Topographic Mapping of Isolated Thalamic Infarcts Using Vascular and Novel Probabilistic Functional Thalamic Landmarks.

PURPOSE: We aimed to re-evaluate the relationship between thalamic infarct (TI) localization and clinical symptoms using a vascular (VTM) and a novel functional territorial thalamic map (FTM). METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data of 65 patients with isolated TI were evaluated (female n = 23, male n = 42, right n = 23, left n = 42). A VTM depicted the known seven thalamic vascular territories (VT: inferolateral, anterolateral, inferomedial, posterior, central, anteromedian, posterolateral). An FTM was generated from a probabilistic thalamic nuclei atlas to determine six functionally defined territories (FT: anterior: memory/emotions; ventral: motor/somatosensory/language; medial: behavior/emotions/nociception, oculomotor; intralaminar: arousal/pain; lateral: visuospatial/somatosensory/conceptual and analytic thinking; posterior: audiovisual/somatosensory). Four neuroradiologists independently assigned diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions to the territories mapped by the VTM and FTM. Findings were correlated with clinical features. RESULTS: The most frequent symptom was a hemisensory syndrome (58%), which was not specific for any territory. A co-occurrence of hemisensory syndrome and hemiparesis had positive predictive values (PPV) of 76% and 82% for the involvement of the inferolateral VT and ventral FT, respectively. Thalamic aphasia had a PPV of 63% each for involvement of the anterolateral VT and ventral FT. Neglect was associated with involvement of the inferolateral VT/ventral FT. Interrater reliability for the assignment of DWI lesions to the VTM was fair (κ = 0.36), but good (κ = 0.73) for the FTM. CONCLUSION: The FTM revealed a greater reproducibility for the topographical assignment of TI than the VTM. Sensorimotor hemiparesis and neglect are predictive for a TI in the inferolateral VT/ventral FT. The hemisensory syndrome alone does not allow any topographical assignment.

Complication rate of intraarterial treatment of severe cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage with nimodipine and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty: Worth the risk?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Arterial cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is discussed as the main pathomechanism for DCI. Due to positive effects of per os nimodipine, intraarterial nimodipine application is used in patients with DCI. Further, percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) is applied in focal high-grade spasm of intracranial arteries. However, clinical benefits of those techniques are unconfirmed in randomized trials so far, and complications might occur. We analyzed the occurrence of new infarcts in patients with severe CVS treated intra-arterially to assess benefits and risks of those techniques in a large single-center collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging and clinical data of 88 patients with CVS after SAH and 188 procedures of intraarterial nimodipine infusion and additional PTA in selected cases (18 patients, 20 PTA procedures) treated at our institution were reviewed. In the event of new infarcts after endovascular treatment of CVS, infarct patterns were analyzed to determine the most probable etiology. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients developed new cerebral infarction after intraarterial nimodipine and additional PTA in selected cases. Hereunder 47% were caused by persisting CVS. In 6% of patients, 3% of procedures respectively, new infarcts occurred due to complications of the intraarterial treatment including thromboembolism and arterial dissection. Of those, 3% of patients, 2% of procedures respectively, were assigned to thrombembolic complications of digital substraction angiography for intraarterial nimodipine. 17% of all patients treated with PTA (3/18=17%) showed infarction as a complication of PTA (15% of all PTA procedures). In 1% of patients, etiology of new infarction remained unclear. CONCLUSION: Ischemic complications occur in about 6% of patients treated intraarterially for CVS, 3% of procedures respectively. Further, to date a benefit for patients treated with this therapy could not be proven. Therefore, intraarterial treatment of CVS should be performed only in carefully selected cases.