Sexual response in patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for lower urinary tract symptoms or fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for urinary symptoms or fecal incontinence gives improvement of female sexual function and whether improvement is due to physiological or psychological factors. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2008, 8 patients had an array of questionnaires before and after SNM implantation. The questionnaires were: the Questionnaire for Screening for Sexual Dysfunctions, the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction, the Symptom Checklist-90, the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire and the McGill-Mah Orgasm Questionnaire. Three of these 8 patients underwent vaginal plethysmography before and after implantation. RESULTS: No statistically significant changes were found, although there seems to be a trend toward improvement in orgasm scores. In plethysmography all 3 patients showed increased vaginal pulse amplitude with the stimulator turned on with both erotic and non-erotic stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not show a clear effect of SNM on sexual function, although there seems to be an improvement in orgasm scores. The lack of response on psychological questionnaires and the increase in vaginal pulse amplitude after SNM implantation indicate that there might be a physiological response.

Sacral nerve modulation for defaecation and micturition disorders in patients with spina bifida.

AIM: Sacral nerve modulation is a well accepted method for the treatment of defaecation disorders and voiding dysfunction. Results of sacral nerve modulation in patients with spinal cord lesions are not well assessed, but preliminary results look poor. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of sacral nerve modulation for defaecation disorders and voiding dysfunction in patients with spina bifida. METHOD: Consecutive patients with spina bifida suffering from a myelomeningocele and combined faecal and urinary functional disorders that were eligible for peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) were studied. A permanent sacral nerve modulation implantation was performed after successful PNE. RESULTS: Ten patients (four female) were included in this study with a median age of 26.4 (range 11.1-41.0) years. In two the PNE was not possible. The median faecal incontinence days (6.0 vs 3.5) and episodes (8.5 vs 3.5) per 21 days decreased significantly during the 3-week period of PNE (P = 0.033). Only 3/10 (30%) patients had a more than 50% improvement and proceeded to a permanent sacral nerve modulation implantation. In one patient it was not possible to perform the permanent implant. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results of sacral nerve modulation in a subgroup of spina bifida patients with combined faecal and urinary functional disorders look promising, but long-term results in larger patient groups need to be studied.

Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective single center study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the influence of technical improvements of Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) on the incidence of surgical interventions and subjective long-term results of SNS. METHODS: Retrospective, transversal study analyzing records of implanted patients at our department of Urology. RESULTS: Of 149 patients analyzed, 107 had overactive bladder symptoms and 42 had urinary retention. Mean follow-up was 64,2 (sd = 38,5) months. In the whole group 194 adverse events occurred. 6 Patients had infection in their implanted system, one was explanted for infection. Most events could be solved by giving advice or by reprogramming the stimulator. 129 reoperations have been performed and 21 patients had their system explanted. Analysis of the data shows a striking difference in the incidence of reoperations, but small differences in subjective results in the groups of patients implanted before or after 1996, suggesting that a proactive approach towards adverse events is worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: SNS gives lasting benefit in patients with refractory symptoms of overactive bladder and non-obstructive urinary retention. The differences in outcomes and incidence of reoperation can be attributed to the learning curve and technical and surgical improvements in the application of SNS.

European experience with bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Although there is experimental and clinical evidence that bilateral stimulation of the sacral nerves could lead to summation effects, no significant differences in unilateral versus bilateral neuromodulation could be demonstrated in a comparative trial. In some individuals, however, only bilateral stimulation relieved symptoms. Therefore, if a unilateral percutaneous nerve evaluation test fails, a bilateral test should be considered. Further clinical research with long-term follow-up will allow the identification of which patients could benefit from bilateral stimulation with greater specificity and ameliorate further the long-term results achieved with unilateral SNS.

Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic voiding dysfunction.

PURPOSE: Bilateral sacral nerve neuromodulation has been proposed as a more effective treatment for chronic voiding dysfunction. However no comparison with the unilateral approach has been performed. We investigated the possible advantage of bilateral sacral neuromodulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized crossover trial we investigated 33 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of a temporary test lead. Unilateral and bilateral test stimulation was continued for 4 to 6 days in all patients. Patients were randomly assigned to start with bilateral or unilateral stimulation. Between the stimulation episodes a 2-day washout interval was scheduled. Voiding diaries were completed at baseline and during the entire stimulation period. Sacral x-rays were taken to confirm lead positioning or possible migration after implantation and at the end of the test stimulation period. After 10 days the temporary leads were removed and voiding diaries were analyzed. RESULTS: After stimulation sacral x-ray revealed test lead migration in 8 patients, leaving 12 patients with urge incontinence and 13 with voiding difficulty and urinary retention available for review. A statistically significant improvement in voiding parameters was seen during the test stimulation period. However no statistically significant improvement was seen due to bilateral stimulation compared to unilateral stimulation. Two patients with urinary retention only started voiding to completion during bilateral stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral is in general not superior to unilateral sacral neuromodulation. However, in some individuals bilateral stimulation may be more effective in relieving symptoms. Therefore, if unilateral percutaneous nerve evaluation fails, a bilateral test should be considered.

Predictive factors for sacral neuromodulation in chronic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate data from 211 patients who underwent a trial stimulation (percutaneous nerve evaluation [PNE]) to determine the clinical parameters that can enhance the prediction of PNE success. The advantageous effect of sacral neuromodulation depends on the accurate identification of suitable candidates during the preimplantation PNE. METHODS: A total of 211 patients (161 women and 50 men), with refractory urge incontinence, urgency-frequency syndrome, and urinary retention, underwent a PNE. Patient data (demographics, medical history, urologic investigations, and diagnosis) were collected. The PNE results were evaluated from a voiding diary and patient history. More than 50% improvement of voiding parameters was considered a successful PNE, and those patients were selected for implantation. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The factors tested for predicting the test result were sex, patient age, diagnosis, previous surgery, neurogenic bladder dysfunction, duration of complaints, and previous treatments. RESULTS: The PNEs were positive in 85 patients (40.3%) and negative in 105 patients (49.8%). In 18 patients (8.5%), the test electrode had migrated; 3 more patients were not assessable and were also excluded. Missing data on the variable "duration of complaints" reduced the number of patients in the analyses from 190 to 174 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intervertebral disk prolapse, duration of complaints, neurogenic bladder dysfunction, and urge incontinence were found to be significant predictive factors. However, a PNE remains necessary to evaluate a patient's chance of implant success objectively.