin histology with no signs of necrosis in controls and showed a normal wound suture. TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling for detecting DNA fragmentation revealed no significant apoptosis. No activation of caspase-3 protein was detectable. FASL, FADD, CASP3, CASP8, CASP10, BAX, BCL2, CYC1, APAF1, LAMA3 and SPP1 mRNAs were not altered in epidermis and dermis samples with and without a wound compared to 0 day samples (specimens investigated directly post-surgery). BIRC5, CASP9, and FN1 mRNAs were downregulated in epidermis/dermis samples with and/or without a wound compared to 0 day samples. BIRC2, BIRC3 were upregulated in 10 day wound samples compared to 0 day samples in epidermis/dermis. RELA/FAS mRNAs were elevated in 10 day wound and no wound samples compared to 0 day samples in dermis. In conclusion, we demonstrate that it is possible to maintain live skin tissue cultures for 10 days. The viability analysis showed no significant signs of cell death in wound and suture models. The gene expression analysis demonstrated the interplay of activators and inhibitors of apoptosis and extracellular matrix components, thereby describing important features in ex vivo sutured wound healing models. Collectively, the performed methods defining analytical protocols proved to be applicable for post-flight analyzes of tissue specimens after sample return.


Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/fisiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Animales , Apoptosis/genética , Caspasa 3/metabolismo , Dermis/metabolismo , Epidermis/metabolismo , Matriz Extracelular/metabolismo , Humanos , Etiquetado Corte-Fin in Situ , Técnicas In Vitro , Piel/metabolismo , Cicatrización de Heridas/genética
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 18(2)2017 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28230776

RESUMEN

In recent years, targeted therapies have proven beneficial in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and sunitinib are included in international clinical guidelines as first-line and second-line therapy in mRCC. Hypertension is an adverse effect of these drugs and the degree of hypertension associates with the anti-tumour effect. Studies have compared newer targeted drugs to sorafenib and sunitinib in terms of PFS, OS, quality of life and safety profiles. Phase III studies presented promising response rates and acceptable safety profiles of axitinib and tivozanib compared to sorafenib, and a phase II study reported greater efficacy using a combination of bevacizumab and IFN-α compared to sunitinib. Treatment with nintedanib exhibited a notably low prevalence of hypertension compared to sunitinib. The use of sorafenib and sunitinib are challenged by new drugs, but do not appear likely to be substituted in the near future. To clarify whether newer targeted drugs should replace sorafenib and sunitinib, more research is needed. This manuscript reviews the current utility and adverse effects of sorafenib and sunitinib and newer targeted therapies in the treatment of mRCC.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA