Australian National Standards of Care for Childhood-onset Heart Disease (CoHD Standards). 1st Edition.

These first Australian National Standards of Care for Childhood-onset Heart Disease (CoHD Standards) have been developed to inform the healthcare requirements for CoHD services and enable all Australian patients, families and carers impacted by CoHD (paediatric CoHD and adult congenital heart disease [ACHD]) to live their best and healthiest lives. The CoHD Standards are designed to provide the clarity and certainty required for healthcare services to deliver excellent, comprehensive, inclusive, and equitable CoHD care across Australia for patients, families and carers, and offer an iterative roadmap to the future of these services. The CoHD Standards provide a framework for excellent CoHD care, encompassing key requirements and expectations for whole-of-life, holistic and connected healthcare service delivery. The CoHD Standards should be implemented in health services in conjunction with the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards developed by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. All healthcare services should comply with the CoHD Standards, as well as working to their organisation's or jurisdiction's agreed clinical governance framework, to guide the implementation of structures and processes that support safe care.

Predictors of outcomes in children awaiting heart transplantation: an experience from a National Paediatric Heart Transplantation Programme.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of mortality while awaiting heart transplantation (HT) may be greater in the setting of a smaller population and lower donor organ rates. Optimizing allocation policy and identifying the most vulnerable patients will help reduce mortality. As such, we aimed to evaluate the predictors of outcomes in patients awaiting HT as part of a National Paediatric HT Programme. METHODS: Between 1988 and 2015, 200 children were listed for HT as part of a National Paediatric HT Programme. We categorized patients as experiencing one of four competing events: (i) transplant, (ii) death, (iii) delisting for clinical deterioration and (iv) delisting for clinical improvement. Comparison was made across three study eras: Era 1: 1988-95; Era 2: 1996-2005; Era 3: 2006-15. A multivariable competing risk regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of transplantation and the composite event of death or delisting for clinical deterioration. RESULTS: Among the 200 patients listed, 60% (119/200) underwent transplantation, 22% (44/200) died on the waiting list, 7% (13/200) were delisted for clinical deterioration and 11% (21/200) were delisted due to clinical improvement, with 2% (3/200) being still active on the waiting list. The mortality-rate for patients who remained on the waiting list decreased from 27% in Era 1 to 18% in Era 3. The survival from wait-listing was 57, 47 and 39% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. On multivariable competing risk regression, older age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, P = 0.029) and the absence of inotropic support (HR 2.22, 1.23-4.00, P = 0.0073) were predictors of reaching transplantation. Higher creatinine (per 20 µmol/l, HR 1.42, 1.03-1.95, P = 0.03) was a predictor of the composite endpoint of death or delisting for deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of a National Paediatric HT Programme, waiting-list mortality has decreased over time though it remains higher than countries with higher donor rates. The requirement for inotropic support and worsening renal function were predictors of failure to reach transplantation. These patients are likely to benefit the most from ventricular-assist device therapy and higher priority listing.