Chemoradiotherapy plus hyperthermia (CRTH) versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone in neoadjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: tumor response, treatment toxicity and disease control.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are still preferably delivered sequentially, with or without concurrent hyperthermia. Concurrent delivery of chemo-, radio- and thermotherapy may produce synergistic effects and reduce chemotherapy-free intervals. The few available studies suggest that concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) has a greater local effect. Data on the efficacy and toxicity of adding hyperthermia to CRT (CRTH) are sparse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 101 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk who received CRT (n = 33) or CRTH (n = 68) before resection of macroscopic tumor (CRT: n = 19, CRTH: n = 49) or re-resection following a non-oncological resection, so called 'whoops procedure', (CRT: n = 14, CRTH: n = 19) were included in this retrospective study. CRT consisted of two cycles of doxorubicine (50 mg/m2 on d2) plus ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2 on d1-5, q28) plus radiation doses of up to 60 Gy. Hyperthermia was delivered in two sessions per week. RESULTS: All patients received the minimum dose of 50 Gy. Median doses of ifosfamide and doxorubicin were comparable between CRT (75%/95%) and CRTH (78%/97%). The median number of hyperthermia sessions was seven. There were no differences in acute toxicities. Major wound complications occurred in 15% (CRT) vs. 25% (CRTH) (p = 0.19). In patients with macroscopic disease, the addition of hyperthermia resulted in a tendency toward improved remission: regression ≥90% occurred in 21/48 (CRTH) vs. 4/18 (CRT) patients (p = 0.197). With a median postoperative follow-up of 72 months, 6-year local control and overall survival rates for CRTH vs. CRT alone were 85 vs. 78% (p = 0.938) and 79 vs. 71% (p = 0.215). CONCLUSIONS: Both CRT and CRTH are well tolerated with an expected rate of wound complications. The results suggest that adding hyperthermia may improve tumor response.

Detailed in vitro analyses of the impact of multimodal cancer therapy with hyperthermia and radiotherapy on the immune phenotype of human glioblastoma cells.

PURPOSE: Improvements of heat-delivery systems have led to hyperthermia (HT) being increasingly recognized as an adjunct treatment modality also for brain tumors. But how HT affects the immune phenotype of glioblastoma cells is only scarcely known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We therefore investigated the effect of in vitro HT, radiotherapy (RT), and the combination of both (RHT) on cell death modalities, immune checkpoint molecule (ICM) expression and release of the danger signal HSP70 of two human glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and U251) by using multicolor flow cytometry and ELISA. Hyperthermia was performed once or twice for 60-minute sessions reaching temperatures of 39 °C, 41 °C, and 44 °C, respectively. RT was administered with 5 x 2 Gy. RESULTS: A hyperthermia chamber for cell culture t-flasks regulating the temperature via a contact sensor was developed. While the glioblastoma cells were rather radioresistant, particularly in U251 cells, the combination of RT with HT significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic and necrotic cells for all temperatures examined and for both, single and double HT application. In line with that, an increased release of HSP 70 was seen only in U251 cells, mainly following treatment with HT at temperatures of 44 °C alone or in combination with RT. In contrast, immune suppressive (PD-L1, PD-L2, HVEM) and immune stimulatory (ICOS-L, CD137-L and Ox40-L) ICMs were significantly increased mostly on U87 cells, and particularly after RHT with 41 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Individual assessment of the glioblastoma immune cell phenotype with regard to the planned treatment is mandatory to optimize multimodal radio-immunotherapy protocols including HT.