Cerebral radiation necrosis: a review of the pathobiology, diagnosis and management considerations.

Radiation therapy forms one of the building blocks of the multi-disciplinary management of patients with brain tumors. Improved survival following radiation therapy may come with a cost, including the potential complication of radiation necrosis. Radiation necrosis impacts the quality of life in cancer survivors, and it is essential to detect and effectively treat this entity as early as possible. Significant progress in neuro-radiology and molecular pathology facilitate more straightforward diagnosis and characterization of cerebral radiation necrosis. Several therapeutic interventions, both medical and surgical, may halt the progression of radiation necrosis and diminish or abrogate its clinical manifestations, but there are still no definitive guidelines to follow explicitly that guide treatment of radiation necrosis. We discuss the pathobiology, clinical features, diagnosis, available treatment modalities, and outcomes in the management of patients with intracranial radiation necrosis that follows radiation used to treat brain tumors.

NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.

PURPOSE: NovoTTF-100A is a portable device delivering low-intensity, intermediate frequency electric fields via non-invasive, transducer arrays. Tumour Treatment Fields (TTF), a completely new therapeutic modality in cancer treatment, physically interfere with cell division. METHODS: Phase III trial of chemotherapy-free treatment of NovoTTF (20-24h/day) versus active chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Primary end-point was improvement of overall survival. RESULTS: Patients (median age 54 years (range 23-80), Karnofsky performance status 80% (range 50-100) were randomised to TTF alone (n=120) or active chemotherapy control (n=117). Number of prior treatments was two (range 1-6). Median survival was 6.6 versus 6.0 months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-year survival rate was 20% and 20%, progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 21.4% and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTF and active control patients. Responses were more common in the TTF arm (14% versus 9.6%, p=0.19). The TTF-related adverse events were mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin rash beneath the transducer arrays. Severe adverse events occurred in 6% and 16% (p=0.022) of patients treated with TTF and chemotherapy, respectively. Quality of life analyses favoured TTF therapy in most domains. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first controlled trial evaluating an entirely novel cancer treatment modality delivering electric fields rather than chemotherapy. No improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, however efficacy and activity with this chemotherapy-free treatment device appears comparable to chemotherapy regimens that are commonly used for recurrent glioblastoma. Toxicity and quality of life clearly favoured TTF.

Severe transient hypertension after greater palatine foramen block in a patient taking midodrine.

We report an episode of transient, severe hypertension occurring within 2 minutes of injection of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 U of epinephrine in a patient taking midodrine for orthostatic hypotension. We hypothesize that the patient's autonomic nervous system was dangerously susceptible to the effect of local anesthetic when combined with the vasoactive systemic effect of midodrine. Surgeons should minimize the use of vasoconstrictors in patients treated with midodrine to avoid hypertensive complications.